Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for West Virginia by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
West Virginia 6 *** 20.8 (19.9, 21.6) N/A 507 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.8, 3.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 17.1 (17.0, 17.1) N/A 64,622 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Nicholas County 6 *** 15.3 (9.9, 22.9) 41 (9, 41) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.8, 5.0)
Ohio County 6 *** 15.3 (11.0, 21.0) 40 (16, 41) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.7, 3.5)
Mercer County 6 *** 15.7 (11.8, 20.5) 39 (17, 41) 13 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.0, 5.1)
Wetzel County 6 *** 15.7 (9.1, 25.9) 38 (5, 41) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.9, 4.5)
Mineral County 6 *** 16.7 (11.5, 24.0) 37 (8, 41) 7 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.6, 5.2)
Monongalia County 6 *** 17.9 (14.2, 22.1) 36 (13, 41) 18 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.7, 4.1)
Fayette County 6 *** 17.9 (13.4, 23.6) 35 (9, 41) 12 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.3, 7.4)
Upshur County 6 *** 18.1 (12.0, 26.5) 34 (4, 41) 6 stable stable trend 2.5 (-3.0, 8.2)
Lewis County 6 *** 18.5 (11.4, 29.1) 33 (3, 41) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.5, 3.5)
Hancock County 6 *** 18.6 (12.8, 26.2) 32 (4, 41) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-4.2, 6.3)
Monroe County 6 *** 18.6 (11.5, 29.6) 31 (3, 41) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-7.1, 5.2)
Jefferson County 6 *** 18.7 (14.4, 23.9) 30 (9, 41) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.4, 2.7)
Berkeley County 6 *** 18.8 (15.4, 22.6) 29 (11, 40) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 1.8)
Marion County 6 *** 18.9 (14.4, 24.3) 28 (7, 41) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 3.6)
McDowell County 6 *** 19.2 (12.5, 28.7) 27 (3, 41) 6 stable stable trend 2.0 (-3.2, 7.5)
Harrison County 6 *** 19.9 (16.0, 24.6) 26 (7, 40) 19 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 3.4)
Greenbrier County 6 *** 20.0 (14.6, 26.8) 25 (4, 41) 11 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.1, 6.6)
Wood County 6 *** 20.6 (16.8, 25.0) 24 (7, 39) 23 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.4, 3.1)
Roane County 6 *** 20.8 (12.5, 33.0) 23 (1, 41) 4 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.6, 7.3)
Marshall County 6 *** 20.9 (14.5, 29.2) 22 (2, 41) 8 rising rising trend 7.1 (3.1, 11.2)
Raleigh County 6 *** 20.9 (17.0, 25.6) 21 (6, 39) 21 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.6, 6.9)
Grant County 6 *** 21.8 (12.8, 35.6) 20 (1, 41) 4
*
*
Putnam County 6 *** 22.3 (17.5, 27.9) 19 (3, 38) 16 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.0, 4.5)
Cabell County 6 *** 22.3 (18.6, 26.6) 18 (4, 34) 27 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.1, 6.8)
Wayne County 6 *** 22.7 (17.4, 29.2) 17 (3, 38) 13 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.4, 7.1)
Kanawha County 6 *** 23.0 (20.3, 26.0) 16 (5, 29) 58 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.4, 4.6)
Wyoming County 6 *** 23.2 (15.8, 33.1) 15 (1, 41) 7 stable stable trend 4.8 (-0.5, 10.3)
Morgan County 6 *** 23.2 (15.1, 34.5) 14 (1, 41) 6 stable stable trend 3.6 (-1.1, 8.6)
Hampshire County 6 *** 23.7 (16.6, 33.1) 13 (1, 40) 8 stable stable trend 4.0 (-0.4, 8.5)
Brooke County 6 *** 23.8 (16.2, 33.9) 12 (1, 41) 7
*
*
Taylor County 6 *** 23.8 (15.8, 35.1) 11 (1, 41) 6
*
*
Preston County 6 *** 24.0 (17.7, 31.8) 10 (1, 38) 11 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.7, 6.3)
Randolph County 6 *** 24.7 (18.1, 33.3) 9 (1, 39) 10 rising rising trend 6.5 (1.2, 12.1)
Mason County 6 *** 25.1 (18.2, 33.9) 8 (1, 38) 10 rising rising trend 4.6 (0.7, 8.5)
Jackson County 6 *** 25.1 (18.6, 33.4) 7 (1, 38) 11 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.4, 6.8)
Boone County 6 *** 26.4 (18.3, 37.2) 6 (1, 39) 8 rising rising trend 5.1 (0.6, 9.9)
Braxton County 6 *** 27.5 (17.8, 41.2) 5 (1, 40) 6
*
*
Logan County 6 *** 28.8 (21.8, 37.4) 4 (1, 29) 13 rising rising trend 5.9 (2.0, 9.9)
Mingo County 6 *** 29.2 (21.0, 39.6) 3 (1, 34) 9 stable stable trend 3.4 (0.0, 6.9)
Ritchie County 6 *** 31.4 (18.7, 50.1) 2 (1, 40) 4
*
*
Lincoln County 6 *** 34.1 (24.5, 46.3) 1 (1, 25) 9 rising rising trend 6.8 (2.7, 11.0)
Barbour County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Doddridge County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilmer County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardy County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pendleton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pleasants County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pocahontas County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Summers County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tucker County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyler County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wirt County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/17/2022 2:50 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Barbour, Calhoun, Clay, Doddridge, Gilmer, Hardy, Pendleton, Pleasants, Pocahontas, Summers, Tucker, Tyler, Webster, Wirt

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top