Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin 6 N/A 106.5 (105.0, 108.1) N/A 3,615 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 104.6 (104.4, 104.8) N/A 205,200 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
Milwaukee County 6 Urban 107.2 (103.4, 111.1) 28 (16, 44) 612 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.2, 0.8)
Dane County 6 Urban 109.3 (104.3, 114.4) 26 (12, 42) 376 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.2, 1.5)
Waukesha County 6 Urban 115.2 (109.1, 121.5) 13 (6, 36) 270 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.2, 1.3)
Brown County 6 Urban 111.2 (103.9, 118.7) 20 (7, 44) 177 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Racine County 6 Urban 114.5 (105.8, 123.7) 15 (4, 43) 130 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.5, 2.1)
Outagamie County 6 Urban 105.4 (97.1, 114.1) 34 (11, 54) 121 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.8)
Rock County 6 Urban 116.1 (106.7, 126.2) 12 (4, 43) 112 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.0)
Kenosha County 6 Urban 106.3 (97.5, 115.6) 31 (9, 53) 109 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.5)
Winnebago County 6 Urban 106.8 (97.9, 116.4) 32 (9, 54) 106 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 2.0)
Washington County 6 Urban 113.1 (102.8, 124.1) 17 (4, 48) 90 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.6)
Marathon County 6 Urban 107.6 (97.6, 118.3) 27 (7, 55) 85 falling falling trend -5.8 (-10.4, -1.4)
Fond du Lac County 6 Urban 114.6 (102.7, 127.5) 14 (4, 50) 68 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.2)
Sheboygan County 6 Urban 99.7 (89.3, 111.1) 43 (13, 63) 67 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Walworth County 6 Rural 112.5 (100.4, 125.6) 18 (4, 53) 64 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.0)
La Crosse County 6 Urban 96.0 (85.5, 107.3) 51 (18, 65) 63 falling falling trend -8.9 (-16.1, -0.2)
Ozaukee County 6 Urban 125.1 (111.6, 139.9) 6 (2, 37) 62 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.6)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 109.4 (96.9, 123.2) 24 (4, 56) 55 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.8, 4.6)
Eau Claire County 6 Urban 92.5 (81.7, 104.4) 58 (20, 66) 54 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.2, 1.0)
St. Croix County 6 Urban 87.2 (76.7, 98.6) 63 (35, 67) 51 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.4, 3.4)
Manitowoc County 6 Rural 110.4 (96.9, 125.3) 21 (3, 57) 48 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.6)
Dodge County 6 Rural 87.4 (76.5, 99.5) 61 (32, 68) 47 falling falling trend -3.1 (-9.2, -1.0)
Wood County 6 Rural 101.3 (87.8, 116.3) 40 (7, 64) 40 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.0)
Portage County 6 Rural 105.1 (90.8, 120.8) 33 (5, 63) 40 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Sauk County 6 Rural 96.3 (82.8, 111.4) 50 (11, 66) 36 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.6)
Chippewa County 6 Urban 91.7 (78.6, 106.3) 59 (18, 67) 35 stable stable trend -3.5 (-10.5, 1.7)
Columbia County 6 Urban 94.4 (80.3, 110.2) 49 (11, 66) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.4, 1.8)
Calumet County 6 Urban 97.7 (82.9, 114.2) 47 (8, 66) 31 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.1)
Grant County 6 Rural 110.8 (93.2, 130.6) 22 (3, 62) 29 stable stable trend -9.7 (-22.2, 2.7)
Monroe County 6 Rural 107.3 (90.2, 126.7) 29 (4, 64) 28 stable stable trend -11.3 (-25.4, 3.1)
Marinette County 6 Rural 125.9 (105.3, 149.3) 5 (1, 54) 26 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.6)
Waupaca County 6 Rural 93.5 (78.2, 110.9) 57 (10, 67) 26 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.8)
Douglas County 6 Urban 102.8 (85.8, 122.1) 39 (4, 66) 26 stable stable trend 1.7 (-18.3, 4.9)
Oconto County 6 Urban 124.0 (103.5, 147.5) 7 (1, 56) 26 falling falling trend -10.2 (-15.7, -4.9)
Shawano County 6 Rural 118.5 (98.7, 140.9) 10 (1, 57) 26 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.5, 3.3)
