Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Uterus (Corpus & Uterus, NOS) (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin 6 N/A 30.6 (29.8, 31.4) N/A 1,227 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.2, 0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 27.8 (27.7, 27.9) N/A 58,425 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Adams County 6 Rural 30.9 (19.8, 48.6) 27 (1, 64) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.7, 2.8)
Barron County 6 Rural 29.2 (20.7, 40.2) 39 (2, 64) 9 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.4, 7.4)
Bayfield County 6 Rural 32.4 (18.8, 54.0) 19 (1, 64) 4
*
*
Brown County 6 Urban 30.7 (26.9, 34.8) 31 (7, 52) 51 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.5, 2.9)
Burnett County 6 Rural 34.8 (19.8, 58.1) 8 (1, 64) 4
*
*
Calumet County 6 Urban 21.5 (14.9, 30.3) 62 (16, 64) 7 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.9, 0.3)
Chippewa County 6 Urban 23.5 (17.2, 31.6) 58 (14, 64) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.3, 5.5)
Clark County 6 Rural 28.2 (18.7, 41.1) 44 (2, 64) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-4.5, 8.5)
Columbia County 6 Urban 33.6 (25.7, 43.3) 13 (1, 58) 13 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.8, 4.7)
Crawford County 6 Rural 46.2 (29.5, 70.1) 1 (1, 58) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.7, 8.2)
Dane County 6 Urban 30.7 (28.0, 33.6) 30 (11, 47) 101 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.4, 0.6)
Dodge County 6 Rural 28.7 (22.8, 35.8) 42 (6, 61) 18 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.7, 2.4)
Door County 6 Rural 30.0 (20.7, 43.2) 36 (1, 63) 9 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.9, 1.9)
Douglas County 6 Urban 17.8 (12.0, 25.9) 64 (38, 64) 6 stable stable trend -3.8 (-30.1, 5.3)
Dunn County 6 Rural 18.5 (11.8, 27.9) 63 (28, 64) 5 falling falling trend -40.7 (-64.2, -5.0)
Eau Claire County 6 Urban 23.3 (18.2, 29.4) 59 (22, 64) 16 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.2, 4.5)
Fond du Lac County 6 Urban 25.4 (20.4, 31.4) 51 (16, 63) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.5, 2.4)
Grant County 6 Rural 31.4 (23.2, 41.9) 25 (2, 61) 11 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.5, 7.3)
Green County 6 Urban 29.9 (21.5, 41.1) 37 (2, 63) 9 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.6, 6.2)
Green Lake County 6 Rural 30.0 (18.9, 46.9) 35 (1, 64) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-3.1, 7.4)
Iowa County 6 Urban 22.0 (13.0, 35.8) 61 (5, 64) 4 falling falling trend -19.7 (-34.9, -10.0)
Jackson County 6 Rural 36.2 (22.3, 55.9) 5 (1, 64) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.6, 5.2)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 29.2 (23.2, 36.3) 40 (5, 60) 18 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 3.0)
Juneau County 6 Rural 35.7 (24.3, 51.4) 6 (1, 62) 7 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.7, 8.8)
Kenosha County 6 Urban 30.3 (25.6, 35.5) 33 (6, 55) 32 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.1, 1.8)
Kewaunee County 6 Urban 24.2 (14.4, 39.4) 55 (3, 64) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.9, 4.4)
La Crosse County 6 Urban 32.6 (26.8, 39.3) 17 (3, 55) 24 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.5, 4.1)
Lafayette County 6 Rural 31.0 (17.3, 52.0) 26 (1, 64) 3
*
*
Langlade County 6 Rural 27.2 (16.1, 44.4) 46 (1, 64) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.4, 2.2)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 38.7 (27.4, 53.9) 4 (1, 58) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.5, 3.5)
Manitowoc County 6 Rural 31.7 (25.3, 39.3) 24 (3, 57) 20 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.6)
Marathon County 6 Urban 32.0 (27.0, 37.7) 21 (4, 52) 31 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.5)
