Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Breast (in situ) (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin 6 N/A 34.3 (33.4, 35.2) N/A 1,229 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.4, 1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 29.3 (29.2, 29.4) N/A 57,211 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.1, 3.7)
Kewaunee County 6 Urban 26.0 (14.4, 43.6) 49 (3, 59) 3 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.4, 6.1)
Richland County 6 Rural 27.7 (15.6, 46.7) 40 (2, 59) 4
*
*
Crawford County 6 Rural 43.9 (24.9, 71.7) 6 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Price County 6 Rural 33.5 (19.5, 56.4) 19 (1, 59) 4 falling falling trend -6.1 (-50.3, -0.1)
Rusk County 6 Rural 35.3 (20.3, 58.8) 13 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Waushara County 6 Rural 24.0 (13.5, 40.2) 54 (4, 59) 4
*
*
Pierce County 6 Urban 20.8 (12.6, 32.3) 58 (15, 59) 4 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.7, 6.7)
Sawyer County 6 Rural 23.4 (14.1, 39.1) 55 (8, 59) 4
*
*
Washburn County 6 Rural 28.8 (17.4, 47.2) 36 (2, 59) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-7.2, 2.4)
Taylor County 6 Rural 37.0 (22.3, 58.1) 11 (1, 59) 4 stable stable trend 2.3 (-3.3, 9.2)
Iowa County 6 Urban 29.0 (17.9, 45.0) 32 (2, 59) 5 rising rising trend 5.3 (1.5, 10.8)
Jackson County 6 Rural 34.5 (21.2, 53.7) 17 (1, 59) 5
*
*
Vernon County 6 Urban 24.7 (15.2, 38.1) 52 (6, 59) 5 rising rising trend 6.1 (1.0, 13.7)
Adams County 6 Rural 28.8 (17.9, 46.4) 35 (2, 59) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.4, 5.8)
Langlade County 6 Rural 44.8 (27.7, 68.6) 4 (1, 57) 5
*
*
Barron County 6 Rural 18.1 (11.9, 26.8) 59 (28, 59) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.6, 2.2)
Dunn County 6 Rural 26.7 (17.7, 38.7) 46 (6, 59) 6 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.4, 8.8)
Vilas County 6 Rural 27.1 (17.0, 42.8) 45 (3, 59) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-7.6, 5.8)
Green County 6 Urban 26.3 (17.5, 38.2) 48 (7, 59) 6 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.4, 6.8)
Douglas County 6 Urban 27.2 (18.2, 39.1) 44 (6, 59) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.4, 5.2)
Oconto County 6 Urban 28.9 (19.2, 41.9) 33 (4, 59) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.4, 3.1)
Door County 6 Rural 22.8 (14.7, 35.1) 57 (11, 59) 7 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.4, -1.0)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 31.3 (21.3, 45.2) 27 (3, 59) 7 falling falling trend -7.1 (-30.9, -1.3)
Marinette County 6 Rural 28.4 (19.1, 40.8) 37 (4, 59) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.0, 4.6)
Grant County 6 Rural 27.6 (18.8, 39.0) 41 (5, 59) 8 stable stable trend -3.5 (-36.3, 1.2)
Trempealeau County 6 Rural 40.0 (27.6, 56.2) 9 (1, 55) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-7.8, 7.3)
Calumet County 6 Urban 25.1 (17.6, 34.8) 50 (12, 59) 8 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.9, 0.8)
Clark County 6 Rural 44.1 (31.0, 60.8) 5 (1, 49) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.0, 6.2)
Polk County 6 Rural 25.0 (17.5, 35.1) 51 (11, 59) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.7, 7.1)
Monroe County 6 Rural 32.2 (23.0, 44.1) 25 (3, 58) 9 stable stable trend 4.3 (-0.2, 10.4)
Oneida County 6 Rural 30.2 (21.3, 42.3) 29 (4, 58) 9 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.3, 1.6)
Waupaca County 6 Rural 24.7 (17.7, 33.8) 53 (13, 59) 9 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.7, -0.5)
Shawano County 6 Rural 34.9 (25.3, 47.2) 15 (2, 57) 10
*
*
Chippewa County 6 Urban 26.6 (19.4, 35.6) 47 (10, 59) 10 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.1, 1.0)
Portage County 6 Rural 28.3 (20.9, 37.7) 38 (8, 58) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.9, 2.1)
Columbia County 6 Urban 34.8 (26.0, 45.6) 16 (2, 53) 12 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.5, 4.9)
Sauk County 6 Rural 30.7 (23.5, 39.5) 28 (6, 56) 14 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.4, 5.6)
Manitowoc County 6 Rural 27.2 (21.0, 34.9) 43 (11, 58) 15 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.5, 4.8)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 29.1 (22.8, 36.9) 31 (8, 57) 16 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.2, 5.1)
Wood County 6 Rural 34.3 (26.9, 43.3) 18 (4, 52) 17 falling falling trend -6.0 (-25.6, -0.5)
Dodge County 6 Rural 32.3 (25.4, 40.6) 24 (6, 55) 17 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.0, 7.4)
Eau Claire County 6 Urban 32.6 (25.9, 40.5) 23 (5, 53) 18 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.0, 4.5)
St. Croix County 6 Urban 32.9 (26.3, 40.8) 21 (5, 52) 18 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.6, 10.2)
Walworth County 6 Rural 32.2 (25.7, 39.8) 26 (6, 54) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.7, 4.1)
Sheboygan County 6 Urban 28.9 (23.3, 35.5) 34 (12, 56) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.3, 0.4)
La Crosse County 6 Urban 29.7 (24.0, 36.5) 30 (9, 55) 21 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.6, 8.3)
Rock County 6 Urban 23.0 (18.7, 28.0) 56 (29, 59) 22 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.7)
Fond du Lac County 6 Urban 38.9 (32.0, 47.0) 10 (2, 38) 25 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 2.8)
Kenosha County 6 Urban 27.5 (22.9, 32.7) 42 (17, 56) 28 falling falling trend -2.8 (-11.3, -0.9)
Ozaukee County 6 Urban 47.3 (39.4, 56.4) 2 (1, 18) 29 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.7, 3.5)
Winnebago County 6 Urban 33.1 (28.1, 38.8) 20 (8, 47) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Marathon County 6 Urban 42.9 (36.6, 50.1) 7 (1, 24) 36 falling falling trend -3.6 (-7.9, -1.1)
Outagamie County 6 Urban 34.9 (30.1, 40.4) 14 (6, 43) 40 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.3)
Racine County 6 Urban 32.6 (28.1, 37.7) 22 (9, 46) 42 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.5)
Brown County 6 Urban 27.8 (24.1, 31.8) 39 (18, 54) 45 falling falling trend -3.7 (-15.1, -1.3)
Washington County 6 Urban 56.0 (48.8, 63.9) 1 (1, 6) 50 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.9, 5.6)
Dane County 6 Urban 36.7 (33.6, 40.0) 12 (7, 28) 109 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.7)
Waukesha County 6 Urban 46.1 (42.3, 50.1) 3 (1, 11) 123 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 2.3)
Milwaukee County 6 Urban 40.5 (38.0, 43.1) 8 (4, 17) 211 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.1, 2.9)
Ashland County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bayfield County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buffalo County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Burnett County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Florence County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Green Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Juneau County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marquette County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pepin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/08/2024 8:18 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Ashland, Bayfield, Buffalo, Burnett, Florence, Forest, Green Lake, Iron, Juneau, Lafayette, Marquette, Menominee, Pepin

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top