Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for West Virginia by County

Thyroid (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
West Virginia 6 N/A 16.3 (15.5, 17.2) N/A 319 stable stable trend -2.2 (-7.0, 0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 12.9 (12.9, 13.0) N/A 44,379 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.9)
Monongalia County 6 Urban 16.2 (12.7, 20.4) 18 (7, 30) 16 falling falling trend -22.2 (-33.5, -5.8)
Boone County 6 Urban 28.3 (18.8, 40.7) 3 (1, 21) 6 stable stable trend -18.9 (-34.6, 9.6)
Marshall County 6 Urban 12.0 (7.3, 18.8) 30 (9, 34) 5 falling falling trend -13.7 (-29.0, -6.8)
Kanawha County 6 Urban 24.1 (21.0, 27.5) 4 (2, 11) 49 stable stable trend -10.8 (-26.4, 5.5)
Brooke County 6 Urban 16.2 (9.6, 25.8) 17 (3, 34) 4 stable stable trend -9.0 (-46.0, 0.5)
Wood County 6 Urban 10.8 (8.0, 14.4) 32 (17, 34) 10 stable stable trend -6.9 (-20.4, 0.9)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 22.3 (13.9, 33.8) 6 (1, 31) 5 stable stable trend -4.7 (-50.8, 3.3)
Wayne County 6 Urban 13.4 (8.7, 19.8) 25 (7, 34) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-7.6, 4.1)
Berkeley County 6 Urban 10.3 (7.9, 13.3) 34 (20, 34) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-14.3, 3.1)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 10.6 (7.1, 15.2) 33 (15, 34) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.2, 4.8)
Raleigh County 6 Urban 11.5 (8.3, 15.4) 31 (15, 34) 10 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.9, 6.6)
Nicholas County 6 Rural 16.6 (10.2, 25.5) 16 (3, 34) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.7, 7.6)
Mineral County 6 Rural 12.7 (7.3, 20.6) 27 (6, 34) 4 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.3, 8.0)
Harrison County 6 Rural 17.2 (13.1, 22.3) 13 (5, 30) 13 stable stable trend 2.7 (-2.3, 8.5)
Cabell County 6 Urban 14.8 (11.5, 18.7) 21 (9, 32) 15 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.8, 7.7)
Jackson County 6 Rural 17.4 (11.1, 26.0) 12 (3, 34) 5 stable stable trend 3.2 (-2.3, 9.7)
Mason County 6 Rural 15.3 (9.1, 24.1) 19 (4, 34) 4 stable stable trend 3.5 (-1.9, 9.9)
Hancock County 6 Urban 19.5 (12.7, 28.6) 9 (2, 32) 6 stable stable trend 3.7 (-2.1, 10.5)
Mercer County 6 Rural 13.6 (9.8, 18.5) 23 (9, 34) 9 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.7, 6.7)
Wyoming County 6 Rural 18.2 (11.1, 28.2) 10 (2, 34) 5 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.4, 9.3)
Marion County 6 Rural 12.7 (8.7, 17.7) 28 (10, 34) 7 rising rising trend 5.1 (0.2, 11.4)
Logan County 6 Rural 32.3 (24.1, 42.4) 2 (1, 10) 12 rising rising trend 6.3 (2.8, 10.6)
Greenbrier County 6 Rural 17.0 (11.0, 25.0) 14 (3, 34) 6 rising rising trend 6.7 (2.8, 11.4)
Fayette County 6 Urban 22.0 (15.9, 29.7) 7 (1, 25) 9 rising rising trend 8.6 (5.1, 13.4)
Ohio County 6 Urban 16.8 (11.6, 23.6) 15 (4, 33) 8 stable stable trend 9.8 (-7.8, 35.5)
Clay County 6 Urban 36.7 (20.6, 60.8) 1 (1, 26) 4
*
*
Hampshire County 6 Urban 13.2 (7.5, 21.8) 26 (5, 34) 4
*
*
Mingo County 6 Rural 13.5 (7.6, 22.1) 24 (5, 34) 4
*
*
Preston County 6 Urban 15.3 (10.0, 22.3) 20 (5, 34) 6
*
*
Putnam County 6 Urban 22.8 (17.6, 28.9) 5 (1, 19) 15
*
*
Randolph County 6 Rural 13.9 (8.6, 21.5) 22 (5, 34) 5
*
*
Roane County 6 Rural 21.4 (12.5, 34.6) 8 (1, 34) 4
*
*
Taylor County 6 Rural 17.9 (10.1, 29.4) 11 (2, 34) 3
*
*
Upshur County 6 Rural 12.2 (6.8, 20.2) 29 (6, 34) 3
*
*
Barbour County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Braxton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Doddridge County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilmer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardy County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDowell County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pendleton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pleasants County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pocahontas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ritchie County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Summers County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tucker County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyler County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wetzel County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wirt County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/14/2024 12:24 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Barbour, Braxton, Calhoun, Doddridge, Gilmer, Grant, Hardy, Lewis, McDowell, Monroe, Morgan, Pendleton, Pleasants, Pocahontas, Ritchie, Summers, Tucker, Tyler, Webster, Wetzel, Wirt

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top