Marinette County 6 Rural 34.5 (25.3, 46.4) 9 (1, 60) 11 rising rising trend 28.1 (2.4, 44.4)
Marquette County 6 Rural 25.1 (13.3, 45.0) 52 (1, 64) 3
*
*
Milwaukee County 6 Urban 34.9 (32.7, 37.2) 7 (5, 28) 200 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.2, 2.8)
Monroe County 6 Rural 27.7 (19.9, 37.9) 45 (4, 64) 9 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.6, 5.6)
Oconto County 6 Urban 33.1 (24.1, 45.0) 14 (1, 61) 10 stable stable trend 1.7 (-3.8, 8.3)
Oneida County 6 Rural 30.8 (21.7, 43.0) 29 (1, 63) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.9, 3.5)
Outagamie County 6 Urban 28.4 (24.2, 33.2) 43 (10, 58) 34 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.4)
Ozaukee County 6 Urban 29.8 (24.0, 36.7) 38 (5, 60) 21 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.4, 4.5)
Pierce County 6 Urban 27.1 (18.0, 39.4) 47 (2, 64) 6
*
*
Polk County 6 Rural 24.2 (17.1, 33.7) 56 (8, 64) 9 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.6, 6.6)
Portage County 6 Rural 32.5 (25.3, 41.3) 18 (2, 58) 15 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.0, 3.9)
Price County 6 Rural 33.0 (19.0, 55.8) 15 (1, 64) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.0, 2.4)
Racine County 6 Urban 26.9 (23.0, 31.4) 49 (18, 60) 37 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.2, 3.0)
Richland County 6 Rural 43.5 (28.8, 64.4) 2 (1, 58) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.0, 4.3)
Rock County 6 Urban 34.5 (29.5, 40.1) 10 (2, 46) 37 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.5, 2.9)
Rusk County 6 Rural 28.9 (16.1, 50.1) 41 (1, 64) 3 stable stable trend -2.3 (-8.6, 3.9)
Sauk County 6 Rural 26.5 (20.2, 34.4) 50 (7, 63) 13 falling falling trend -9.9 (-19.7, -1.9)
Shawano County 6 Rural 25.0 (17.5, 35.1) 53 (6, 64) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.8, 3.0)
Sheboygan County 6 Urban 31.9 (26.7, 38.1) 23 (3, 54) 28 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.0, 2.8)
St. Croix County 6 Urban 24.2 (18.7, 31.0) 54 (17, 64) 14 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.9, 5.9)
Taylor County 6 Rural 30.9 (19.3, 48.0) 28 (1, 64) 5
*
*
Trempealeau County 6 Rural 23.7 (14.7, 36.4) 57 (4, 64) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-7.7, 5.7)
Vernon County 6 Urban 41.5 (29.6, 57.0) 3 (1, 54) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.3, 5.8)
Vilas County 6 Rural 30.4 (19.9, 46.3) 32 (1, 64) 7 falling falling trend -8.0 (-28.5, -2.5)
Walworth County 6 Rural 30.1 (24.5, 36.7) 34 (5, 58) 22 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.7, 3.9)
Washburn County 6 Rural 22.8 (12.8, 40.1) 60 (2, 64) 4
*
*
Washington County 6 Urban 33.8 (28.8, 39.6) 12 (3, 48) 34 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.7)
Waukesha County 6 Urban 32.2 (29.3, 35.3) 20 (7, 43) 98 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 2.7)
Waupaca County 6 Rural 34.5 (26.8, 44.1) 11 (1, 56) 14 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.7, 4.6)
Waushara County 6 Rural 27.1 (17.7, 41.2) 48 (2, 64) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.1, 2.9)
Winnebago County 6 Urban 32.0 (27.2, 37.4) 22 (4, 51) 35 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.4, 9.7)
Wood County 6 Rural 32.8 (26.0, 40.9) 16 (2, 58) 18 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.4, 3.3)
Ashland County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buffalo County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Florence County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pepin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sawyer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/07/2024 4:36 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Ashland, Buffalo, Florence, Forest, Iron, Menominee, Pepin, Sawyer

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top