Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wyoming by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Ruralurban
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wyoming 6 N/A 1,820.4 (1,781.3, 1,860.0) N/A 1,727 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 1,975.2 (1,973.5, 1,977.0) N/A 1,010,129 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Laramie County 6 Urban 2,085.5 (1,984.1, 2,190.7) 1 (1, 6) 329 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.3, 4.9)
Natrona County 6 Urban 1,899.4 (1,787.9, 2,016.0) 5 (2, 14) 228 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Albany County 6 Rural 1,841.7 (1,660.7, 2,037.2) 10 (1, 18) 80 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.7)
Big Horn County 6 Rural 1,891.3 (1,653.5, 2,153.9) 6 (1, 18) 46 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.0)
Campbell County 6 Rural 1,763.8 (1,589.1, 1,952.8) 13 (3, 19) 86 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.3)
Carbon County 6 Rural 1,796.3 (1,562.9, 2,054.9) 11 (1, 20) 45 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.1)
Converse County 6 Rural 1,917.1 (1,667.6, 2,193.9) 4 (1, 18) 44 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.9)
Crook County 6 Rural 2,047.1 (1,724.5, 2,412.8) 2 (1, 17) 30 stable stable trend 1.9 (0.0, 4.2)
Fremont County 6 Rural 1,786.7 (1,648.7, 1,933.3) 12 (3, 18) 128 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Goshen County 6 Rural 1,456.3 (1,262.4, 1,671.5) 19 (13, 23) 41 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.2)
Hot Springs County 6 Rural 1,615.9 (1,315.9, 1,964.1) 18 (2, 23) 20 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.2)
Johnson County 6 Rural 1,658.0 (1,415.6, 1,929.9) 16 (3, 22) 34 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.5, 2.6)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 1,632.3 (1,435.9, 1,848.4) 17 (6, 22) 54 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.4)
Niobrara County 6 Rural 1,232.5 (853.9, 1,722.1) 23 (8, 23) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.0, 1.3)
Park County 6 Rural 1,878.9 (1,735.3, 2,031.4) 7 (2, 16) 130 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Platte County 6 Rural 1,874.3 (1,625.4, 2,150.5) 8 (1, 19) 41 rising rising trend 11.6 (0.5, 25.8)
Sheridan County 6 Rural 1,845.0 (1,695.1, 2,004.7) 9 (2, 17) 116 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
Sublette County 6 Rural 1,389.2 (1,148.5, 1,666.1) 22 (12, 23) 24 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.3, -0.5)
Sweetwater County 6 Rural 1,664.8 (1,507.5, 1,834.3) 15 (6, 21) 89 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 1.0)
Teton County 6 Rural 1,727.1 (1,532.1, 1,940.3) 14 (3, 20) 61 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 1.4)
Uinta County 6 Rural 1,405.2 (1,211.3, 1,621.9) 21 (14, 23) 41 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.9)
Washakie County 6 Rural 1,419.5 (1,174.9, 1,699.7) 20 (10, 23) 24 falling falling trend -5.6 (-10.5, -3.0)
Weston County 6 Rural 2,009.4 (1,679.0, 2,385.3) 3 (1, 18) 27 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/13/2024 9:12 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top