Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2019-2023

Tennessee Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by rate

Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling - 605,771 145.4 (145.2, 145.6) - -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Tennessee - falling - 14,578 167.7 (166.5, 169.0) - -1.3 (-1.3, -1.2)
Overton County 4 stable higher 76 233.2 (209.5, 259.2) 1.6 -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Clay County 4 stable higher 30 228.1 (191.3, 271.3) 1.6 0.0 (-1.7, 1.7)
Gibson County 4 stable higher 151 224.3 (208.3, 241.3) 1.5 2.7 (-0.8, 8.2)
Chester County 4 stable higher 49 221.0 (193.5, 251.5) 1.5 0.4 (-0.8, 1.7)
Lauderdale County 4 stable higher 68 219.7 (196.3, 245.3) 1.5 -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Trousdale County 4 stable higher 25 217.1 (179.8, 260.0) 1.5 -0.5 (-1.9, 1.1)
Crockett County 4 stable higher 41 214.7 (185.4, 247.6) 1.5 0.8 (-0.4, 2.1)
Lewis County 4 stable higher 41 214.0 (184.7, 247.1) 1.5 6.9 (-0.9, 12.6)
Hickman County 4 stable higher 72 212.6 (190.5, 236.8) 1.5 -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Lake County 4 stable higher 18 207.3 (166.0, 256.9) 1.4 -1.4 (-3.0, 0.1)
Houston County 4 stable higher 26 206.7 (172.2, 247.1) 1.4 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
Henderson County 4 stable higher 79 206.0 (185.7, 228.2) 1.4 -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Union County 4 stable higher 57 205.1 (181.1, 231.7) 1.4 -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Cheatham County 4 stable higher 100 204.6 (186.0, 224.5) 1.4 -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Cocke County 5 falling higher 114 204.2 (187.0, 222.8) 1.4 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Rhea County 4 stable higher 93 203.8 (185.3, 223.9) 1.4 -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Hardeman County 4 stable higher 70 203.0 (181.9, 226.2) 1.4 -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
Benton County 4 stable higher 52 201.9 (176.7, 230.1) 1.4 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Morgan County 4 stable higher 58 201.1 (178.0, 226.7) 1.4 -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Carroll County 4 stable higher 83 201.0 (181.6, 222.1) 1.4 -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
DeKalb County 4 stable higher 58 199.6 (176.7, 225.0) 1.4 -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Grundy County 4 stable higher 41 198.5 (171.6, 228.9) 1.4 -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Dyer County 4 stable higher 96 197.4 (179.8, 216.3) 1.4 -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Dickson County 4 stable higher 134 197.2 (182.1, 213.2) 1.4 -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Polk County 4 stable higher 53 196.8 (172.9, 223.5) 1.4 -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Tipton County 5 falling higher 140 196.6 (181.8, 212.4) 1.4 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Wayne County 4 stable higher 47 196.6 (171.9, 224.4) 1.4 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Hawkins County 4 stable higher 173 195.4 (182.1, 209.5) 1.3 -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
McNairy County 5 falling higher 76 195.4 (175.7, 216.9) 1.3 -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Campbell County 5 falling higher 115 195.2 (179.0, 212.5) 1.3 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Obion County 1 rising higher 89 195.0 (176.8, 214.7) 1.3 7.8 (2.1, 13.1)
Claiborne County 5 falling higher 90 193.6 (175.4, 213.3) 1.3 -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Hancock County 4 stable higher 21 193.5 (156.8, 237.5) 1.3 -0.2 (-1.8, 1.6)
Hamblen County 5 falling higher 164 192.4 (179.3, 206.4) 1.3 -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Van Buren County 4 stable higher 20 192.3 (154.8, 237.7) 1.3 -0.1 (-2.0, 2.2)
Meigs County 4 stable higher 36 191.5 (163.3, 223.7) 1.3 -0.5 (-2.2, 1.4)
Macon County 5 falling higher 58 189.9 (168.1, 214.0) 1.3 -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Warren County 5 falling higher 103 189.7 (173.3, 207.5) 1.3 -1.6 (-4.8, -0.7)
Weakley County 4 stable higher 84 189.5 (171.4, 209.2) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Johnson County 4 stable higher 54 188.7 (166.0, 214.0) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Putnam County 4 stable higher 182 188.5 (176.2, 201.5) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.2, 0.2)
Fentress County 5 falling higher 56 187.9 (165.7, 212.8) 1.3 -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Henry County 5 falling higher 101 187.8 (171.2, 205.8) 1.3 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Smith County 5 falling higher 50 187.8 (164.6, 213.6) 1.3 -1.8 (-5.9, -0.8)
