Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin 6 465.5 (463.2, 467.8) N/A 34,387 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.2, 0.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 442.3 (442.0, 442.6) N/A 1,698,328 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
Milwaukee County 6 487.0 (480.9, 493.3) 19 (10, 30) 5,001 falling falling trend -0.4 (-1.2, -0.1)
Waukesha County 6 485.1 (476.6, 493.7) 21 (10, 33) 2,686 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.2, 2.3)
Dane County 6 443.5 (435.6, 451.4) 51 (39, 58) 2,562 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
Brown County 6 471.2 (460.1, 482.6) 30 (17, 44) 1,433 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Racine County 6 504.0 (491.2, 517.1) 6 (3, 23) 1,251 stable stable trend 0.4 (0.0, 1.0)
Rock County 6 495.8 (481.9, 510.1) 12 (4, 31) 1,013 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.9)
Outagamie County 6 441.3 (428.7, 454.2) 53 (36, 61) 972 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Kenosha County 6 492.5 (478.4, 507.0) 13 (5, 33) 967 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.6)
Winnebago County 6 456.3 (443.1, 469.9) 44 (25, 56) 958 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Washington County 6 487.5 (472.8, 502.5) 18 (5, 37) 899 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Marathon County 6 459.7 (445.3, 474.6) 41 (21, 55) 818 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 2.0)
Sheboygan County 6 459.8 (444.2, 475.8) 40 (20, 56) 709 falling falling trend -1.1 (-4.2, -0.4)
Walworth County 6 489.2 (472.1, 506.8) 17 (5, 39) 667 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.9, 4.9)
Fond du Lac County 6 467.2 (450.6, 484.3) 33 (12, 53) 645 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
La Crosse County 6 447.5 (431.5, 463.9) 48 (27, 60) 635 stable stable trend 2.2 (0.0, 3.5)
Ozaukee County 6 482.3 (464.5, 500.7) 23 (5, 44) 610 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.4, 3.6)
Manitowoc County 6 480.8 (462.2, 500.0) 25 (6, 47) 562 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Dodge County 6 442.1 (424.9, 460.0) 52 (31, 62) 527 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.0, 0.0)
Wood County 6 454.6 (435.8, 474.0) 46 (19, 59) 488 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Jefferson County 6 445.4 (427.3, 464.2) 49 (28, 61) 486 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Eau Claire County 6 400.6 (384.2, 417.5) 65 (56, 70) 479 stable stable trend -4.8 (-9.4, 0.0)
St. Croix County 6 396.1 (378.6, 414.2) 68 (57, 70) 410 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.2, 2.1)
Chippewa County 6 459.6 (438.8, 481.2) 42 (14, 58) 392 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.1, -0.9)
Sauk County 6 443.8 (423.4, 465.0) 50 (26, 63) 383 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Portage County 6 431.7 (411.5, 452.6) 57 (35, 66) 371 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Columbia County 6 451.4 (429.8, 474.0) 47 (17, 61) 351 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Waupaca County 6 461.5 (439.1, 485.0) 39 (10, 59) 351 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Marinette County 6 502.8 (477.1, 529.8) 7 (2, 41) 333 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.6)
Barron County 6 481.3 (456.9, 506.7) 24 (4, 52) 330 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 1.9)
Grant County 6 478.9 (454.1, 504.9) 26 (4, 54) 305 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 0.9)
Oneida County 6 489.5 (462.7, 517.7) 16 (3, 49) 304 falling falling trend -1.1 (-5.2, -0.3)
Oconto County 6 496.1 (468.7, 524.8) 11 (2, 45) 277 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.9)
Polk County 6 415.7 (393.0, 439.5) 61 (44, 69) 276 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.8)
Monroe County 6 461.7 (436.8, 487.8) 38 (9, 59) 274 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Douglas County 6 454.9 (429.9, 481.1) 45 (12, 62) 269 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.1, 0.3)
Shawano County 6 432.5 (408.1, 458.2) 55 (28, 67) 261 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Calumet County 6 411.4 (388.3, 435.7) 63 (45, 70) 250 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.3)
Door County 6 471.3 (441.9, 502.5) 29 (4, 59) 246 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Vilas County 6 529.8 (495.3, 566.6) 3 (1, 29) 233 falling falling trend -2.9 (-11.1, -0.5)
Adams County 6 575.1 (536.9, 615.9) 1 (1, 7) 219 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Green County 6 423.9 (397.9, 451.3) 59 (33, 69) 215 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Lincoln County 6 491.6 (460.8, 524.1) 14 (3, 52) 215 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Vernon County 6 470.7 (440.8, 502.4) 32 (5, 60) 204 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Clark County 6 462.6 (433.1, 493.7) 37 (7, 61) 197 falling falling trend -0.9 (-2.3, -0.2)
Juneau County 6 486.1 (454.6, 519.4) 20 (3, 54) 193 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Dunn County 6 364.5 (341.1, 389.2) 70 (64, 72) 193 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.7)
Trempealeau County 6 483.8 (452.4, 516.9) 22 (3, 56) 189 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.3)
Waushara County 6 465.3 (433.7, 499.0) 34 (5, 61) 187 rising rising trend 7.8 (0.1, 13.4)
Langlade County 6 521.4 (483.3, 562.2) 4 (1, 38) 164 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.6, 6.5)
Pierce County 6 341.8 (317.9, 367.1) 72 (68, 72) 163 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 2.0)
Burnett County 6 555.6 (513.2, 601.2) 2 (1, 21) 161 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 2.4)
Green Lake County 6 490.5 (453.2, 530.3) 15 (2, 57) 144 stable stable trend 4.9 (-0.2, 10.7)
Sawyer County 6 501.9 (461.3, 545.5) 8 (1, 53) 141 stable stable trend -0.1 (-8.3, 2.1)
Iowa County 6 413.1 (380.9, 447.5) 62 (33, 70) 134 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.8)
Jackson County 6 464.6 (428.7, 503.0) 36 (4, 63) 133 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
Kewaunee County 6 429.2 (395.0, 465.9) 58 (16, 69) 128 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 1.5)
Price County 6 509.3 (465.4, 556.9) 5 (1, 53) 120 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.1)
Bayfield County 6 421.7 (384.7, 462.1) 60 (19, 70) 119 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.8)
Crawford County 6 476.7 (436.0, 520.4) 28 (2, 62) 118 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Marquette County 6 459.1 (419.0, 502.5) 43 (4, 66) 117 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Taylor County 6 398.3 (364.6, 434.5) 67 (41, 72) 115 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Richland County 6 400.6 (365.8, 438.1) 66 (38, 72) 112 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Lafayette County 6 500.2 (457.0, 546.6) 10 (1, 56) 111 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.4)
Ashland County 6 471.1 (429.7, 515.8) 31 (3, 64) 105 stable stable trend -1.5 (-9.2, 1.1)
Washburn County 6 378.7 (343.1, 417.5) 69 (53, 72) 103 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.5)
Rusk County 6 437.0 (396.0, 481.7) 54 (7, 70) 100 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
Buffalo County 6 409.3 (369.2, 453.2) 64 (24, 72) 85 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.8)
Forest County 6 477.6 (425.0, 535.7) 27 (1, 67) 70 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.8)
Iron County 6 501.8 (438.3, 574.7) 9 (1, 65) 57 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.4)
Pepin County 6 349.7 (300.5, 405.7) 71 (54, 72) 40 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.8, 1.0)
Florence County 6 465.0 (387.8, 555.7) 35 (1, 71) 35 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.5)
Menominee County 6 432.4 (352.2, 525.9) 56 (2, 72) 22 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -0.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 4:57 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top