Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin 6 7.4 (7.1, 7.6) N/A 565 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.7, 2.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 35,262 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Ozaukee County 6 4.8 (3.3, 6.9) 45 (19, 45) 7 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.9, 7.7)
Polk County 6 4.9 (2.7, 8.5) 44 (8, 45) 3 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.9, 4.6)
Calumet County 6 5.0 (2.9, 8.2) 43 (11, 45) 3
*
*
St. Croix County 6 5.1 (3.4, 7.5) 42 (13, 45) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.5, 3.6)
Marathon County 6 5.2 (3.8, 7.1) 41 (18, 45) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.5, 3.7)
Waupaca County 6 5.3 (3.1, 8.5) 40 (8, 45) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.3, 3.7)
Waukesha County 6 5.3 (4.5, 6.2) 39 (26, 45) 30 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.8, 3.0)
Outagamie County 6 5.5 (4.2, 7.2) 38 (16, 45) 12 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.8, 5.6)
Manitowoc County 6 5.6 (3.9, 8.0) 37 (10, 45) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.0, 6.9)
Shawano County 6 5.9 (3.6, 9.6) 36 (5, 45) 4
*
*
Oneida County 6 6.0 (3.4, 10.3) 35 (3, 45) 4 stable stable trend -5.2 (-10.3, 0.2)
Chippewa County 6 6.4 (4.3, 9.4) 34 (5, 45) 6 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.1, 5.8)
Brown County 6 6.5 (5.2, 7.9) 33 (11, 43) 19 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.5, 5.7)
Eau Claire County 6 6.5 (4.5, 9.0) 32 (6, 45) 8
*
*
Sheboygan County 6 6.5 (4.8, 8.7) 31 (7, 44) 10 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.1, 5.0)
Marinette County 6 6.5 (4.0, 10.5) 30 (2, 45) 4
*
*
Pierce County 6 6.6 (3.7, 10.9) 29 (1, 45) 3
*
*
Winnebago County 6 6.6 (5.1, 8.4) 28 (9, 44) 14 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.5, 5.1)
Wood County 6 6.7 (4.7, 9.4) 27 (5, 45) 8 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.0, 7.1)
Douglas County 6 6.7 (4.0, 10.8) 26 (2, 45) 4 stable stable trend 2.5 (-2.9, 8.3)
Washington County 6 6.9 (5.3, 9.0) 25 (6, 44) 13 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.6, 7.8)
Fond du Lac County 6 7.0 (5.1, 9.4) 24 (5, 44) 10 stable stable trend 4.2 (0.0, 8.5)
Monroe County 6 7.0 (4.3, 10.9) 23 (2, 45) 4
*
*
Green County 6 7.1 (4.2, 11.5) 22 (1, 45) 4
*
*
Portage County 6 7.1 (4.7, 10.4) 21 (2, 45) 6
*
*
Vernon County 6 7.2 (4.1, 12.2) 20 (1, 45) 3
*
*
Sauk County 6 7.6 (5.3, 10.7) 19 (2, 44) 7
*
*
Barron County 6 7.7 (5.1, 11.4) 18 (1, 45) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.3, 4.2)
Dane County 6 7.7 (6.7, 8.9) 17 (7, 32) 45 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.5, 5.2)
La Crosse County 6 7.8 (5.9, 10.3) 16 (2, 41) 11 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.1, 6.9)
Rock County 6 7.8 (6.2, 9.8) 15 (4, 37) 17 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.1, 6.7)
Racine County 6 8.0 (6.5, 9.8) 14 (4, 35) 21 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.0, 5.5)
Kenosha County 6 8.2 (6.5, 10.2) 13 (2, 37) 17 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.3, 6.7)
Dunn County 6 8.3 (4.9, 13.1) 12 (1, 45) 4
*
*
Trempealeau County 6 8.6 (5.0, 14.0) 11 (1, 45) 4
*
*
Oconto County 6 8.8 (5.7, 13.3) 10 (1, 44) 5
*
*
Walworth County 6 9.0 (6.8, 11.6) 9 (1, 34) 12 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.4, 6.6)
Jefferson County 6 9.2 (6.8, 12.2) 8 (1, 36) 10 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.3, 8.9)
Grant County 6 9.4 (6.3, 13.6) 7 (1, 42) 6 stable stable trend 3.4 (-3.6, 10.9)
Sawyer County 6 10.0 (5.6, 17.8) 6 (1, 45) 3
*
*
Milwaukee County 6 10.2 (9.4, 11.1) 5 (1, 12) 111 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.2, 4.8)
Dodge County 6 10.3 (7.9, 13.4) 4 (1, 27) 13 rising rising trend 6.9 (3.2, 10.8)
Columbia County 6 10.4 (7.3, 14.4) 3 (1, 34) 8 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.4, 7.3)
Juneau County 6 10.8 (6.9, 16.6) 2 (1, 41) 5
*
*
Vilas County 6 11.5 (7.1, 18.6) 1 (1, 39) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.1, 5.2)
Adams County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashland County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bayfield County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buffalo County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Burnett County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Door County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Florence County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Green Lake County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iowa County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kewaunee County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Langlade County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marquette County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pepin County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Price County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richland County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rusk County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washburn County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Waushara County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/29/2022 5:09 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2021 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top