Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Washington by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington 5 N/A 2,009.8 (1,998.0, 2,021.7) N/A 23,103 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 1,975.2 (1,973.5, 1,977.0) N/A 1,010,129 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Mason County 7 Rural 2,364.2 (2,250.3, 2,482.4) 1 (1, 11) 340 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Clallam County 7 Rural 2,360.3 (2,269.8, 2,453.5) 2 (1, 8) 524 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.3)
Grays Harbor County 7 Rural 2,287.1 (2,180.1, 2,398.1) 3 (1, 14) 362 falling falling trend -1.4 (-4.3, -0.6)
Whatcom County 7 Urban 2,253.6 (2,185.1, 2,323.7) 4 (1, 14) 854 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 3.6)
Skagit County 7 Urban 2,244.3 (2,162.4, 2,328.5) 5 (1, 14) 582 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.5, -0.5)
Jefferson County 7 Rural 2,244.2 (2,120.4, 2,373.4) 6 (1, 15) 261 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.2)
Island County 7 Rural 2,240.9 (2,147.9, 2,336.9) 7 (1, 15) 455 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 3.8)
Douglas County 6 Urban 2,239.9 (2,087.5, 2,400.5) 8 (1, 16) 164 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Snohomish County 7 Urban 2,233.3 (2,192.5, 2,274.8) 9 (3, 13) 2,401 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 2.2)
Kitsap County 7 Urban 2,226.8 (2,165.8, 2,289.0) 10 (2, 14) 1,059 falling falling trend -0.3 (-0.5, -0.1)
Pierce County 7 Urban 2,199.4 (2,161.6, 2,237.7) 11 (5, 14) 2,681 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 2.3)
Thurston County 7 Urban 2,186.8 (2,127.5, 2,247.4) 12 (4, 15) 1,076 falling falling trend -0.9 (-3.3, -0.4)
San Juan County 7 Rural 2,183.0 (2,008.8, 2,368.2) 13 (1, 18) 124 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.2, 8.4)
Chelan County 6 Urban 2,117.7 (2,013.0, 2,226.4) 14 (5, 18) 316 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Okanogan County 6 Rural 2,089.6 (1,955.0, 2,231.1) 15 (4, 20) 187 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
King County 7 Urban 2,017.9 (1,994.3, 2,041.7) 16 (14, 18) 5,812 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 1.1)
Grant County 6 Rural 1,961.4 (1,854.1, 2,073.3) 17 (14, 24) 258 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Kittitas County 6 Rural 1,917.2 (1,773.3, 2,069.8) 18 (14, 28) 136 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Yakima County 6 Urban 1,905.9 (1,840.3, 1,973.3) 19 (16, 24) 653 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.7, 4.3)
Pacific County 6 Rural 1,885.1 (1,740.6, 2,038.5) 20 (14, 29) 132 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Benton County 6 Urban 1,861.5 (1,792.0, 1,933.1) 21 (17, 26) 559 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Franklin County 6 Urban 1,829.0 (1,700.1, 1,965.1) 22 (16, 31) 159 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Lewis County 6 Rural 1,815.8 (1,723.7, 1,911.5) 23 (17, 29) 300 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.7, -1.9)
Cowlitz County 6 Urban 1,736.4 (1,655.0, 1,820.7) 24 (20, 32) 352 rising rising trend 5.2 (2.2, 8.6)
Clark County 6 Urban 1,733.0 (1,689.9, 1,776.9) 25 (22, 31) 1,290 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Klickitat County 6 Rural 1,699.8 (1,542.6, 1,868.9) 26 (18, 35) 90 falling falling trend -11.9 (-21.2, -3.5)
Adams County 6 Rural 1,666.9 (1,428.2, 1,934.3) 27 (16, 38) 36 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.8)
Walla Walla County 6 Urban 1,663.9 (1,558.1, 1,775.0) 28 (22, 34) 189 falling falling trend -4.1 (-9.1, -2.2)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 1,662.8 (1,449.4, 1,899.0) 29 (17, 37) 45 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.4)
Columbia County 6 Rural 1,641.6 (1,319.9, 2,018.2) 30 (13, 39) 18 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.5, 0.6)
Spokane County 6 Urban 1,641.3 (1,602.2, 1,681.0) 31 (26, 34) 1,392 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Wahkiakum County 6 Rural 1,570.0 (1,278.9, 1,908.1) 32 (16, 39) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.6)
Pend Oreille County 6 Rural 1,531.2 (1,343.3, 1,738.3) 33 (23, 38) 52 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.6, -1.9)
Garfield County 6 Rural 1,518.3 (1,092.2, 2,055.4) 34 (7, 39) 9 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.9, 1.8)
Skamania County 6 Urban 1,479.0 (1,267.3, 1,716.3) 35 (23, 39) 37 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.9, 1.5)
Asotin County 6 Urban 1,430.6 (1,289.2, 1,583.2) 36 (29, 39) 75 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.0, -0.6)
Stevens County 6 Urban 1,421.0 (1,318.7, 1,529.2) 37 (31, 38) 151 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.8, -2.0)
Ferry County 6 Rural 1,335.4 (1,106.8, 1,597.7) 38 (28, 39) 26 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.0, -0.4)
Whitman County 6 Rural 1,195.6 (1,063.0, 1,340.3) 39 (36, 39) 60 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.4, -2.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/13/2024 7:54 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
5 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
7 Source: SEER November 2023 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top