Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for West Virginia by County

Leukemia (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
West Virginia 6 15.3 (14.5, 16.0) N/A 368 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 0.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 13.9 (13.9, 14.0) N/A 51,518 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.4)
Marshall County 6 11.7 (7.5, 17.8) 35 (8, 35) 5
*
*
Wood County 6 12.1 (9.3, 15.6) 34 (15, 35) 14 falling falling trend -7.1 (-22.2, -0.6)
Berkeley County 6 12.3 (9.7, 15.4) 33 (15, 35) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.9, 3.4)
Ohio County 6 13.4 (9.3, 18.8) 32 (6, 35) 8 stable stable trend 2.5 (-2.8, 8.9)
Hancock County 6 13.8 (9.0, 20.6) 31 (4, 35) 6 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.4, 0.6)
Jefferson County 6 14.0 (10.2, 18.8) 30 (6, 35) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.8, 5.9)
McDowell County 6 14.6 (8.3, 24.2) 29 (2, 35) 4
*
*
Putnam County 6 14.8 (10.9, 19.6) 28 (5, 35) 10 stable stable trend -4.9 (-31.0, 3.4)
Mineral County 6 14.8 (9.8, 21.8) 27 (3, 35) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.6, 4.5)
Cabell County 6 15.0 (12.0, 18.6) 26 (6, 34) 19 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.5, 4.5)
Mercer County 6 15.1 (11.3, 19.7) 25 (5, 35) 12 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.5, 1.5)
Upshur County 6 15.5 (9.8, 23.5) 24 (2, 35) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-9.2, 6.1)
Preston County 6 15.5 (10.5, 22.1) 23 (3, 35) 7 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.5, 6.1)
Wyoming County 6 15.6 (9.8, 24.1) 22 (2, 35) 5 stable stable trend -3.3 (-9.6, 2.9)
Kanawha County 6 15.8 (13.5, 18.3) 21 (7, 32) 40 stable stable trend -10.0 (-19.8, 1.2)
Logan County 6 15.8 (10.8, 22.6) 20 (2, 35) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.9, 4.2)
Wayne County 6 16.0 (11.5, 21.9) 19 (3, 35) 9 rising rising trend 4.5 (1.4, 8.2)
Marion County 6 16.2 (12.1, 21.3) 18 (3, 35) 11 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.8, 6.7)
Monongalia County 6 16.5 (13.0, 20.7) 17 (3, 33) 16 rising rising trend 5.2 (1.7, 15.3)
Summers County 6 16.7 (9.0, 29.0) 16 (1, 35) 3 stable stable trend 1.5 (-5.7, 10.3)
Randolph County 6 16.7 (10.9, 24.5) 15 (1, 35) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.7, 1.5)
Greenbrier County 6 16.9 (11.5, 23.9) 14 (1, 35) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.5, 2.4)
Nicholas County 6 17.4 (11.5, 25.6) 13 (1, 35) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-4.5, 7.4)
Fayette County 6 17.4 (12.7, 23.3) 12 (2, 34) 10 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.8, 5.4)
Raleigh County 6 17.5 (14.0, 21.8) 11 (3, 31) 18 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.7, 4.7)
Boone County 6 17.8 (11.1, 27.2) 10 (1, 35) 5 stable stable trend -5.6 (-31.2, 1.3)
Jackson County 6 17.8 (12.1, 25.4) 9 (1, 35) 7
*
*
Mingo County 6 17.8 (11.5, 26.6) 8 (1, 35) 6 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.5, 7.4)
Harrison County 6 18.6 (14.6, 23.4) 7 (2, 30) 16 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.7, 3.8)
Wetzel County 6 18.6 (10.3, 31.2) 6 (1, 35) 3 stable stable trend 3.1 (-3.0, 10.2)
Lewis County 6 19.5 (12.1, 30.3) 5 (1, 35) 5 stable stable trend 2.7 (-2.2, 9.0)
Lincoln County 6 19.9 (13.2, 29.3) 4 (1, 34) 6 stable stable trend 15.8 (-4.6, 57.5)
Taylor County 6 22.8 (14.4, 34.8) 3 (1, 33) 5
*
*
Mason County 6 25.6 (19.0, 34.3) 2 (1, 19) 10 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.1, 8.5)
Pocahontas County 6 26.3 (13.6, 46.7) 1 (1, 35) 3
*
*
Barbour County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Braxton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooke County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Doddridge County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilmer County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hampshire County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardy County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pendleton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pleasants County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ritchie County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roane County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tucker County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyler County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wirt County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/27/2024 8:38 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Barbour, Braxton, Brooke, Calhoun, Clay, Doddridge, Gilmer, Grant, Hampshire, Hardy, Monroe, Morgan, Pendleton, Pleasants, Ritchie, Roane, Tucker, Tyler, Webster, Wirt

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top