Incidence Rates Table
County![]() |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) ![]() |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) ![]() |
Average Annual Count![]() |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) ![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wisconsin 6 | 118.3 (116.7, 119.9) | N/A | 4,478 |
rising ![]() |
3.7 (1.3, 6.2) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 109.9 (109.7, 110.2) | N/A | 211,245 |
stable ![]() |
1.9 (-0.8, 4.6) |
Crawford County 6 | 79.0 (59.5, 104.2) | 69 (36, 71) | 11 |
falling ![]() |
-7.3 (-9.4, -5.2) |
St. Croix County 6 | 64.2 (54.3, 75.4) | 70 (66, 71) | 33 |
falling ![]() |
-5.2 (-6.8, -3.6) |
Monroe County 6 | 91.1 (76.6, 107.8) | 63 (33, 70) | 29 |
falling ![]() |
-5.0 (-7.0, -3.0) |
Sauk County 6 | 84.7 (72.7, 98.3) | 67 (47, 70) | 37 |
falling ![]() |
-4.8 (-6.3, -3.4) |
Burnett County 6 | 99.5 (78.8, 126.5) | 54 (11, 70) | 17 |
falling ![]() |
-4.6 (-6.9, -2.3) |
Kewaunee County 6 | 91.0 (71.6, 115.1) | 64 (24, 71) | 16 |
falling ![]() |
-4.4 (-6.7, -2.0) |
Pierce County 6 | 63.3 (49.9, 79.4) | 71 (63, 71) | 16 |
falling ![]() |
-4.3 (-7.3, -1.2) |
Grant County 6 | 109.9 (94.2, 127.7) | 45 (11, 66) | 36 |
falling ![]() |
-4.2 (-6.4, -2.0) |
Jefferson County 6 | 94.5 (83.1, 107.1) | 62 (37, 69) | 53 |
falling ![]() |
-4.2 (-6.3, -2.0) |
Columbia County 6 | 90.7 (77.7, 105.6) | 65 (36, 70) | 37 |
falling ![]() |
-4.1 (-5.5, -2.7) |
Vernon County 6 | 120.5 (101.5, 142.7) | 29 (2, 62) | 30 |
falling ![]() |
-4.1 (-6.0, -2.2) |
Iowa County 6 | 81.8 (63.5, 104.4) | 68 (35, 71) | 15 |
falling ![]() |
-3.9 (-6.0, -1.8) |
Oconto County 6 | 112.4 (96.1, 131.1) | 41 (8, 65) | 36 |
falling ![]() |
-3.9 (-5.8, -1.9) |
Sheboygan County 6 | 122.3 (111.4, 134.0) | 26 (8, 51) | 97 |
falling ![]() |
-3.7 (-5.6, -1.8) |
Dodge County 6 | 97.3 (86.3, 109.5) | 58 (33, 68) | 59 |
falling ![]() |
-3.6 (-5.5, -1.8) |
Rock County 6 | 94.6 (86.1, 103.7) | 60 (41, 68) | 97 |
falling ![]() |
-3.5 (-4.6, -2.4) |
Adams County 6 | 99.0 (81.2, 121.4) | 56 (18, 69) | 23 |
falling ![]() |
-3.4 (-4.9, -1.9) |
Green County 6 | 87.2 (71.7, 105.4) | 66 (37, 71) | 23 |
falling ![]() |
-3.4 (-5.3, -1.4) |
Outagamie County 6 | 119.1 (110.0, 128.8) | 31 (12, 49) | 133 |
falling ![]() |
-3.2 (-4.1, -2.2) |
Buffalo County 6 | 116.8 (89.8, 151.0) | 33 (1, 69) | 13 |
falling ![]() |
-3.0 (-5.7, -0.2) |
Manitowoc County 6 | 118.4 (106.3, 131.7) | 32 (9, 55) | 73 |
falling ![]() |
-2.9 (-4.5, -1.2) |
