Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin 6 19.0 (18.5, 19.5) N/A 1,373 rising rising trend 1.7 (1.2, 2.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 17.3 (17.3, 17.4) N/A 66,203 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7)
Eau Claire County 6 13.3 (10.5, 16.7) 62 (38, 67) 16 stable stable trend -23.2 (-43.4, 4.3)
Fond du Lac County 6 20.6 (17.1, 24.7) 21 (3, 53) 26 stable stable trend -10.7 (-21.1, 1.1)
Shawano County 6 19.2 (14.5, 25.2) 31 (4, 63) 12 stable stable trend -4.6 (-11.7, 3.0)
Wood County 6 21.8 (17.7, 26.6) 13 (3, 54) 22 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.6, 1.9)
Winnebago County 6 16.8 (14.3, 19.6) 52 (21, 62) 35 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.1, 0.0)
Outagamie County 6 13.9 (11.7, 16.3) 59 (40, 66) 31 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 0.9)
Oneida County 6 20.4 (15.3, 27.0) 23 (2, 62) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.3, 1.8)
Jackson County 6 17.0 (10.6, 26.1) 49 (3, 67) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.0, 3.8)
Richland County 6 13.8 (8.1, 22.7) 60 (6, 67) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.2, 4.5)
Walworth County 6 18.8 (15.5, 22.5) 36 (8, 60) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.1)
Langlade County 6 20.9 (13.0, 32.0) 20 (1, 67) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.2, 4.2)
Portage County 6 15.0 (11.5, 19.2) 57 (19, 67) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.8, 2.9)
Chippewa County 6 16.3 (12.6, 20.8) 54 (12, 66) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.9, 3.1)
St. Croix County 6 12.9 (9.9, 16.5) 64 (35, 67) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.1)
Trempealeau County 6 12.8 (8.3, 19.0) 65 (18, 67) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.4, 4.0)
Oconto County 6 18.9 (13.7, 25.6) 35 (3, 65) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.9, 3.6)
Waupaca County 6 17.8 (13.7, 22.9) 41 (6, 64) 13 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.7)
Barron County 6 17.5 (13.0, 23.1) 44 (6, 66) 12 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.0, 4.7)
La Crosse County 6 15.3 (12.4, 18.7) 56 (24, 65) 21 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 2.9)
Waukesha County 6 17.6 (16.0, 19.3) 42 (23, 56) 95 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 1.9)
Kenosha County 6 19.3 (16.6, 22.4) 29 (9, 55) 37 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.7)
Brown County 6 21.4 (19.0, 23.9) 18 (6, 42) 64 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 2.5)
Adams County 6 24.9 (16.5, 36.6) 4 (1, 63) 7 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.5, 6.0)
Door County 6 21.8 (15.9, 29.6) 14 (2, 62) 11 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.8, 4.2)
Marathon County 6 18.3 (15.4, 21.5) 40 (12, 60) 32 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 2.7)
Calumet County 6 18.3 (13.7, 24.1) 39 (5, 64) 11 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.7, 4.4)
Washington County 6 19.8 (16.9, 23.1) 24 (7, 53) 36 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.5, 3.1)
Columbia County 6 19.7 (15.3, 25.0) 27 (3, 62) 15 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.5, 5.5)
Clark County 6 16.9 (11.9, 23.4) 50 (6, 66) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.7, 5.9)
Green County 6 19.7 (14.5, 26.3) 26 (3, 63) 10 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.2, 5.4)
Price County 6 17.5 (10.4, 29.0) 43 (2, 67) 4 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.2, 6.4)
