Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin 6 118.9 (117.3, 120.5) N/A 4,604 rising rising trend 4.2 (2.4, 6.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 110.5 (110.2, 110.7) N/A 212,734 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.0, 4.1)
Milwaukee County 6 126.1 (121.5, 130.7) 24 (14, 36) 628 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Waukesha County 6 146.2 (139.9, 152.8) 7 (1, 16) 421 rising rising trend 8.0 (5.4, 11.6)
Dane County 6 101.5 (96.2, 107.1) 57 (41, 63) 292 rising rising trend 7.4 (1.6, 11.1)
Brown County 6 126.7 (118.7, 135.0) 23 (9, 41) 202 stable stable trend 4.8 (-1.4, 11.8)
Racine County 6 135.0 (125.9, 144.6) 12 (3, 33) 173 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.9)
Washington County 6 131.9 (121.7, 142.9) 15 (5, 39) 129 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.7)
Marathon County 6 134.1 (123.7, 145.3) 14 (4, 35) 127 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.9, 6.2)
Outagamie County 6 110.6 (101.9, 119.8) 45 (24, 59) 127 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.3, -1.7)
Winnebago County 6 116.1 (107.0, 125.8) 37 (17, 55) 125 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.6, 8.8)
Kenosha County 6 120.3 (110.5, 130.7) 32 (13, 51) 121 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -0.7)
Rock County 6 105.9 (97.1, 115.5) 52 (30, 63) 110 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.1)
Sheboygan County 6 122.6 (111.8, 134.2) 28 (8, 50) 100 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.1, -1.3)
Ozaukee County 6 135.7 (123.3, 149.2) 11 (2, 39) 92 rising rising trend 4.6 (0.7, 11.3)
Fond du Lac County 6 119.7 (108.4, 131.9) 33 (11, 57) 87 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.3, -0.2)
Walworth County 6 114.8 (103.7, 126.9) 38 (15, 59) 83 stable stable trend 6.5 (-2.0, 12.4)
Manitowoc County 6 124.0 (111.8, 137.5) 26 (7, 52) 79 stable stable trend 5.6 (-3.2, 17.3)
La Crosse County 6 106.3 (95.7, 117.7) 51 (28, 65) 78 rising rising trend 8.5 (2.2, 14.8)
Wood County 6 129.8 (116.6, 144.4) 18 (4, 45) 73 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 0.4)
Eau Claire County 6 112.2 (100.3, 125.2) 42 (15, 61) 68 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.3)
Dodge County 6 102.8 (91.7, 115.1) 56 (28, 66) 65 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.6, -1.6)
Jefferson County 6 96.6 (85.4, 109.0) 59 (35, 68) 57 falling falling trend -5.0 (-7.5, -2.5)
Chippewa County 6 121.3 (107.1, 137.1) 31 (7, 57) 56 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.1, 10.3)
Barron County 6 134.6 (118.0, 153.2) 13 (2, 46) 50 rising rising trend 10.6 (1.5, 25.3)
Portage County 6 105.1 (91.9, 119.8) 54 (21, 66) 48 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.6, 11.8)
Marinette County 6 128.6 (112.1, 147.3) 20 (3, 54) 48 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.4, -1.0)
Oneida County 6 131.3 (114.4, 150.7) 17 (2, 52) 46 stable stable trend 5.2 (-2.1, 15.5)
Door County 6 152.5 (132.1, 176.4) 3 (1, 30) 44 rising rising trend 19.4 (4.7, 29.7)
St. Croix County 6 75.0 (64.6, 86.7) 70 (61, 71) 41 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.4, -0.9)
Polk County 6 108.8 (93.8, 126.0) 48 (13, 66) 40 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.5)
Waupaca County 6 94.4 (81.4, 109.1) 61 (35, 70) 40 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.7, -3.0)
Sauk County 6 85.3 (73.4, 98.8) 67 (48, 71) 39 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.3, -3.2)
Columbia County 6 89.7 (77.0, 104.2) 64 (41, 70) 38 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.5, -2.7)
Oconto County 6 113.0 (96.9, 131.5) 40 (9, 66) 38 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.1, -0.9)
Grant County 6 112.5 (96.6, 130.4) 41 (10, 64) 37 stable stable trend 9.0 (-2.1, 17.9)
Vilas County 6 149.7 (127.6, 176.1) 5 (1, 38) 37 stable stable trend 3.5 (-5.6, 14.4)
