Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin 6 470.8 (468.5, 473.1) N/A 34,173 falling falling trend -0.2 (-0.3, -0.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 449.4 (449.1, 449.7) N/A 1,728,431 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Pepin County 6 352.1 (302.1, 409.1) 72 (55, 72) 39 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.4)
Pierce County 6 352.8 (328.4, 378.6) 71 (67, 72) 167 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 2.1)
St. Croix County 6 386.9 (369.3, 405.1) 70 (62, 72) 385 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Dunn County 6 387.5 (363.1, 413.2) 69 (59, 72) 201 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Polk County 6 408.6 (386.1, 432.3) 68 (51, 71) 267 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.5)
Menominee County 6 408.8 (331.2, 499.9) 67 (1, 72) 21 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.9, -1.2)
Taylor County 6 412.9 (378.3, 450.1) 66 (34, 72) 116 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Richland County 6 413.2 (377.9, 451.3) 65 (34, 71) 114 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Buffalo County 6 417.2 (376.6, 461.6) 64 (16, 72) 85 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Iowa County 6 417.2 (384.5, 452.3) 63 (31, 71) 131 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.1, 0.0)
Calumet County 6 417.5 (393.9, 442.2) 62 (44, 70) 248 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.1)
Portage County 6 419.2 (399.2, 439.9) 61 (48, 69) 354 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Green County 6 419.5 (393.4, 447.0) 60 (38, 70) 209 falling falling trend -6.2 (-12.0, -0.1)
Eau Claire County 6 431.1 (413.9, 448.8) 59 (41, 67) 505 stable stable trend -5.1 (-11.2, 1.4)
Bayfield County 6 431.3 (393.9, 472.1) 58 (15, 70) 119 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.3, 1.3)
Jackson County 6 431.8 (396.9, 469.2) 57 (19, 70) 121 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.1)
Dodge County 6 439.5 (422.2, 457.4) 56 (37, 66) 514 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Vernon County 6 440.1 (410.9, 471.0) 55 (20, 68) 188 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Kewaunee County 6 442.5 (407.4, 480.0) 54 (14, 70) 129 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.5)
Jefferson County 6 443.9 (425.6, 462.8) 53 (32, 65) 473 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.7)
Sauk County 6 446.4 (425.7, 467.9) 52 (27, 65) 377 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Shawano County 6 446.9 (422.1, 472.8) 51 (21, 67) 269 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.3)
Outagamie County 6 447.3 (434.4, 460.4) 50 (34, 61) 964 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Dane County 6 451.0 (443.0, 459.1) 49 (38, 58) 2,537 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
La Crosse County 6 453.7 (437.5, 470.5) 48 (27, 61) 632 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.2, 5.5)
Wood County 6 457.8 (438.9, 477.4) 47 (19, 61) 484 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Washburn County 6 457.9 (419.5, 499.5) 46 (3, 68) 126 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.4, 0.4)
Sheboygan County 6 463.1 (447.4, 479.2) 45 (18, 57) 702 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Winnebago County 6 463.4 (450.0, 477.2) 44 (21, 55) 956 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Marathon County 6 465.4 (450.8, 480.4) 43 (19, 56) 817 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Douglas County 6 466.7 (441.2, 493.5) 42 (7, 61) 270 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.8, 1.2)
Waupaca County 6 467.6 (444.9, 491.3) 41 (8, 59) 351 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Monroe County 6 468.7 (443.3, 495.4) 40 (6, 60) 270 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Crawford County 6 470.6 (430.1, 514.2) 39 (1, 66) 115 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Florence County 6 470.6 (394.4, 560.0) 38 (1, 71) 35 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.1)
Barron County 6 471.6 (447.4, 496.8) 37 (6, 58) 318 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 0.9)
Clark County 6 472.6 (442.8, 503.9) 36 (4, 60) 201 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Lincoln County 6 472.8 (442.8, 504.6) 35 (3, 61) 205 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.7)
Rusk County 6 473.2 (430.3, 519.7) 34 (1, 65) 106 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.0, -0.1)
Chippewa County 6 473.8 (452.6, 495.9) 33 (6, 55) 398 stable stable trend -3.8 (-8.8, 1.5)
Brown County 6 475.9 (464.6, 487.5) 32 (14, 45) 1,415 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
Waushara County 6 476.6 (444.8, 510.4) 31 (2, 61) 191 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.9, 2.9)
Grant County 6 479.7 (454.7, 505.8) 30 (3, 55) 302 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.6)
Oconto County 6 479.8 (452.6, 508.3) 29 (3, 57) 262 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Door County 6 480.9 (451.4, 512.2) 28 (2, 57) 247 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Trempealeau County 6 480.9 (449.5, 514.0) 27 (2, 58) 187 stable stable trend 2.8 (0.0, 5.6)
Columbia County 6 480.9 (458.4, 504.4) 26 (4, 52) 366 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Rock County 6 481.3 (467.4, 495.4) 25 (7, 45) 966 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Ozaukee County 6 484.2 (466.2, 502.7) 24 (5, 46) 600 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Burnett County 6 486.8 (446.3, 530.7) 23 (1, 62) 136 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.9)
Manitowoc County 6 488.7 (469.8, 508.3) 22 (3, 44) 558 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Waukesha County 6 489.3 (480.7, 498.1) 21 (7, 34) 2,655 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.1)
Iron County 6 489.7 (429.7, 558.6) 20 (1, 67) 58 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.3)
Forest County 6 490.0 (437.5, 548.0) 19 (1, 65) 72 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6)
Green Lake County 6 490.4 (452.9, 530.5) 18 (1, 60) 142 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Lafayette County 6 490.5 (447.7, 536.5) 17 (1, 63) 108 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.7)
Washington County 6 490.6 (475.8, 505.8) 16 (5, 39) 886 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.1)
Fond du Lac County 6 491.1 (473.9, 508.8) 15 (3, 42) 665 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.3)
Ashland County 6 492.1 (449.7, 537.8) 14 (1, 61) 108 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 2.3)
Kenosha County 6 493.7 (479.4, 508.4) 13 (3, 36) 950 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Sawyer County 6 495.6 (455.7, 538.6) 12 (1, 58) 139 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Walworth County 6 495.7 (478.3, 513.6) 11 (2, 38) 659 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.7)
Adams County 6 496.0 (460.6, 534.0) 10 (1, 57) 186 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Milwaukee County 6 496.2 (490.0, 502.6) 9 (6, 25) 5,046 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.2, 0.0)
Juneau County 6 497.7 (465.6, 531.7) 8 (1, 52) 193 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Marquette County 6 502.7 (461.4, 547.3) 7 (1, 56) 129 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.5)
Vilas County 6 504.3 (470.7, 540.3) 6 (1, 50) 218 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.6, -0.3)
Price County 6 513.9 (470.8, 560.8) 5 (1, 54) 122 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.0)
Racine County 6 514.2 (501.1, 527.4) 4 (1, 18) 1,258 stable stable trend 0.4 (0.0, 0.7)
Marinette County 6 522.2 (496.1, 549.6) 3 (1, 29) 345 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.2, 1.5)
Oneida County 6 523.2 (495.7, 552.1) 2 (1, 26) 321 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Langlade County 6 523.9 (485.3, 565.3) 1 (1, 43) 160 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.0, 3.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/06/2023 9:52 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2021 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top