Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 39.9?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin 6 Yes 36.5 (35.8, 37.1) N/A 2,563 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 Yes 38.0 (37.9, 38.1) N/A 143,200 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
Burnett County 6 No 54.8 (41.5, 71.7) 1 (1, 41) 14 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.2, 4.4)
Langlade County 6 No 50.3 (39.0, 64.3) 2 (1, 52) 15 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.3, 3.4)
Ashland County 6 No 50.1 (37.5, 66.0) 3 (1, 57) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.6, 4.0)
Sawyer County 6 No 48.7 (36.2, 64.7) 4 (1, 61) 12 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.1, 3.2)
Oneida County 6 No 48.7 (40.5, 58.3) 5 (1, 38) 29 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.6)
Vilas County 6 No 48.1 (37.2, 61.6) 6 (1, 56) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.6)
Clark County 6 No 46.0 (36.8, 56.9) 7 (1, 56) 18 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.9, 3.7)
Grant County 6 No 44.6 (37.3, 53.0) 8 (1, 50) 29 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.4)
Monroe County 6 No 44.0 (36.4, 52.9) 9 (1, 54) 24 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.7, 0.5)
Kewaunee County 6 No 42.6 (32.1, 55.8) 10 (1, 66) 12 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.6, 0.4)
Sauk County 6 No 41.5 (35.4, 48.5) 11 (2, 55) 34 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.4, -0.7)
Milwaukee County 6 No 41.3 (39.5, 43.2) 12 (7, 27) 411 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.4)
Forest County 6 No 41.1 (27.9, 59.9) 13 (1, 68) 6 stable stable trend -3.8 (-7.6, 0.2)
Columbia County 6 No 40.2 (33.8, 47.5) 14 (3, 61) 30 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.8, -0.7)
Chippewa County 6 No 40.1 (34.0, 46.9) 15 (3, 58) 33 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.0)
Dunn County 6 No 39.9 (32.3, 48.8) 16 (2, 63) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.2)
Barron County 6 Yes 39.3 (32.4, 47.4) 17 (2, 64) 26 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Lincoln County 6 Yes 39.2 (31.2, 49.0) 18 (2, 65) 17 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.1, -0.6)
Kenosha County 6 Yes 39.1 (35.1, 43.4) 19 (6, 52) 73 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.4)
Waupaca County 6 Yes 38.5 (32.1, 45.9) 20 (4, 63) 29 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.1)
Waushara County 6 Yes 38.4 (29.5, 49.5) 21 (1, 67) 14 rising rising trend 15.2 (5.0, 26.4)
Washburn County 6 Yes 38.4 (27.8, 52.5) 22 (1, 68) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.9, 2.6)
Jackson County 6 Yes 38.4 (28.4, 51.0) 23 (1, 67) 11 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.6, 1.4)
Polk County 6 Yes 37.9 (31.1, 45.9) 24 (3, 65) 23 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.0, 0.6)
Douglas County 6 Yes 37.8 (30.8, 46.1) 25 (4, 65) 21 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.3, 5.0)
Walworth County 6 Yes 37.8 (33.0, 43.2) 26 (5, 60) 46 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.9)
Vernon County 6 Yes 37.7 (29.2, 48.0) 27 (2, 67) 15 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.8, 1.2)
Rock County 6 Yes 37.6 (33.8, 41.7) 28 (8, 57) 74 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.3, -1.5)
Washington County 6 Yes 37.3 (33.2, 41.8) 29 (9, 59) 64 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.3)
Oconto County 6 Yes 37.2 (30.1, 45.9) 30 (4, 66) 20 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.3, 0.2)
Taylor County 6 Yes 37.1 (27.2, 49.8) 31 (1, 68) 10 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.4, 0.9)
Fond du Lac County 6 Yes 37.0 (32.3, 42.2) 32 (7, 61) 49 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.7, -1.5)
Manitowoc County 6 Yes 36.8 (31.7, 42.5) 33 (7, 63) 41 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.6)
Marinette County 6 Yes 36.6 (30.1, 44.3) 34 (5, 66) 24 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.1, 0.3)
