Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

North Carolina Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Male

Sorted by trend
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 315,770 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) - -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
North Carolina - falling falling trend - 10,427 187.5 (185.9, 189.2) - -2.5 (-3.0, -2.0)
Swain County 4 stable stable trend higher 23 256.7 (211.3, 309.7) 1.4 -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Cleveland County 5 falling falling trend higher 133 230.0 (212.1, 249.1) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Jones County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 221.3 (171.1, 283.2) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Surry County 5 falling falling trend higher 109 232.4 (212.9, 253.5) 1.3 -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Davie County 5 falling falling trend higher 60 202.9 (180.1, 228.1) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
McDowell County 5 falling falling trend higher 67 215.4 (192.4, 240.7) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Davidson County 5 falling falling trend higher 219 216.1 (203.1, 229.8) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Wilkes County 5 falling falling trend higher 96 198.6 (180.8, 217.9) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Macon County 8 falling falling trend similar 59 192.4 (170.0, 217.5) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Rowan County 5 falling falling trend higher 180 219.5 (205.0, 234.8) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Randolph County 5 falling falling trend higher 180 209.1 (195.2, 223.7) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Burke County 5 falling falling trend higher 122 203.9 (187.6, 221.4) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Yadkin County 5 falling falling trend higher 50 213.1 (186.9, 242.1) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Ashe County 8 falling falling trend similar 43 188.9 (163.5, 218.0) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Tyrrell County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 220.7 (151.6, 314.6) 1.2 -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
Halifax County 5 falling falling trend higher 79 236.2 (212.6, 261.9) 1.3 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Robeson County 5 falling falling trend higher 164 246.2 (228.8, 264.6) 1.4 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Anson County 8 falling falling trend similar 30 198.0 (166.1, 234.5) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Haywood County 8 falling falling trend similar 84 177.8 (160.6, 196.5) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Sampson County 5 falling falling trend higher 86 233.9 (211.7, 257.8) 1.3 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Stanly County 5 falling falling trend higher 77 201.0 (180.8, 223.0) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Person County 5 falling falling trend higher 53 207.1 (181.8, 235.1) 1.2 -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Hyde County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 198.5 (133.4, 286.5) 1.1 -1.2 (-2.6, 0.3)
Rockingham County 5 falling falling trend higher 132 217.2 (200.4, 235.1) 1.2 -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Richmond County 5 falling falling trend higher 59 223.6 (198.1, 251.6) 1.3 -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Greene County 5 falling falling trend higher 27 224.3 (185.8, 268.6) 1.3 -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
Alamance County 5 falling falling trend higher 192 208.2 (195.0, 222.0) 1.2 -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Craven County 5 falling falling trend higher 131 212.1 (195.8, 229.5) 1.2 -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Caldwell County 5 falling falling trend higher 113 208.8 (191.3, 227.6) 1.2 -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Onslow County 5 falling falling trend higher 149 234.8 (217.7, 252.7) 1.3 -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Caswell County 5 falling falling trend higher 38 223.6 (191.7, 260.0) 1.3 -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Gaston County 5 falling falling trend higher 243 205.0 (193.2, 217.3) 1.2 -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Alexander County 8 falling falling trend similar 47 189.2 (165.0, 216.2) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Chowan County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 200.5 (163.4, 245.1) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Dare County 8 falling falling trend similar 52 194.7 (170.5, 221.7) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Jackson County 8 falling falling trend similar 48 176.6 (154.2, 201.7) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