Marshall County 5 falling higher 82 187.4 (169.2, 207.2) 1.3 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Bedford County 4 stable higher 108 187.2 (171.4, 204.2) 1.3 -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Haywood County 4 stable higher 47 186.0 (162.0, 212.8) 1.3 -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Grainger County 5 falling higher 67 185.9 (165.6, 208.4) 1.3 -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Decatur County 4 stable higher 34 185.3 (157.3, 217.5) 1.3 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Greene County 5 falling higher 202 184.5 (172.9, 196.7) 1.3 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Robertson County 5 falling higher 156 182.8 (169.7, 196.7) 1.3 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Scott County 5 falling higher 52 182.3 (160.4, 206.6) 1.3 -6.9 (-17.3, -1.6)
Humphreys County 5 falling higher 52 182.1 (160.1, 206.6) 1.3 -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
McMinn County 5 falling higher 145 181.6 (168.3, 195.9) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Cannon County 4 stable higher 35 181.6 (154.9, 211.9) 1.2 -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Unicoi County 5 falling higher 53 181.1 (159.4, 205.5) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.7, -0.1)
Lincoln County 5 falling higher 92 180.3 (163.7, 198.2) 1.2 -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Monroe County 5 falling higher 129 179.8 (165.5, 195.1) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Sullivan County 5 falling higher 447 179.1 (171.5, 187.0) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Marion County 5 falling higher 76 178.2 (160.2, 197.9) 1.2 -1.8 (-3.1, -0.7)
Jackson County 4 stable higher 36 178.1 (151.8, 208.6) 1.2 -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Lawrence County 5 falling higher 104 177.5 (162.2, 193.8) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Coffee County 5 falling higher 136 177.3 (163.9, 191.5) 1.2 -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Pickett County 6 stable similar 17 175.3 (137.0, 223.7) 1.2 -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Sevier County 4 stable higher 244 175.0 (164.9, 185.6) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Giles County 5 falling higher 79 172.4 (155.2, 191.1) 1.2 -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Stewart County 5 falling higher 36 172.1 (147.1, 200.7) 1.2 -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Bradley County 5 falling higher 242 171.8 (162.0, 182.0) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Montgomery County 5 falling higher 304 171.5 (162.6, 180.7) 1.2 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Anderson County 5 falling higher 192 168.0 (157.3, 179.4) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
White County 5 falling higher 70 167.6 (150.2, 186.8) 1.2 -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Madison County 5 falling higher 214 167.0 (156.8, 177.6) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Jefferson County 5 falling higher 140 166.8 (154.4, 180.2) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Washington County 5 falling higher 308 166.7 (158.3, 175.5) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Carter County 5 falling higher 151 165.8 (153.9, 178.6) 1.1 -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Hardin County 5 falling higher 72 164.9 (147.4, 184.1) 1.1 -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Sequatchie County 2 rising similar 40 164.5 (141.5, 190.6) 1.1 6.6 (1.0, 16.9)
Shelby County 5 falling higher 1,637 164.2 (160.6, 167.9) 1.1 -2.4 (-4.4, -1.8)
Roane County 5 falling higher 148 163.1 (151.1, 175.9) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Cumberland County 5 falling higher 206 162.3 (151.6, 173.8) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Rutherford County 5 falling higher 484 160.7 (154.1, 167.5) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Sumner County 5 falling higher 387 160.4 (153.2, 167.8) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Franklin County 8 falling similar 100 158.5 (144.4, 173.6) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Perry County 6 stable similar 21 157.6 (127.8, 193.1) 1.1 -1.5 (-3.4, 0.5)
Maury County 8 falling similar 204 157.3 (147.5, 167.6) 1.1 -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Blount County 8 falling similar 320 155.5 (147.7, 163.5) 1.1 -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Knox County 8 falling similar 900 154.7 (150.2, 159.4) 1.1 -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Davidson County 8 falling similar 1,049 151.8 (147.6, 156.1) 1.0 -2.3 (-3.4, -2.0)
Fayette County 8 falling similar 100 151.2 (137.6, 166.0) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Wilson County 8 falling similar 272 150.2 (142.2, 158.7) 1.0 -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Loudon County 8 falling similar 152 149.0 (137.8, 160.9) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Hamilton County 8 falling similar 714 144.8 (140.0, 149.7) 1.0 -1.9 (-2.1, -1.6)
Bledsoe County 8 falling similar 29 127.5 (107.0, 151.3) 0.9 -1.7 (-2.8, -0.3)
Williamson County 7 stable lower 333 122.8 (116.8, 129.0) 0.8 -0.1 (-1.5, 3.0)
Moore County 6 stable similar 12 120.2 (91.3, 156.8) 0.8 -1.3 (-3.4, 0.8)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 1:00 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States do not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top