Marinette County 6 | 120.9 (104.9, 139.1) | 27 (3, 60) | 44 |
falling ![]() |
-2.9 (-4.7, -1.1) |
Pepin County 6 | 134.0 (94.7, 187.4) | 15 (1, 69) | 8 |
stable ![]() |
-2.9 (-5.8, 0.0) |
Sawyer County 6 | 114.0 (91.7, 142.0) | 36 (3, 68) | 19 |
stable ![]() |
-2.9 (-5.8, 0.0) |
Calumet County 6 | 105.3 (89.4, 123.4) | 49 (15, 68) | 33 |
falling ![]() |
-2.7 (-4.1, -1.3) |
Fond du Lac County 6 | 133.8 (121.7, 146.9) | 17 (2, 38) | 95 |
falling ![]() |
-2.6 (-4.2, -0.9) |
Iron County 6 | 141.6 (101.3, 201.3) | 7 (1, 68) | 9 |
stable ![]() |
-2.6 (-6.3, 1.2) |
Juneau County 6 | 113.6 (93.9, 136.9) | 39 (4, 67) | 24 |
falling ![]() |
-2.6 (-4.4, -0.7) |
Kenosha County 6 | 119.6 (109.8, 130.1) | 30 (12, 50) | 118 |
falling ![]() |
-2.6 (-3.7, -1.4) |
Wood County 6 | 126.5 (113.4, 140.9) | 23 (4, 46) | 70 |
falling ![]() |
-2.4 (-4.0, -0.7) |
Rusk County 6 | 109.1 (83.8, 141.4) | 46 (2, 69) | 14 |
stable ![]() |
-2.2 (-5.5, 1.1) |
Walworth County 6 | 111.3 (100.2, 123.4) | 43 (16, 59) | 78 |
falling ![]() |
-2.1 (-3.3, -0.8) |
Washington County 6 | 136.6 (126.1, 147.9) | 11 (2, 32) | 130 |
falling ![]() |
-2.1 (-3.4, -0.9) |
Eau Claire County 6 | 113.9 (101.8, 127.0) | 38 (15, 59) | 68 |
falling ![]() |
-1.9 (-3.4, -0.3) |
Marquette County 6 | 99.0 (77.2, 127.2) | 55 (12, 70) | 15 |
stable ![]() |
-1.9 (-5.1, 1.4) |
Racine County 6 | 134.9 (125.7, 144.6) | 13 (2, 31) | 170 |
falling ![]() |
-1.9 (-2.9, -1.0) |
Milwaukee County 6 | 131.2 (126.6, 136.0) | 18 (8, 29) | 645 |
falling ![]() |
-1.8 (-2.5, -1.2) |
Clark County 6 | 150.6 (128.5, 175.8) | 3 (1, 35) | 34 |
stable ![]() |
-1.7 (-4.2, 0.8) |
Barron County 6 | 128.2 (111.9, 146.6) | 21 (2, 53) | 46 |
stable ![]() |
-1.5 (-4.2, 1.2) |
Vilas County 6 | 139.6 (117.8, 165.7) | 8 (1, 50) | 33 |
stable ![]() |
-1.4 (-3.2, 0.5) |
Jackson County 6 | 115.6 (92.3, 143.6) | 35 (2, 68) | 18 |
stable ![]() |
-1.3 (-3.7, 1.1) |
Dunn County 6 | 105.1 (88.0, 124.8) | 50 (13, 69) | 28 |
stable ![]() |
-1.1 (-3.2, 1.1) |
Forest County 6 | 139.0 (105.0, 183.6) | 9 (1, 67) | 12 |
stable ![]() |
-1.0 (-4.4, 2.6) |
Polk County 6 | 107.5 (92.4, 124.8) | 48 (14, 67) | 38 |
stable ![]() |
-1.0 (-3.1, 1.1) |
Douglas County 6 | 108.5 (92.0, 127.3) | 47 (11, 67) | 33 |
stable ![]() |
-0.8 (-2.5, 0.9) |
Lincoln County 6 | 135.9 (115.1, 160.2) | 12 (1, 49) | 31 |
stable ![]() |
-0.6 (-2.5, 1.5) |
Taylor County 6 | 133.9 (108.9, 163.7) | 16 (1, 60) | 21 |
stable ![]() |
-0.5 (-3.1, 2.2) |
Florence County 6 | 116.0 (74.9, 183.0) | 34 (1, 71) | 5 |