Shawano County 6 105.8 (90.5, 123.5) 53 (17, 67) 35 rising rising trend 7.9 (1.9, 18.8)
Clark County 6 149.8 (127.9, 174.6) 4 (1, 39) 35 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.4, 2.7)
Calumet County 6 104.5 (89.0, 122.1) 55 (19, 68) 35 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.9, -2.7)
Douglas County 6 107.7 (91.6, 126.2) 49 (12, 67) 34 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.5)
Monroe County 6 96.2 (81.6, 113.0) 60 (31, 70) 32 stable stable trend 7.5 (-7.1, 20.4)
Lincoln County 6 136.5 (115.7, 160.7) 10 (1, 54) 32 rising rising trend 9.4 (1.1, 19.3)
Adams County 6 124.7 (105.0, 148.9) 25 (3, 61) 30 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Trempealeau County 6 139.5 (117.5, 164.8) 9 (1, 51) 30 rising rising trend 18.5 (8.0, 34.1)
Dunn County 6 106.6 (89.5, 126.3) 50 (13, 67) 29 rising rising trend 8.0 (0.4, 21.1)
Vernon County 6 112.1 (94.0, 133.2) 44 (7, 67) 29 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.9, -1.9)
Juneau County 6 117.8 (97.9, 141.2) 35 (3, 65) 26 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.6, 0.1)
Langlade County 6 149.3 (124.2, 179.2) 6 (1, 44) 26 rising rising trend 23.7 (11.1, 34.5)
Waushara County 6 110.4 (91.5, 133.1) 46 (8, 68) 26 rising rising trend 9.5 (3.1, 16.9)
Green County 6 88.0 (72.5, 106.2) 65 (37, 71) 24 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.1, -0.3)
Bayfield County 6 131.6 (107.6, 161.8) 16 (1, 61) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.9, 4.8)
Price County 6 153.3 (125.1, 188.5) 2 (1, 48) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.7)
Burnett County 6 123.8 (100.6, 153.2) 27 (1, 65) 21 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -1.1)
Green Lake County 6 128.2 (104.1, 157.3) 21 (1, 65) 21 stable stable trend 18.0 (-0.5, 33.3)
Jackson County 6 127.1 (103.2, 155.7) 22 (1, 64) 20 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.1, 1.3)
Sawyer County 6 116.3 (93.8, 144.6) 36 (4, 67) 20 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.5, 0.6)
Taylor County 6 121.7 (98.3, 149.8) 30 (2, 66) 20 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.6)
Kewaunee County 6 98.0 (77.9, 122.7) 58 (15, 71) 17 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.6, -1.9)
Iowa County 6 85.5 (67.2, 108.0) 66 (35, 71) 16 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.3, -1.2)
Lafayette County 6 122.3 (96.2, 154.2) 29 (1, 67) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.3, 3.9)
Pierce County 6 60.2 (47.2, 76.0) 71 (66, 71) 16 falling falling trend -4.9 (-9.6, -0.1)
Ashland County 6 140.3 (109.8, 177.5) 8 (1, 64) 15 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.9, 4.5)
Rusk County 6 114.6 (88.8, 147.2) 39 (2, 69) 15 rising rising trend 16.1 (0.1, 42.3)
Richland County 6 91.0 (70.7, 116.7) 63 (20, 71) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.4)
Marquette County 6 91.8 (70.8, 119.1) 62 (19, 71) 14 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.7, 0.6)
Washburn County 6 83.4 (63.8, 109.5) 68 (31, 71) 13 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.5, 0.4)
Buffalo County 6 112.1 (85.8, 145.7) 43 (3, 70) 13 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.5, 0.4)
Crawford County 6 75.8 (56.8, 100.7) 69 (40, 71) 11 falling falling trend -7.4 (-22.2, -5.6)
Iron County 6 169.2 (125.9, 231.4) 1 (1, 54) 11 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.4, 3.2)
Forest County 6 119.0 (88.0, 160.6) 34 (1, 70) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.8, 4.6)
Pepin County 6 129.8 (91.6, 181.9) 19 (1, 70) 8 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.8, 1.0)
Florence County 6 109.2 (70.4, 174.0) 47 (1, 71) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-6.5, 5.3)
Menominee County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/17/2024 2:15 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top