Portage County 6 Yes 36.4 (30.5, 43.1) 35 (6, 65) 29 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.2, 0.1)
Shawano County 6 Yes 36.2 (29.6, 44.2) 36 (5, 66) 22 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.4, -1.0)
St. Croix County 6 Yes 36.2 (30.9, 42.2) 37 (7, 64) 35 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Sheboygan County 6 Yes 36.0 (31.7, 40.7) 38 (10, 62) 53 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.8, -3.0)
Jefferson County 6 Yes 35.8 (30.7, 41.5) 39 (9, 64) 38 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.7, -1.8)
Racine County 6 Yes 35.7 (32.4, 39.4) 40 (14, 60) 87 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.9)
Price County 6 Yes 35.5 (25.7, 49.1) 41 (2, 68) 9 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.0, 1.3)
La Crosse County 6 Yes 34.8 (30.2, 39.9) 42 (10, 65) 45 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.8, -1.8)
Marathon County 6 Yes 34.5 (30.6, 38.8) 43 (15, 64) 59 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.1)
Outagamie County 6 Yes 34.4 (30.8, 38.2) 44 (16, 63) 71 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.6, -2.3)
Brown County 6 Yes 34.3 (31.3, 37.6) 45 (19, 62) 97 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.5, -2.4)
Waukesha County 6 Yes 34.0 (31.7, 36.4) 46 (26, 61) 178 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.6, -2.2)
Crawford County 6 Yes 34.0 (23.9, 47.3) 47 (3, 68) 8 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.3, 1.9)
Juneau County 6 Yes 33.8 (25.8, 43.8) 48 (5, 68) 13 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.8, -0.8)
Trempealeau County 6 Yes 33.7 (26.0, 43.1) 49 (5, 68) 14 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.9, 0.5)
Wood County 6 Yes 33.5 (28.5, 39.3) 50 (12, 67) 35 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.7, -1.4)
Rusk County 6 Yes 33.5 (23.8, 46.8) 51 (2, 68) 8 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.5, 1.2)
Adams County 6 Yes 33.3 (25.2, 44.2) 52 (6, 68) 13 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.5, -1.9)
Eau Claire County 6 Yes 32.5 (27.8, 37.8) 53 (16, 67) 36 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Richland County 6 Yes 32.2 (23.5, 43.8) 54 (4, 68) 10 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.6, -1.3)
Ozaukee County 6 Yes 32.0 (27.5, 37.1) 55 (20, 67) 39 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.3, -1.1)
Green Lake County 6 Yes 31.9 (22.8, 43.9) 56 (4, 68) 9 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.7, -1.4)
Calumet County 6 Yes 31.8 (25.4, 39.3) 57 (12, 68) 18 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.2, -2.3)
Marquette County 6 Yes 31.8 (22.3, 44.8) 58 (4, 68) 8 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.9, -0.1)
Dodge County 6 Yes 31.7 (27.0, 36.9) 59 (21, 67) 35 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.3, -2.7)
Winnebago County 6 Yes 31.5 (28.0, 35.3) 60 (27, 66) 63 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.6, -3.2)
Lafayette County 6 Yes 31.2 (21.0, 44.8) 61 (4, 68) 6 stable stable trend -3.5 (-6.9, 0.1)
Dane County 6 Yes 31.1 (29.0, 33.4) 62 (41, 65) 166 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.6, -1.9)
Door County 6 Yes 30.2 (23.6, 38.6) 63 (13, 68) 17 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.9, -1.9)
Green County 6 Yes 29.4 (22.8, 37.5) 64 (18, 68) 15 falling falling trend -5.6 (-8.5, -2.6)
Iowa County 6 Yes 28.4 (20.4, 38.7) 65 (10, 68) 9 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.7, -0.2)
Buffalo County 6 Yes 28.1 (18.4, 42.0) 66 (6, 68) 6 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.6, 1.0)
Pierce County 6 Yes 25.0 (18.8, 32.6) 67 (34, 68) 12 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.2, -0.2)
Bayfield County 6 Yes 23.3 (15.4, 35.0) 68 (24, 68) 6 falling falling trend -5.7 (-9.0, -2.2)
Florence County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pepin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/01/2021 1:45 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top