Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Illinois Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by rate
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 599,666 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) - -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Illinois - falling falling trend - 24,068 155.3 (154.4, 156.2) - -2.1 (-2.5, -1.6)
Monroe County 9 falling falling trend lower 60 125.5 (111.3, 141.2) 0.8 -1.8 (-2.2, -1.3)
Jasper County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 131.4 (106.4, 161.5) 0.9 -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
DuPage County 9 falling falling trend lower 1,478 132.6 (129.5, 135.7) 0.9 -1.7 (-1.8, -1.5)
Champaign County 9 falling falling trend lower 278 133.3 (126.2, 140.7) 0.9 -2.1 (-2.5, -1.8)
Kane County 8 falling falling trend similar 780 137.4 (133.0, 141.9) 0.9 -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
Washington County 8 falling falling trend similar 30 138.9 (116.9, 164.4) 0.9 -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Hancock County 8 falling falling trend similar 43 140.2 (121.3, 161.8) 0.9 -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Shelby County 8 falling falling trend similar 52 142.4 (125.2, 161.7) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Putnam County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 142.9 (110.5, 184.0) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Boone County 8 falling falling trend similar 92 143.0 (130.0, 156.9) 1.0 -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Effingham County 8 falling falling trend similar 66 143.5 (128.2, 160.4) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Clinton County 8 falling falling trend similar 71 144.8 (129.7, 161.3) 1.0 -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Jo Daviess County 8 falling falling trend similar 61 145.2 (128.6, 164.0) 1.0 -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Lake County 8 falling falling trend similar 1,141 145.5 (141.7, 149.5) 1.0 -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Calhoun County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 146.5 (112.9, 190.1) 1.0 -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Henderson County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 147.0 (115.7, 185.9) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Kendall County 8 falling falling trend similar 152 147.3 (136.7, 158.5) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Coles County 8 falling falling trend similar 98 148.9 (135.7, 163.2) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
McLean County 8 falling falling trend similar 263 149.0 (140.9, 157.4) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Edwards County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 151.9 (118.9, 192.6) 1.0 -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Cook County 8 falling falling trend similar 9,085 152.1 (150.7, 153.6) 1.0 -2.7 (-3.5, -1.8)
Jackson County 8 falling falling trend similar 101 152.9 (139.4, 167.4) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Henry County 8 falling falling trend similar 116 154.3 (141.7, 167.8) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Schuyler County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 154.6 (123.6, 192.7) 1.0 -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
McHenry County 8 falling falling trend similar 541 154.9 (149.0, 161.0) 1.0 -2.1 (-2.5, -1.8)
Cumberland County 6 stable stable trend similar 24 155.1 (127.7, 187.3) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Menard County 8 falling falling trend similar 28 155.5 (129.7, 185.5) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Adams County 8 falling falling trend similar 157 156.2 (145.0, 168.1) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Pope County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 156.8 (117.2, 210.3) 1.0 -1.1 (-2.5, 0.4)
Wabash County 8 falling falling trend similar 29 157.3 (131.7, 187.1) 1.1 -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Wayne County 8 falling falling trend similar 41 157.4 (136.0, 181.8) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Will County 8 falling falling trend similar 1,122 157.6 (153.4, 161.9) 1.1 -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Piatt County 8 falling falling trend similar 38 157.9 (135.5, 183.3) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Carroll County 8 falling falling trend similar 40 158.2 (135.7, 184.1) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Johnson County 8 falling falling trend similar 31 159.4 (134.8, 187.9) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Richland County 8 falling falling trend similar 39 159.9 (137.4, 185.6) 1.1 -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Woodford County 8 falling falling trend similar 84 160.1 (144.7, 176.8) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Bond County 8 falling falling trend similar 38 160.4 (137.8, 186.1) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Tazewell County 8 falling falling trend similar 304 160.6 (152.4, 169.1) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
Sangamon County 8 falling falling trend similar 426 160.6 (153.7, 167.8) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
McDonough County 8 falling falling trend similar 62 161.4 (143.2, 181.5) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Stephenson County 8 falling falling trend similar 119 161.7 (148.4, 176.0) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Rock Island County 8 falling falling trend similar 333 162.1 (154.2, 170.4) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Perry County 8 falling falling trend similar 47 162.5 (141.9, 185.6) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Fayette County 8 falling falling trend similar 51 164.1 (144.1, 186.4) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Edgar County 8 falling falling trend similar 47 164.9 (144.0, 188.6) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Clark County 6 stable stable trend similar 39 165.6 (142.5, 191.8) 1.1 -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Jersey County 8 falling falling trend similar 54 166.9 (147.1, 188.9) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Whiteside County 5 falling falling trend higher 147 167.5 (155.3, 180.6) 1.1 -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
