Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Washington by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington 5 *** 52.7 (52.0, 53.4) N/A 4,444 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.6, -2.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 57.3 (57.1, 57.4) N/A 222,811 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.8)
King County 7 *** 46.1 (44.8, 47.4) 26 (22, 32) 1,014 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.2, -2.2)
Pierce County 7 *** 66.8 (64.4, 69.2) 3 (1, 8) 612 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.3, -1.9)
Snohomish County 7 *** 58.2 (55.8, 60.6) 10 (5, 17) 477 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Spokane County 6 *** 51.9 (49.2, 54.6) 21 (12, 27) 312 falling falling trend -10.0 (-17.0, -2.4)
Clark County 6 *** 53.0 (50.1, 55.9) 20 (10, 26) 278 falling falling trend -9.2 (-15.3, -2.7)
Thurston County 7 *** 56.0 (52.4, 59.8) 13 (6, 23) 193 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.7)
Kitsap County 7 *** 56.3 (52.6, 60.1) 12 (6, 23) 187 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.3)
Whatcom County 7 *** 54.0 (50.1, 58.3) 19 (8, 26) 144 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.2)
Yakima County 6 *** 49.8 (45.9, 53.8) 23 (13, 31) 128 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.4)
Skagit County 7 *** 60.7 (55.6, 66.1) 8 (2, 19) 111 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Benton County 6 *** 47.0 (42.9, 51.4) 25 (17, 33) 101 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.5, -1.4)
Cowlitz County 6 *** 61.8 (56.1, 67.9) 6 (2, 19) 92 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.8)
Clallam County 7 *** 62.4 (56.5, 68.9) 4 (1, 17) 91 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Mason County 7 *** 75.0 (67.4, 83.3) 1 (1, 6) 77 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Grays Harbor County 7 *** 66.9 (60.1, 74.4) 2 (1, 14) 75 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.9, -2.8)
Island County 7 *** 49.2 (43.9, 55.1) 24 (11, 33) 67 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Lewis County 6 *** 54.3 (48.4, 60.8) 17 (5, 29) 64 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.3)
Grant County 6 *** 55.8 (49.3, 62.9) 14 (3, 28) 56 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.0)
Chelan County 6 *** 51.7 (45.5, 58.5) 22 (7, 31) 53 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.7)
Okanogan County 6 *** 59.5 (51.1, 69.0) 9 (1, 26) 39 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.5)
Walla Walla County 6 *** 43.8 (37.4, 51.2) 30 (15, 36) 34 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.3)
Jefferson County 7 *** 45.2 (38.0, 54.0) 28 (13, 36) 33 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Stevens County 6 *** 43.4 (36.6, 51.4) 31 (16, 36) 31 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.6, -0.6)
Douglas County 6 *** 54.1 (45.6, 63.9) 18 (3, 32) 29 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.5)
Pacific County 6 *** 61.7 (51.3, 74.4) 7 (1, 27) 28 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.2)
Franklin County 6 *** 38.2 (31.6, 45.7) 34 (23, 37) 25 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.6, -2.9)
Kittitas County 6 *** 37.8 (30.7, 46.3) 35 (23, 37) 20 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.2)
Klickitat County 6 *** 55.5 (44.7, 68.5) 15 (1, 33) 20 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.3, 7.5)
Asotin County 6 *** 45.3 (36.0, 56.7) 27 (7, 36) 17 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.3, 1.0)
San Juan County 7 *** 41.7 (32.0, 54.9) 33 (10, 37) 14 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Pend Oreille County 6 *** 54.9 (41.3, 72.6) 16 (1, 35) 13 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.5, -1.1)
Whitman County 6 *** 30.9 (23.4, 40.1) 36 (30, 37) 12 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.6, -0.3)
Skamania County 6 *** 58.2 (42.4, 78.7) 11 (1, 35) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.1, 4.6)
Adams County 6 *** 43.0 (29.7, 59.9) 32 (4, 37) 7 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.9, -0.3)
Lincoln County 6 *** 30.6 (20.7, 45.4) 37 (25, 37) 6 stable stable trend -4.5 (-9.8, 1.1)
Ferry County 6 *** 45.0 (29.1, 68.3) 29 (2, 37) 5 falling falling trend -6.9 (-11.9, -1.6)
Columbia County 6 *** 62.3 (38.6, 99.6) 5 (1, 37) 5 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.1, 2.2)
Garfield County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wahkiakum County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/27/2022 5:28 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Garfield, Wahkiakum

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top