Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wyoming by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wyoming 6 N/A 429.5 (419.6, 439.5) N/A 1,557 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 481.1 (480.6, 481.5) N/A 888,315 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.0, 0.0)
Laramie County 6 Urban 496.2 (470.4, 523.1) 1 (1, 6) 294 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Natrona County 6 Urban 431.1 (403.4, 460.2) 9 (3, 16) 198 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Albany County 6 Rural 471.9 (423.9, 523.8) 3 (1, 14) 78 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Big Horn County 6 Rural 423.3 (362.5, 492.6) 12 (1, 21) 37 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.2)
Campbell County 6 Rural 348.7 (311.4, 389.2) 20 (13, 23) 82 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.5)
Carbon County 6 Rural 425.4 (367.6, 490.1) 11 (1, 20) 42 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 0.9)
Converse County 6 Rural 456.9 (393.3, 528.5) 5 (1, 18) 41 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.0, 10.6)
Crook County 6 Rural 482.9 (399.5, 580.7) 2 (1, 18) 27 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.0, 5.0)
Fremont County 6 Rural 402.6 (367.0, 440.8) 13 (5, 20) 103 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Goshen County 6 Rural 385.2 (329.5, 448.5) 16 (4, 23) 37 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 0.8)
Hot Springs County 6 Rural 376.4 (293.2, 480.8) 18 (1, 23) 16 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.0, -0.4)
Johnson County 6 Rural 350.2 (288.1, 424.2) 19 (7, 23) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 377.7 (329.7, 431.2) 17 (6, 22) 50 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.3, -1.1)
Niobrara County 6 Rural 278.6 (183.7, 418.6) 23 (8, 23) 6 stable stable trend -2.9 (-8.9, 3.3)
Park County 6 Rural 439.2 (400.0, 481.7) 7 (2, 16) 105 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Platte County 6 Rural 430.9 (365.5, 507.3) 10 (1, 21) 34 stable stable trend 4.4 (-1.6, 13.0)
Sheridan County 6 Rural 461.7 (420.7, 506.0) 4 (1, 14) 103 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.2)
Sublette County 6 Rural 340.5 (277.6, 414.7) 21 (9, 23) 23 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.7, 0.5)
Sweetwater County 6 Rural 455.2 (414.9, 498.4) 6 (1, 15) 108 falling falling trend -9.2 (-15.6, -1.2)
Teton County 6 Rural 401.0 (353.7, 453.3) 14 (4, 21) 58 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.9)
Uinta County 6 Rural 335.2 (288.3, 387.9) 22 (13, 23) 42 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.3)
Washakie County 6 Rural 388.2 (317.5, 471.9) 15 (2, 23) 23 falling falling trend -4.1 (-15.1, -1.5)
Weston County 6 Rural 438.1 (358.8, 531.9) 8 (1, 21) 24 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2024 10:22 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top