Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2019-2023

Nevada Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by rateratio

Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling - 605,771 145.4 (145.2, 145.6) - -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Nevada - falling - 5,438 144.8 (143.1, 146.6) - -2.3 (-3.0, -1.9)
Pershing County 9 falling lower 10 111.7 (82.8, 148.7) 0.8 -2.1 (-3.9, -0.1)
Storey County 6 stable similar 9 113.1 (79.0, 162.5) 0.8 -0.3 (-3.1, 3.1)
Lander County 6 stable similar 8 114.4 (81.1, 157.5) 0.8 -0.2 (-27.2, 19.4)
Elko County 9 falling lower 69 128.6 (114.9, 143.5) 0.9 -2.0 (-3.0, -0.9)
Humboldt County 8 falling similar 25 132.1 (108.9, 158.7) 0.9 -2.8 (-4.0, -1.6)
Douglas County 8 falling similar 137 134.0 (123.2, 145.7) 0.9 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Washoe County 8 falling similar 816 137.2 (132.9, 141.6) 0.9 -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Clark County 8 falling similar 3,791 145.5 (143.3, 147.6) 1.0 -2.6 (-3.7, -2.0)
White Pine County 6 stable similar 19 145.7 (117.4, 179.7) 1.0 -0.4 (-2.4, 1.7)
Lincoln County 6 stable similar 12 150.6 (113.2, 198.8) 1.0 4.4 (-2.1, 23.6)
Lyon County 8 falling similar 141 157.5 (145.4, 170.4) 1.1 -2.3 (-2.7, -1.8)
Churchill County 8 falling similar 56 159.3 (140.5, 180.1) 1.1 -2.7 (-10.5, -1.3)
Nye County 5 falling higher 176 165.2 (153.5, 177.8) 1.1 -2.0 (-4.9, -1.4)
Carson City 5 falling higher 149 172.6 (160.1, 185.8) 1.2 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Mineral County 5 falling higher 16 197.4 (153.1, 253.0) 1.4 -1.9 (-3.7, -0.2)
Eureka County
**
** similar 3 135.2 (75.3, 228.0) 0.9
**
Esmeralda County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/12/2026 2:22 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Esmeralda County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Eureka County

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States do not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top