Milwaukee County 6 19.7 (18.5, 21.0) 25 (15, 43) 199 rising rising trend 1.7 (1.0, 2.5)
Dodge County 6 18.9 (15.4, 23.0) 34 (7, 60) 22 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.0, 4.6)
Ozaukee County 6 17.0 (13.8, 20.8) 48 (12, 64) 21 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.2, 4.1)
Rusk County 6 16.8 (9.2, 28.8) 51 (2, 67) 4 stable stable trend 2.2 (-4.0, 8.8)
Grant County 6 17.1 (12.8, 22.4) 47 (8, 65) 12 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.4, 6.2)
Racine County 6 24.5 (21.7, 27.6) 5 (2, 28) 58 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.9, 3.8)
Dunn County 6 16.6 (11.9, 22.6) 53 (7, 66) 9 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.4, 7.5)
Monroe County 6 20.4 (15.3, 26.7) 22 (3, 62) 12 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.3, 5.2)
Rock County 6 21.2 (18.4, 24.4) 19 (5, 46) 42 stable stable trend 2.4 (0.0, 4.9)
Dane County 6 19.2 (17.6, 21.0) 32 (15, 49) 108 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.9, 4.2)
Juneau County 6 21.4 (15.1, 29.7) 17 (2, 63) 8 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.1, 6.8)
Marinette County 6 23.8 (18.2, 30.9) 7 (1, 56) 14 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.9, 7.1)
Burnett County 6 17.2 (10.7, 27.4) 46 (3, 67) 5 stable stable trend 3.2 (-1.2, 7.8)
Crawford County 6 17.3 (10.8, 27.2) 45 (3, 67) 5 stable stable trend 3.2 (-2.2, 8.9)
Polk County 6 14.9 (11.0, 20.0) 58 (16, 67) 10 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.4, 7.0)
Washburn County 6 13.0 (7.4, 22.3) 63 (7, 67) 4 stable stable trend 3.3 (-2.0, 8.8)
Vernon County 6 18.7 (13.0, 26.4) 37 (2, 66) 8 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.6, 6.3)
Sheboygan County 6 22.7 (19.2, 26.6) 12 (3, 43) 33 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.0, 6.1)
Iowa County 6 21.7 (14.9, 30.7) 15 (1, 65) 7 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.2, 7.6)
Sauk County 6 21.5 (17.1, 26.8) 16 (3, 56) 18 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.6, 7.4)
Jefferson County 6 23.4 (19.4, 28.1) 9 (2, 47) 25 rising rising trend 4.1 (2.0, 6.3)
Lincoln County 6 31.1 (23.4, 40.8) 2 (1, 35) 13 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.2, 7.3)
Manitowoc County 6 23.4 (19.4, 28.1) 10 (2, 46) 26 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.6, 7.0)
Forest County 6 39.4 (23.7, 62.0) 1 (1, 55) 5 stable stable trend 4.5 (-0.3, 9.6)
Waushara County 6 19.6 (13.4, 28.2) 28 (2, 66) 8 rising rising trend 4.6 (0.1, 9.4)
Vilas County 6 29.6 (20.7, 41.4) 3 (1, 52) 10 rising rising trend 4.9 (1.9, 8.1)
Douglas County 6 19.3 (14.4, 25.4) 30 (3, 64) 11 rising rising trend 5.0 (0.4, 9.8)
Bayfield County 6 13.3 (7.3, 23.5) 61 (6, 67) 4
*
*
Green Lake County 6 18.4 (10.9, 29.1) 38 (2, 67) 4
*
*
Iron County 6 24.2 (13.7, 45.8) 6 (1, 67) 3
*
*
Kewaunee County 6 23.4 (15.7, 33.7) 11 (1, 64) 7
*
*
Lafayette County 6 23.7 (15.3, 35.5) 8 (1, 66) 5
*
*
Marquette County 6 15.4 (9.7, 24.5) 55 (5, 67) 5
*
*
Pierce County 6 9.7 (6.1, 14.8) 67 (46, 67) 5
*
*
Sawyer County 6 10.7 (6.1, 18.7) 66 (23, 67) 3
*
*
Taylor County 6 19.1 (12.3, 28.7) 33 (2, 67) 5
*
*
Ashland County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buffalo County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Florence County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pepin County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/09/2022 10:07 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Ashland, Buffalo, Florence, Menominee, Pepin

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top