Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Wisconsin 6 N/A 34.6 (34.0, 35.2) N/A 2,511 stable stable trend -1.1 (-1.8, 0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 36.4 (36.3, 36.4) N/A 140,088 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Outagamie County 6 Urban 33.8 (30.4, 37.5) 41 (13, 63) 75 stable stable trend 9.0 (-1.0, 15.1)
Vernon County 6 Urban 42.3 (33.6, 52.8) 8 (1, 60) 18 rising rising trend 5.8 (0.2, 23.3)
Dodge County 6 Rural 34.8 (30.0, 40.2) 34 (7, 66) 40 stable stable trend 5.3 (-3.2, 14.0)
Langlade County 6 Rural 47.0 (36.0, 60.7) 1 (1, 56) 14 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.1)
Calumet County 6 Urban 30.6 (24.5, 37.8) 57 (10, 70) 18 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.3, 12.5)
Grant County 6 Rural 42.0 (34.8, 50.4) 10 (1, 54) 27 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 1.9)
Ashland County 6 Rural 42.4 (30.8, 57.4) 7 (1, 68) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.5, 3.4)
St. Croix County 6 Urban 36.7 (31.5, 42.4) 21 (4, 62) 39 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.3)
Washburn County 6 Rural 39.8 (29.0, 54.0) 13 (1, 69) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.4, 4.6)
Barron County 6 Rural 39.7 (33.0, 47.5) 14 (1, 60) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Brown County 6 Urban 32.3 (29.5, 35.4) 46 (22, 65) 96 stable stable trend -0.9 (-7.9, 5.7)
Buffalo County 6 Rural 30.9 (20.3, 45.8) 55 (1, 70) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.8, 2.3)
Eau Claire County 6 Urban 31.7 (27.2, 36.7) 54 (15, 68) 38 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.4)
Jackson County 6 Rural 44.2 (33.8, 57.2) 5 (1, 63) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.5, 2.2)
Dunn County 6 Rural 32.1 (25.4, 40.1) 49 (6, 70) 17 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.5)
Pierce County 6 Urban 29.9 (23.1, 38.3) 63 (8, 70) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-13.2, 2.5)
Portage County 6 Rural 37.4 (31.6, 44.1) 20 (3, 63) 31 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
Columbia County 6 Urban 36.5 (30.5, 43.4) 22 (3, 65) 28 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 3.3)
Crawford County 6 Rural 34.7 (24.1, 48.9) 35 (1, 70) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.9, 2.5)
Oneida County 6 Rural 42.8 (35.2, 51.8) 6 (1, 53) 27 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.7)
Vilas County 6 Rural 40.7 (31.7, 52.3) 11 (1, 65) 18 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.3, 1.2)
Burnett County 6 Rural 35.6 (25.7, 49.0) 27 (1, 70) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.6, 3.6)
Juneau County 6 Rural 37.5 (29.0, 48.0) 19 (1, 68) 14 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.9, 0.6)
Milwaukee County 6 Urban 39.2 (37.4, 41.0) 15 (7, 29) 389 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Manitowoc County 6 Rural 34.5 (29.5, 40.2) 36 (7, 66) 39 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.4)
Walworth County 6 Rural 38.2 (33.4, 43.5) 16 (3, 54) 50 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.2)
Chippewa County 6 Urban 37.5 (31.8, 44.0) 17 (3, 63) 33 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.8, -0.1)
Marathon County 6 Urban 34.2 (30.3, 38.5) 38 (11, 64) 60 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -1.0)
Rusk County 6 Rural 34.4 (23.9, 48.7) 37 (1, 70) 8 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 0.3)
Lafayette County 6 Rural 46.4 (33.5, 62.7) 2 (1, 67) 10 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.4, 0.8)
Polk County 6 Rural 31.8 (25.6, 39.1) 53 (8, 70) 20 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.4, 0.3)
Rock County 6 Urban 35.4 (31.7, 39.4) 29 (9, 61) 71 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.7)
Washington County 6 Urban 33.5 (29.7, 37.7) 43 (14, 65) 61 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.9)
Waushara County 6 Rural 39.9 (30.7, 51.2) 12 (1, 67) 15 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.5, 1.1)
Adams County 6 Rural 34.9 (26.1, 46.4) 33 (2, 70) 13 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.6)
