Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wyoming by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wyoming 6 N/A 204.1 (198.7, 209.6) N/A 1,200 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 222.9 (222.7, 223.2) N/A 734,330 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 0.0)
Niobrara County 6 Rural 131.9 (73.8, 221.0) 23 (3, 23) 4 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.7, -1.0)
Hot Springs County 6 Rural 191.3 (134.2, 265.9) 15 (1, 23) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.4, 2.9)
Johnson County 6 Rural 166.5 (127.9, 214.1) 22 (4, 23) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 1.8)
Washakie County 6 Rural 187.8 (146.2, 238.5) 18 (2, 23) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.7, 3.1)
Weston County 6 Rural 195.5 (151.9, 249.3) 12 (1, 23) 16 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.4, 3.6)
Crook County 6 Rural 199.1 (155.0, 253.0) 10 (1, 23) 18 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.8, 4.0)
Sublette County 6 Rural 205.7 (163.5, 256.2) 8 (1, 23) 18 stable stable trend 7.5 (-13.1, 31.8)
Platte County 6 Rural 205.3 (164.1, 254.9) 9 (1, 22) 21 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 0.8)
Big Horn County 6 Rural 188.6 (153.1, 230.2) 17 (2, 23) 23 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.6, 0.2)
Goshen County 6 Rural 178.8 (145.6, 217.7) 21 (3, 23) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.6)
Converse County 6 Rural 188.7 (157.1, 225.2) 16 (2, 23) 28 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Carbon County 6 Rural 214.0 (179.9, 252.8) 5 (1, 21) 31 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.9, 3.0)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 192.4 (164.4, 223.9) 14 (2, 22) 38 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.6, 2.7)
Uinta County 6 Rural 196.2 (168.6, 227.2) 11 (2, 22) 40 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.9, 4.3)
Teton County 6 Rural 218.7 (192.4, 247.8) 2 (1, 17) 53 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Albany County 6 Rural 216.5 (191.6, 243.7) 3 (1, 18) 61 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.0)
Sheridan County 6 Rural 193.8 (171.5, 218.3) 13 (3, 22) 63 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.4)
Fremont County 6 Rural 184.1 (164.2, 205.8) 20 (6, 22) 71 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Park County 6 Rural 262.7 (235.0, 292.9) 1 (1, 4) 78 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.5, 2.6)
Campbell County 6 Rural 187.4 (169.8, 206.3) 19 (6, 22) 91 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.9)
Sweetwater County 6 Rural 216.0 (196.4, 237.1) 4 (2, 16) 96 stable stable trend -8.1 (-19.5, 1.6)
Natrona County 6 Urban 206.5 (192.1, 221.6) 7 (3, 17) 170 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Laramie County 6 Urban 212.7 (199.6, 226.5) 6 (2, 14) 214 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/03/2024 7:41 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top