Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for West Virginia by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
West Virginia 6 N/A 2,034.6 (2,013.4, 2,055.9) N/A 7,231 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 1,975.2 (1,973.5, 1,977.0) N/A 1,010,129 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Wirt County 6 Urban 2,129.7 (1,759.2, 2,557.9) 15 (1, 53) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.4)
Calhoun County 6 Rural 1,638.1 (1,358.7, 1,958.0) 52 (15, 55) 25 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.2)
Pendleton County 6 Rural 1,548.7 (1,293.8, 1,839.0) 54 (31, 55) 26 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.1, 2.8)
Gilmer County 6 Rural 2,116.5 (1,772.8, 2,506.9) 16 (1, 52) 27 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 2.1)
Doddridge County 6 Rural 1,878.9 (1,589.8, 2,205.7) 46 (3, 54) 31 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.5, 4.8)
Pleasants County 6 Rural 2,496.7 (2,138.6, 2,898.4) 1 (1, 37) 35 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.8)
Tyler County 6 Rural 1,883.9 (1,613.6, 2,186.4) 45 (3, 54) 35 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.6)
Pocahontas County 6 Rural 1,750.0 (1,502.6, 2,026.7) 49 (13, 54) 36 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 2.0)
Tucker County 6 Rural 2,052.9 (1,763.1, 2,376.9) 24 (1, 52) 36 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.2)
Webster County 6 Rural 1,899.6 (1,629.8, 2,201.4) 44 (4, 54) 37 falling falling trend -12.2 (-23.0, -1.2)
Hardy County 6 Rural 1,238.9 (1,067.4, 1,430.5) 55 (53, 55) 39 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.8)
Ritchie County 6 Rural 2,092.7 (1,805.5, 2,412.7) 18 (1, 51) 39 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Clay County 6 Urban 2,419.1 (2,095.2, 2,779.4) 2 (1, 40) 41 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Grant County 6 Rural 1,563.1 (1,355.5, 1,793.6) 53 (41, 55) 41 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.9)
Summers County 6 Rural 1,714.4 (1,511.0, 1,937.7) 50 (26, 54) 53 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.6)
Monroe County 6 Rural 1,806.3 (1,598.5, 2,033.8) 47 (14, 54) 55 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.9)
Braxton County 6 Rural 2,095.9 (1,864.0, 2,348.9) 17 (2, 49) 61 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.0)
Roane County 6 Rural 2,030.1 (1,808.2, 2,271.8) 30 (3, 50) 62 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.3)
Barbour County 6 Rural 2,049.6 (1,828.3, 2,290.5) 25 (3, 50) 64 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
McDowell County 6 Rural 1,641.0 (1,472.2, 1,824.0) 51 (40, 54) 71 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.6)
Taylor County 6 Rural 2,184.7 (1,963.2, 2,424.5) 11 (1, 46) 73 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 1.9)
Wetzel County 6 Rural 2,252.0 (2,028.9, 2,493.0) 6 (1, 42) 75 stable stable trend 0.8 (-7.3, 7.8)
Morgan County 6 Urban 1,917.6 (1,727.1, 2,123.6) 42 (8, 52) 76 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.4)
Lewis County 6 Rural 2,340.7 (2,116.7, 2,582.2) 3 (1, 34) 81 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 2,196.5 (1,993.2, 2,415.2) 9 (1, 43) 88 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.2, 9.9)
Wyoming County 6 Rural 2,004.1 (1,816.3, 2,206.1) 34 (5, 50) 90 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Hampshire County 6 Urban 1,783.5 (1,621.3, 1,957.7) 48 (26, 54) 93 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.0, 3.6)
Mingo County 6 Rural 2,046.3 (1,858.0, 2,248.8) 26 (3, 49) 94 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Boone County 6 Urban 2,146.6 (1,953.8, 2,353.6) 12 (1, 46) 97 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Brooke County 6 Urban 2,007.1 (1,838.2, 2,187.3) 33 (6, 49) 106 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Nicholas County 6 Rural 1,965.0 (1,799.5, 2,141.8) 39 (8, 50) 107 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Upshur County 6 Rural 2,195.9 (2,013.5, 2,390.6) 10 (1, 42) 108 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Mineral County 6 Rural 1,936.9 (1,778.3, 2,106.0) 41 (11, 51) 113 stable stable trend 5.1 (-2.8, 10.2)
Jackson County 6 Rural 2,201.6 (2,029.7, 2,384.1) 8 (1, 40) 123 stable stable trend 2.2 (0.0, 6.4)
Mason County 6 Rural 2,340.7 (2,159.1, 2,533.4) 4 (1, 26) 125 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.6)
Preston County 6 Urban 1,970.8 (1,819.1, 2,132.0) 38 (9, 49) 129 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Randolph County 6 Rural 2,136.3 (1,973.8, 2,308.7) 14 (2, 44) 129 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Marshall County 6 Urban 1,950.9 (1,803.1, 2,107.8) 40 (11, 50) 133 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Hancock County 6 Urban 2,041.3 (1,889.0, 2,202.5) 27 (6, 47) 137 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.5, 6.2)
Logan County 6 Rural 2,245.3 (2,081.7, 2,418.5) 7 (1, 33) 148 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Greenbrier County 6 Rural 2,003.3 (1,863.2, 2,151.2) 35 (8, 48) 154 falling falling trend -1.2 (-3.8, -0.4)
Wayne County 6 Urban 2,082.6 (1,944.9, 2,227.6) 21 (4, 44) 172 stable stable trend 1.4 (-4.8, 7.4)
Fayette County 6 Urban 2,007.3 (1,873.8, 2,147.8) 32 (8, 48) 173 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Ohio County 6 Urban 2,013.2 (1,882.1, 2,151.0) 31 (8, 47) 182 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.4)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 2,034.9 (1,903.2, 2,173.4) 28 (7, 47) 188 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.1)
Marion County 6 Rural 2,030.5 (1,910.7, 2,155.9) 29 (8, 46) 218 falling falling trend -1.7 (-7.3, -0.4)
Putnam County 6 Urban 2,141.8 (2,016.2, 2,273.3) 13 (3, 39) 222 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Mercer County 6 Rural 1,905.1 (1,799.4, 2,015.5) 43 (21, 50) 248 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -1.4)
Monongalia County 6 Urban 1,997.6 (1,887.4, 2,112.6) 36 (11, 47) 259 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Harrison County 6 Rural 2,268.8 (2,152.1, 2,390.1) 5 (1, 21) 289 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Raleigh County 6 Urban 1,972.1 (1,872.3, 2,075.8) 37 (14, 47) 303 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.5)
Wood County 6 Urban 2,053.7 (1,958.3, 2,152.6) 23 (9, 42) 352 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.5, 5.8)
Berkeley County 6 Urban 2,060.6 (1,962.3, 2,162.6) 22 (9, 43) 354 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Cabell County 6 Urban 2,087.0 (1,992.8, 2,184.6) 19 (7, 40) 373 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Kanawha County 6 Urban 2,082.9 (2,017.0, 2,150.3) 20 (10, 36) 779 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/09/2024 6:33 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top