Marinette County 6 Rural 36.4 (29.7, 44.3) 23 (2, 67) 24 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.7, 0.2)
Price County 6 Rural 27.3 (18.6, 39.9) 68 (8, 70) 7 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.3, 0.7)
Kenosha County 6 Urban 36.1 (32.3, 40.3) 25 (8, 57) 70 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.1)
Ozaukee County 6 Urban 33.1 (28.6, 38.1) 45 (12, 67) 43 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -0.9)
Waupaca County 6 Rural 35.6 (29.4, 42.7) 28 (3, 67) 27 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.6)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 45.4 (36.5, 56.1) 3 (1, 52) 20 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.6, -0.5)
Oconto County 6 Urban 33.8 (27.2, 41.7) 40 (5, 69) 20 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.0, 0.0)
Racine County 6 Urban 34.1 (30.8, 37.6) 39 (14, 62) 85 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.7)
Dane County 6 Urban 29.9 (27.9, 32.1) 64 (40, 67) 170 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.3, -1.8)
Taylor County 6 Rural 29.0 (20.3, 40.4) 67 (5, 70) 8 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.2, 0.1)
Shawano County 6 Rural 33.7 (27.2, 41.5) 42 (5, 69) 20 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.0, -0.4)
Fond du Lac County 6 Urban 33.4 (29.0, 38.3) 44 (11, 66) 44 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.4)
Wood County 6 Rural 32.3 (27.5, 37.8) 47 (11, 68) 35 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -0.9)
Iowa County 6 Urban 31.9 (23.4, 42.7) 52 (2, 70) 10 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.0, 0.3)
Waukesha County 6 Urban 30.6 (28.5, 32.9) 59 (36, 67) 165 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.9, -1.8)
Green Lake County 6 Rural 32.3 (23.1, 44.3) 48 (2, 70) 9 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.5, -0.6)
Monroe County 6 Rural 30.3 (24.1, 37.6) 62 (11, 70) 18 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.0, 0.1)
Sauk County 6 Rural 37.5 (31.9, 43.9) 18 (3, 63) 33 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.7, -1.2)
La Crosse County 6 Urban 30.6 (26.4, 35.3) 58 (21, 69) 42 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.5)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 35.8 (30.7, 41.5) 26 (5, 64) 38 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.6, -0.8)
Forest County 6 Rural 44.2 (31.0, 62.9) 4 (1, 69) 7 stable stable trend -3.4 (-7.8, 0.7)
Douglas County 6 Urban 29.8 (23.5, 37.3) 65 (11, 70) 17 stable stable trend -3.5 (-24.7, 0.2)
Kewaunee County 6 Urban 30.4 (22.2, 41.1) 61 (5, 70) 10 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.8, -0.5)
Richland County 6 Rural 35.2 (25.4, 48.1) 30 (1, 70) 10 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.9, -0.6)
Winnebago County 6 Urban 31.9 (28.4, 35.8) 51 (21, 66) 64 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.9, -2.4)
Bayfield County 6 Rural 34.9 (24.8, 48.6) 31 (1, 70) 10 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.2, -1.0)
Green County 6 Urban 32.1 (25.3, 40.4) 50 (6, 70) 16 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.4, -1.1)
Marquette County 6 Rural 29.1 (20.0, 41.6) 66 (4, 70) 8 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.7, -1.0)
Sheboygan County 6 Urban 34.9 (30.6, 39.6) 32 (9, 64) 52 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.4, -2.7)
Door County 6 Rural 24.2 (18.6, 31.5) 70 (35, 70) 15 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.9, -2.8)
Trempealeau County 6 Rural 25.1 (18.6, 33.4) 69 (24, 70) 10 falling falling trend -11.9 (-48.3, -6.2)
Clark County 6 Rural 42.3 (33.7, 52.6) 9 (1, 62) 18 stable stable trend -16.1 (-33.5, 0.1)
Sawyer County 6 Rural 36.2 (25.4, 50.5) 24 (1, 70) 9 falling falling trend -27.8 (-46.4, -2.3)
Iron County 6 Rural 30.6 (16.3, 55.7) 60 (1, 70) 4
*
*
Pepin County 6 Rural 30.9 (16.7, 53.2) 56 (1, 70) 3
*
*
Florence County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2024 9:44 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Florence, Menominee

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top