Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for West Virginia by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
West Virginia 6 N/A 8.2 (7.7, 8.7) N/A 221 rising rising trend 4.2 (3.2, 5.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 35,841 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.6)
Berkeley County 6 Urban 9.9 (7.8, 12.5) 5 (1, 19) 16 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.4, 7.3)
Cabell County 6 Urban 10.5 (8.0, 13.5) 3 (1, 19) 13 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.3, 7.8)
Fayette County 6 Urban 8.6 (5.6, 12.9) 12 (1, 25) 5 rising rising trend 5.8 (0.2, 13.4)
Greenbrier County 6 Rural 6.8 (3.7, 11.7) 22 (2, 25) 3
*
*
Hampshire County 6 Urban 9.1 (5.1, 15.7) 9 (1, 25) 3
*
*
Harrison County 6 Rural 7.9 (5.6, 10.9) 19 (3, 25) 8 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.7, 8.3)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 7.3 (4.9, 10.8) 20 (3, 25) 6 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.3, 6.8)
Kanawha County 6 Urban 8.9 (7.4, 10.7) 11 (3, 20) 26 rising rising trend 4.1 (2.3, 6.5)
Logan County 6 Rural 8.0 (4.6, 13.2) 16 (1, 25) 4
*
*
Marion County 6 Rural 7.2 (4.8, 10.6) 21 (4, 25) 6 stable stable trend 4.3 (-0.8, 11.2)
Mason County 6 Rural 9.7 (5.5, 16.1) 6 (1, 25) 4
*
*
Mercer County 6 Rural 8.0 (5.5, 11.3) 17 (2, 25) 7 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.3, 10.0)
Mineral County 6 Rural 10.1 (6.1, 16.1) 4 (1, 25) 4
*
*
Mingo County 6 Rural 9.1 (5.1, 15.4) 10 (1, 25) 3 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.6, 9.3)
Monongalia County 6 Urban 7.9 (5.6, 10.9) 18 (3, 25) 8 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.5, 8.5)
Morgan County 6 Urban 10.7 (6.2, 18.4) 2 (1, 25) 3
*
*
Nicholas County 6 Rural 9.6 (5.9, 15.4) 7 (1, 25) 4
*
*
Ohio County 6 Urban 6.6 (4.0, 10.4) 24 (4, 25) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-7.0, 4.8)
Preston County 6 Urban 8.5 (5.2, 13.3) 14 (1, 25) 4
*
*
Putnam County 6 Urban 6.6 (4.3, 9.8) 23 (6, 25) 5
*
*
Raleigh County 6 Urban 6.0 (4.1, 8.5) 25 (11, 25) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.1, 4.7)
Randolph County 6 Rural 8.5 (5.2, 13.7) 13 (1, 25) 4
*
*
Wayne County 6 Urban 9.3 (6.1, 14.0) 8 (1, 25) 6 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.9, 9.2)
Wood County 6 Urban 8.1 (6.0, 10.9) 15 (3, 25) 11 rising rising trend 5.3 (1.0, 11.2)
Wyoming County 6 Rural 12.6 (7.5, 20.3) 1 (1, 23) 4
*
*
Barbour County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Boone County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Braxton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooke County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Doddridge County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilmer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardy County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDowell County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pendleton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pleasants County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pocahontas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ritchie County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roane County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Summers County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tucker County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyler County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upshur County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wetzel County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wirt County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/14/2024 1:45 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Barbour, Boone, Braxton, Brooke, Calhoun, Clay, Doddridge, Gilmer, Grant, Hancock, Hardy, Jackson, Lewis, Lincoln, Marshall, McDowell, Monroe, Pendleton, Pleasants, Pocahontas, Ritchie, Roane, Summers, Taylor, Tucker, Tyler, Upshur, Webster, Wetzel, Wirt

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top