stable ![]() |
-0.2 (-4.4, 4.2) |
Lafayette County 6 | 113.0 (87.5, 144.5) | 40 (2, 69) | 14 |
stable ![]() |
-0.2 (-3.5, 3.1) |
Richland County 6 | 94.9 (73.9, 121.3) | 59 (13, 71) | 15 |
stable ![]() |
-0.1 (-2.1, 2.0) |
Bayfield County 6 | 120.8 (97.9, 150.0) | 28 (2, 67) | 20 |
stable ![]() |
0.1 (-3.3, 3.7) |
Price County 6 | 152.9 (124.5, 188.3) | 1 (1, 44) | 21 |
stable ![]() |
0.1 (-2.1, 2.3) |
Waupaca County 6 | 94.6 (81.5, 109.4) | 61 (33, 69) | 39 |
stable ![]() |
0.2 (-6.8, 7.7) |
Ashland County 6 | 147.3 (116.4, 185.0) | 4 (1, 57) | 16 |
stable ![]() |
0.6 (-2.0, 3.3) |
Winnebago County 6 | 113.9 (104.8, 123.7) | 37 (20, 54) | 120 |
stable ![]() |
0.7 (-1.9, 3.5) |
Washburn County 6 | 110.4 (87.3, 139.8) | 44 (3, 69) | 17 |
stable ![]() |
1.3 (-1.8, 4.6) |
Portage County 6 | 102.0 (88.9, 116.6) | 52 (25, 68) | 46 |
stable ![]() |
1.6 (-1.9, 5.2) |
Marathon County 6 | 134.2 (123.6, 145.4) | 14 (3, 34) | 125 |
stable ![]() |
2.7 (-7.8, 14.3) |
Chippewa County 6 | 123.0 (108.6, 139.0) | 25 (5, 53) | 56 |
rising ![]() |
3.7 (0.6, 6.9) |
Ozaukee County 6 | 137.3 (124.8, 151.0) | 10 (1, 34) | 91 |
stable ![]() |
4.2 (-1.7, 10.5) |
Brown County 6 | 128.2 (120.1, 136.7) | 22 (7, 39) | 197 |
stable ![]() |
4.3 (-0.1, 9.0) |
Dane County 6 | 97.9 (92.6, 103.5) | 57 (43, 65) | 272 |
stable ![]() |
7.1 (-0.9, 15.8) |
Waukesha County 6 | 141.7 (135.4, 148.2) | 6 (2, 19) | 403 |
rising ![]() |
7.7 (4.7, 10.8) |
La Crosse County 6 | 102.5 (92.1, 113.9) | 51 (29, 66) | 73 |
stable ![]() |
7.9 (-5.5, 23.1) |
Oneida County 6 | 131.0 (114.2, 150.5) | 19 (2, 47) | 46 |
stable ![]() |
9.2 (-3.7, 23.9) |
Waushara County 6 | 123.3 (103.2, 147.2) | 24 (2, 62) | 28 |
rising ![]() |
10.0 (1.5, 19.2) |
Shawano County 6 | 101.4 (86.4, 118.7) | 53 (24, 69) | 33 |
stable ![]() |
10.6 (-2.6, 25.7) |
Green Lake County 6 | 111.9 (89.2, 139.7) | 42 (3, 69) | 18 |
stable ![]() |
17.3 (-8.0, 49.6) |
Trempealeau County 6 | 130.9 (109.5, 155.5) | 20 (1, 58) | 28 |
rising ![]() |
19.8 (9.5, 31.0) |
Door County 6 | 151.8 (131.2, 175.8) | 2 (1, 34) | 43 |
rising ![]() |
19.9 (2.2, 40.5) |
Langlade County 6 | 145.7 (120.9, 175.3) | 5 (1, 49) | 25 |
rising ![]() |
24.0 (5.2, 46.1) |
Menominee County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/09/2023 11:10 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2021 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/09/2023 11:10 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2021 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.