Barron County 6 Rural 99.7 (82.9, 118.9) 45 (6, 67) 25 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 2.9)
Dunn County 6 Rural 95.8 (79.1, 114.8) 48 (7, 67) 24 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.5, 4.0)
Green County 6 Urban 103.6 (85.1, 124.9) 37 (3, 66) 22 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.0)
Polk County 6 Rural 87.9 (72.0, 106.3) 62 (15, 68) 21 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.3, 3.5)
Clark County 6 Rural 113.4 (92.5, 137.4) 16 (2, 64) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.1, 1.4)
Pierce County 6 Urban 83.5 (67.5, 102.0) 64 (17, 68) 19 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.2, 5.9)
Oneida County 6 Rural 105.2 (84.9, 128.8) 36 (3, 67) 19 falling falling trend -16.3 (-26.5, -2.2)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 122.3 (98.4, 150.4) 8 (1, 62) 18 rising rising trend 13.6 (3.1, 30.1)
Trempealeau County 6 Rural 99.5 (79.3, 123.1) 42 (4, 67) 17 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.2)
Door County 6 Rural 112.4 (88.7, 140.4) 19 (1, 66) 16 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.2, 3.6)
Waushara County 6 Rural 120.4 (94.8, 150.9) 9 (1, 63) 15 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.1, 3.6)
Juneau County 6 Rural 100.1 (78.6, 125.6) 41 (3, 67) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.2)
Lafayette County 6 Rural 162.5 (126.5, 205.3) 1 (1, 38) 14 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.8, 7.9)
Vernon County 6 Urban 88.5 (68.9, 111.9) 60 (10, 68) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.8, 3.2)
Langlade County 6 Rural 131.8 (101.0, 169.0) 4 (1, 63) 12 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.5, 3.9)
Iowa County 6 Urban 92.1 (70.4, 118.4) 56 (4, 68) 12 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.0, 6.1)
Kewaunee County 6 Urban 107.1 (81.7, 137.9) 30 (2, 68) 12 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.4, 3.7)
Crawford County 6 Rural 139.0 (105.5, 179.7) 3 (1, 59) 12 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.4, 4.6)
Jackson County 6 Rural 95.9 (72.5, 124.3) 52 (4, 68) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.5)
Marquette County 6 Rural 142.6 (106.9, 186.3) 2 (1, 55) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.6, 3.7)
Adams County 6 Rural 110.2 (82.4, 144.6) 25 (1, 68) 11 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.1, 6.0)
Vilas County 6 Rural 96.2 (70.8, 127.9) 46 (2, 68) 10 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.9, 4.0)
Washburn County 6 Rural 119.0 (86.9, 158.9) 11 (1, 67) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.0, 2.3)
Green Lake County 6 Rural 94.7 (69.0, 126.7) 53 (3, 68) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.8, 2.3)
Sawyer County 6 Rural 99.8 (71.7, 135.1) 44 (2, 68) 8 stable stable trend -3.5 (-42.0, 2.2)
Taylor County 6 Rural 79.2 (56.8, 107.3) 66 (10, 68) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.7, 3.6)
Ashland County 6 Rural 94.5 (67.3, 128.6) 55 (3, 68) 8 stable stable trend -4.1 (-18.2, 0.3)
Bayfield County 6 Rural 103.3 (73.0, 142.0) 38 (1, 68) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-4.4, 7.0)
Richland County 6 Rural 80.2 (56.3, 110.7) 65 (9, 68) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.5, 1.8)
Rusk County 6 Rural 105.4 (74.0, 145.5) 35 (1, 68) 7 stable stable trend -26.6 (-56.3, 3.0)
Price County 6 Rural 94.6 (64.8, 133.8) 54 (2, 68) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.7, 5.6)
Buffalo County 6 Rural 70.8 (45.7, 104.6) 67 (11, 68) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.2, 2.3)
Forest County 6 Rural 110.4 (71.2, 163.3) 23 (1, 68) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.1, 3.0)
Burnett County 6 Rural 67.5 (43.1, 100.5) 68 (20, 68) 5 stable stable trend -28.3 (-64.7, 11.0)
Florence County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pepin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/05/2024 1:02 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Florence, Iron, Menominee, Pepin

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top