DeKalb County 5 falling falling trend higher 174 167.5 (156.4, 179.3) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Stark County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 168.2 (130.9, 214.7) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
St. Clair County 5 falling falling trend higher 547 168.7 (162.3, 175.3) 1.1 -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
Madison County 5 falling falling trend higher 602 168.8 (162.7, 175.1) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.1, -0.8)
Bureau County 5 falling falling trend higher 92 168.9 (153.3, 185.8) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Massac County 8 falling falling trend similar 37 169.0 (144.9, 196.6) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Randolph County 5 falling falling trend higher 80 169.6 (153.1, 187.7) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Winnebago County 5 falling falling trend higher 638 169.7 (163.8, 175.9) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.0, -0.6)
Douglas County 8 falling falling trend similar 45 170.1 (147.9, 194.9) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Peoria County 5 falling falling trend higher 393 170.1 (162.5, 178.0) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Warren County 8 falling falling trend similar 41 170.1 (146.9, 196.4) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Greene County 8 falling falling trend similar 33 170.3 (144.8, 199.6) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Ogle County 5 falling falling trend higher 125 170.8 (157.4, 185.1) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Williamson County 5 falling falling trend higher 164 172.3 (160.5, 184.8) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Moultrie County 6 stable stable trend similar 35 173.0 (147.7, 201.7) 1.2 -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Macon County 5 falling falling trend higher 271 173.7 (164.3, 183.6) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Knox County 5 falling falling trend higher 135 174.3 (161.0, 188.6) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Crawford County 5 falling falling trend higher 49 174.4 (153.0, 198.4) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Jefferson County 5 falling falling trend higher 94 174.9 (159.1, 191.8) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Hamilton County 6 stable stable trend similar 23 175.3 (144.1, 212.3) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Union County 4 stable stable trend higher 47 176.7 (154.3, 202.0) 1.2 -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Montgomery County 5 falling falling trend higher 78 177.4 (159.8, 196.8) 1.2 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Grundy County 5 falling falling trend higher 100 177.7 (162.2, 194.4) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Franklin County 5 falling falling trend higher 105 178.4 (163.2, 194.9) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Livingston County 5 falling falling trend higher 93 178.8 (162.5, 196.6) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Morgan County 5 falling falling trend higher 90 179.1 (162.3, 197.3) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Lee County 5 falling falling trend higher 92 179.1 (162.8, 196.9) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
White County 4 stable stable trend higher 41 179.8 (155.1, 207.9) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Clay County 4 stable stable trend higher 36 180.6 (154.2, 210.7) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Macoupin County 5 falling falling trend higher 125 181.0 (166.6, 196.3) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
De Witt County 5 falling falling trend higher 42 181.7 (157.4, 209.1) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Kankakee County 5 falling falling trend higher 256 182.4 (172.4, 193.0) 1.2 -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Cass County 5 falling falling trend higher 30 182.8 (153.9, 216.0) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Christian County 5 falling falling trend higher 92 184.5 (167.6, 202.8) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Marshall County 4 stable stable trend higher 36 185.1 (158.2, 216.1) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.4, 0.1)
Mercer County 4 stable stable trend higher 47 186.3 (162.8, 212.9) 1.2 -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
La Salle County 5 falling falling trend higher 298 188.1 (178.4, 198.2) 1.3 -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Pike County 4 stable stable trend higher 48 191.4 (167.2, 218.7) 1.3 -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Logan County 4 stable stable trend higher 77 193.6 (174.4, 214.6) 1.3 -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Vermilion County 5 falling falling trend higher 213 194.0 (182.3, 206.5) 1.3 -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Lawrence County 5 falling falling trend higher 42 194.4 (168.6, 223.5) 1.3 -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Iroquois County 4 stable stable trend higher 86 194.6 (176.0, 215.0) 1.3 -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
Fulton County 5 falling falling trend higher 104 196.9 (179.9, 215.3) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Brown County 4 stable stable trend higher 15 200.1 (157.4, 251.7) 1.3 -0.4 (-1.6, 0.7)
Scott County 4 stable stable trend higher 15 203.0 (158.3, 258.1) 1.4 -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Saline County 5 falling falling trend higher 72 205.2 (184.0, 228.3) 1.4 -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Alexander County 4 stable stable trend higher 21 207.3 (168.1, 254.6) 1.4 -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Ford County 4 stable stable trend higher 41 207.8 (179.3, 240.2) 1.4 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Marion County 4 stable stable trend higher 115 207.9 (190.7, 226.4) 1.4 -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Hardin County 4 stable stable trend higher 15 210.1 (162.6, 270.7) 1.4 -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Pulaski County 4 stable stable trend higher 18 215.5 (172.2, 268.2) 1.4 -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Gallatin County 5 falling falling trend higher 17 218.4 (172.1, 275.1) 1.5 -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Mason County 4 stable stable trend higher 50 224.5 (196.7, 255.9) 1.5 -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/02/2024 3:05 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top