Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Oral Cavity & Pharynx (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin 6 N/A 12.8 (12.4, 13.2) N/A 986 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.6, 1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 12.0 (11.9, 12.0) N/A 47,920 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.4)
Milwaukee County 6 Urban 12.5 (11.5, 13.5) 33 (20, 50) 132 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.0)
Waukesha County 6 Urban 13.4 (12.1, 14.9) 26 (11, 48) 77 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.3, 4.7)
Dane County 6 Urban 11.8 (10.5, 13.1) 46 (22, 56) 72 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.2)
Brown County 6 Urban 14.8 (12.8, 16.9) 14 (5, 43) 45 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.0, 4.9)
Racine County 6 Urban 14.1 (12.0, 16.4) 21 (6, 49) 36 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.1, 4.4)
Rock County 6 Urban 13.9 (11.7, 16.3) 22 (6, 51) 30 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 3.8)
Winnebago County 6 Urban 14.1 (11.9, 16.6) 20 (5, 51) 30 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.1, 3.4)
Outagamie County 6 Urban 12.2 (10.3, 14.5) 36 (11, 58) 28 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.5)
Kenosha County 6 Urban 12.4 (10.3, 14.8) 34 (11, 58) 26 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.7)
Washington County 6 Urban 13.3 (11.0, 16.0) 29 (6, 56) 25 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.4, 4.6)
La Crosse County 6 Urban 15.9 (13.1, 19.1) 10 (2, 45) 24 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.7)
Fond du Lac County 6 Urban 14.6 (11.8, 18.0) 15 (4, 52) 21 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.5, 4.8)
Marathon County 6 Urban 10.9 (8.8, 13.4) 55 (18, 62) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.6)
Walworth County 6 Rural 13.5 (10.9, 16.7) 25 (5, 57) 20 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.1, 4.4)
Sheboygan County 6 Urban 11.8 (9.5, 14.5) 45 (10, 60) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.4)
Dodge County 6 Rural 12.4 (9.7, 15.6) 35 (8, 61) 16 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.8, 6.4)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 13.3 (10.4, 16.8) 28 (4, 59) 15 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.5, 4.3)
Manitowoc County 6 Rural 11.9 (9.1, 15.2) 42 (8, 61) 14 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.0, 4.2)
Sauk County 6 Rural 15.8 (12.2, 20.1) 11 (1, 53) 14 rising rising trend 5.0 (2.3, 8.5)
Eau Claire County 6 Urban 11.1 (8.6, 14.3) 53 (11, 62) 13
*
*
Wood County 6 Rural 11.4 (8.7, 14.8) 50 (10, 62) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.8, 2.9)
Ozaukee County 6 Urban 9.7 (7.4, 12.7) 60 (21, 63) 13 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.6, 5.3)
Columbia County 6 Urban 13.8 (10.4, 18.2) 23 (3, 59) 12 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.8, 3.6)
Waupaca County 6 Rural 14.6 (11.0, 19.1) 16 (2, 57) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.4, 3.3)
Chippewa County 6 Urban 12.8 (9.5, 16.9) 31 (4, 62) 11 stable stable trend -5.2 (-26.1, 0.7)
St. Croix County 6 Urban 10.0 (7.5, 13.2) 59 (18, 63) 11
*
*
Marinette County 6 Rural 13.4 (10.0, 18.0) 27 (3, 61) 11 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.5, 5.0)
Portage County 6 Rural 11.8 (8.6, 15.8) 44 (6, 63) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.5, 3.8)
Monroe County 6 Rural 16.2 (11.8, 21.9) 8 (1, 58) 9 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.8, 6.5)
Oneida County 6 Rural 12.0 (8.3, 17.2) 38 (4, 63) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.6, 1.6)
Grant County 6 Rural 12.0 (8.4, 16.6) 40 (5, 63) 8 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.5, 7.2)
Door County 6 Rural 12.2 (8.5, 17.8) 37 (4, 63) 8
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural 15.4 (10.7, 22.0) 13 (1, 60) 8 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.9, 1.6)
Barron County 6 Rural 11.1 (7.6, 15.7) 54 (6, 63) 7 stable stable trend 18.1 (-3.9, 44.5)
Douglas County 6 Urban 11.3 (7.8, 16.1) 51 (6, 63) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.8, 5.9)
Oconto County 6 Urban 11.9 (8.2, 17.1) 41 (4, 63) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-5.6, 7.6)
Green County 6 Urban 12.0 (8.2, 17.2) 39 (4, 63) 7 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.4, 8.6)
Adams County 6 Rural 16.1 (10.7, 24.3) 9 (1, 61) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.5, 2.0)
Shawano County 6 Rural 11.2 (7.5, 16.2) 52 (6, 63) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.4, 6.6)
Waushara County 6 Rural 15.5 (10.3, 22.9) 12 (1, 62) 6 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.2, 9.1)
Vernon County 6 Urban 14.1 (9.4, 20.6) 19 (1, 62) 6
*
*
Dunn County 6 Rural 11.5 (7.6, 16.9) 48 (4, 63) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.3, 5.9)
Washburn County 6 Rural 19.1 (12.5, 29.1) 4 (1, 57) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-4.4, 7.5)
Polk County 6 Rural 7.4 (4.8, 11.3) 63 (36, 63) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.2, 4.6)
Langlade County 6 Rural 19.0 (11.8, 29.4) 5 (1, 60) 5
*
*
Pierce County 6 Urban 10.7 (7.0, 16.0) 56 (6, 63) 5
*
*
Calumet County 6 Urban 7.7 (4.9, 11.5) 62 (32, 63) 5
*
*
Clark County 6 Rural 11.7 (7.5, 17.4) 47 (3, 63) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-4.3, 8.2)
Sawyer County 6 Rural 20.0 (11.9, 31.8) 2 (1, 60) 5 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.9, 7.3)
Trempealeau County 6 Rural 11.4 (7.3, 17.3) 49 (4, 63) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-5.2, 6.3)
Crawford County 6 Rural 17.4 (10.8, 27.3) 6 (1, 61) 5
*
*
Lafayette County 6 Rural 20.6 (12.8, 31.7) 1 (1, 57) 5
*
*
Marquette County 6 Rural 20.0 (11.9, 31.9) 3 (1, 60) 5
*
*
Juneau County 6 Rural 10.5 (6.5, 16.5) 57 (5, 63) 4 falling falling trend -3.0 (-6.0, -0.1)
Ashland County 6 Rural 17.0 (10.2, 27.3) 7 (1, 62) 4
*
*
Burnett County 6 Rural 12.6 (7.1, 21.8) 32 (1, 63) 4
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural 14.5 (8.7, 22.9) 17 (1, 63) 4
*
*
Kewaunee County 6 Urban 13.1 (7.9, 20.9) 30 (1, 63) 4
*
*
Vilas County 6 Rural 8.1 (4.4, 14.5) 61 (13, 63) 4 falling falling trend -26.6 (-51.6, -5.2)
Iowa County 6 Urban 11.8 (6.9, 19.3) 43 (2, 63) 4
*
*
Buffalo County 6 Rural 14.2 (8.3, 24.2) 18 (1, 63) 3
*
*
Richland County 6 Rural 13.6 (7.2, 23.6) 24 (1, 63) 3
*
*
Taylor County 6 Rural 10.2 (5.8, 17.3) 58 (4, 63) 3
*
*
Bayfield County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Florence County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Green Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pepin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Price County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rusk County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2024 1:15 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Bayfield, Florence, Forest, Green Lake, Iron, Menominee, Pepin, Price, Rusk

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top