Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Washington by County

Pancreas (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington 5 *** 12.9 (12.6, 13.3) N/A 1,094 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.5, 1.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 13.1 (13.0, 13.1) N/A 50,510 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.7, 1.0)
Kittitas County 6 *** 18.6 (13.6, 25.0) 1 (1, 25) 10 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.3, 6.9)
Lincoln County 6 *** 16.2 (9.2, 28.5) 2 (1, 32) 3
*
*
Grays Harbor County 7 *** 15.6 (12.3, 19.7) 3 (1, 28) 17 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.6)
Mason County 7 *** 14.7 (11.4, 18.7) 4 (1, 30) 15 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.2)
Whatcom County 7 *** 14.6 (12.6, 17.0) 5 (1, 25) 38 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.3, 2.4)
Clallam County 7 *** 14.6 (11.8, 18.2) 6 (1, 29) 20 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.4)
Pend Oreille County 6 *** 14.1 (7.3, 25.5) 7 (1, 32) 3
*
*
Walla Walla County 6 *** 14.0 (10.5, 18.4) 8 (1, 31) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.1, 4.6)
Pierce County 7 *** 13.8 (12.7, 15.0) 9 (3, 24) 128 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.3, 1.0)
Thurston County 7 *** 13.6 (11.9, 15.6) 10 (2, 28) 46 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.6, 1.9)
Snohomish County 7 *** 13.4 (12.3, 14.6) 11 (5, 26) 113 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.3)
Spokane County 6 *** 13.3 (12.0, 14.8) 12 (4, 27) 80 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 2.9)
Grant County 6 *** 13.3 (10.3, 17.0) 13 (1, 31) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.4, 3.3)
Whitman County 6 *** 13.2 (8.5, 19.7) 14 (1, 32) 5
*
*
Clark County 6 *** 12.9 (11.6, 14.4) 15 (5, 28) 68 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9)
Skagit County 7 *** 12.9 (10.5, 15.7) 16 (2, 31) 22 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.0)
Jefferson County 7 *** 12.9 (9.1, 18.6) 17 (1, 32) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.7)
Island County 7 *** 12.8 (10.1, 16.1) 18 (2, 31) 17 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.7)
Okanogan County 6 *** 12.8 (8.9, 18.1) 19 (1, 32) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.3, 1.6)
King County 7 *** 12.7 (12.0, 13.4) 20 (10, 27) 282 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.2, 0.8)
Lewis County 6 *** 12.5 (9.9, 15.9) 21 (2, 31) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.2, 2.1)
Kitsap County 7 *** 12.5 (10.8, 14.3) 22 (6, 31) 43 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.9)
Franklin County 6 *** 12.5 (8.7, 17.2) 23 (1, 32) 8 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.8, 6.8)
Stevens County 6 *** 12.4 (8.9, 17.1) 24 (2, 32) 9 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.6, 2.0)
Asotin County 6 *** 12.3 (7.5, 19.4) 25 (1, 32) 4 stable stable trend 3.6 (-1.6, 9.0)
Yakima County 6 *** 12.1 (10.2, 14.2) 26 (5, 31) 31 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.4, 2.9)
Chelan County 6 *** 12.0 (9.1, 15.7) 27 (3, 32) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 1.1)
Pacific County 6 *** 12.0 (7.9, 18.7) 28 (1, 32) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.3, 3.9)
Cowlitz County 6 *** 12.0 (9.6, 14.9) 29 (4, 32) 18 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.5)
Benton County 6 *** 11.5 (9.6, 13.8) 30 (7, 32) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 2.8)
San Juan County 7 *** 9.7 (5.5, 17.9) 31 (2, 32) 4
*
*
Douglas County 6 *** 7.8 (4.6, 12.5) 32 (14, 32) 4 stable stable trend -3.6 (-7.9, 0.8)
Adams County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Columbia County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ferry County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Klickitat County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Skamania County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wahkiakum County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/16/2021 9:15 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Adams, Columbia, Ferry, Garfield, Klickitat, Skamania, Wahkiakum

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top