Forsyth County 8 falling falling trend similar 356 182.7 (174.2, 191.7) 1.0 -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
Henderson County 9 falling falling trend lower 150 159.5 (148.0, 171.9) 0.9 -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Lincoln County 5 falling falling trend higher 99 196.0 (178.3, 214.9) 1.1 -1.6 (-2.0, -1.3)
Scotland County 5 falling falling trend higher 45 217.8 (189.1, 249.7) 1.2 -1.6 (-2.3, -1.0)
Mitchell County 8 falling falling trend similar 24 209.0 (171.6, 253.4) 1.2 -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Iredell County 8 falling falling trend similar 172 184.9 (172.3, 198.2) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Catawba County 5 falling falling trend higher 183 199.7 (186.6, 213.6) 1.1 -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Brunswick County 8 falling falling trend similar 222 180.8 (169.2, 193.1) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Nash County 5 falling falling trend higher 115 208.9 (191.5, 227.6) 1.2 -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Vance County 5 falling falling trend higher 63 246.3 (218.6, 276.8) 1.4 -1.7 (-2.3, -1.2)
Washington County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 212.6 (168.1, 266.8) 1.2 -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Wayne County 5 falling falling trend higher 142 213.2 (197.4, 230.0) 1.2 -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Carteret County 8 falling falling trend similar 109 193.9 (177.3, 211.8) 1.1 -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Buncombe County 8 falling falling trend similar 280 171.1 (162.1, 180.6) 1.0 -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
Lenoir County 5 falling falling trend higher 74 206.3 (185.2, 229.3) 1.2 -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Franklin County 5 falling falling trend higher 80 210.1 (189.1, 232.8) 1.2 -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Edgecombe County 5 falling falling trend higher 76 243.0 (218.2, 269.9) 1.4 -1.8 (-2.3, -1.4)
Wilson County 5 falling falling trend higher 92 197.3 (179.1, 216.9) 1.1 -1.8 (-2.3, -1.4)
Montgomery County 8 falling falling trend similar 37 202.3 (173.1, 235.5) 1.1 -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Northampton County 8 falling falling trend similar 28 182.5 (151.7, 218.6) 1.0 -1.8 (-2.7, -1.0)
Guilford County 8 falling falling trend similar 477 179.5 (172.2, 187.0) 1.0 -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Cumberland County 5 falling falling trend higher 268 200.9 (189.9, 212.4) 1.1 -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Lee County 5 falling falling trend higher 72 209.6 (187.8, 233.3) 1.2 -1.9 (-2.3, -1.4)
Moore County 8 falling falling trend similar 127 164.7 (151.8, 178.6) 0.9 -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Columbus County 5 falling falling trend higher 77 217.6 (195.6, 241.5) 1.2 -1.9 (-2.4, -1.3)
Pender County 8 falling falling trend similar 74 196.1 (175.8, 218.3) 1.1 -1.9 (-2.4, -1.3)
Stokes County 5 falling falling trend higher 67 211.1 (188.2, 236.4) 1.2 -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Watauga County 9 falling falling trend lower 41 139.8 (120.8, 161.2) 0.8 -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Avery County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 150.1 (121.6, 184.3) 0.8 -1.9 (-3.0, -0.9)
Harnett County 5 falling falling trend higher 121 208.0 (190.9, 226.1) 1.2 -2.0 (-2.4, -1.6)
Union County 8 falling falling trend similar 183 174.7 (162.8, 187.2) 1.0 -2.0 (-2.4, -1.6)
Chatham County 8 falling falling trend similar 93 163.7 (148.9, 179.9) 0.9 -2.0 (-2.5, -1.6)
Cherokee County 8 falling falling trend similar 45 166.8 (144.1, 193.0) 0.9 -2.0 (-2.6, -1.3)
Transylvania County 8 falling falling trend similar 52 158.0 (137.9, 181.1) 0.9 -2.0 (-2.6, -1.3)
Beaufort County 5 falling falling trend higher 70 203.3 (181.4, 227.4) 1.1 -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Bladen County 5 falling falling trend higher 48 209.8 (182.8, 240.1) 1.2 -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Polk County 9 falling falling trend lower 29 144.0 (120.2, 172.7) 0.8 -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Graham County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 169.3 (127.7, 222.8) 1.0 -2.0 (-3.2, -0.7)
Cabarrus County 8 falling falling trend similar 160 172.1 (159.9, 185.0) 1.0 -2.1 (-2.4, -1.7)
Clay County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 150.7 (116.0, 195.0) 0.8 -2.1 (-3.0, -1.2)
Johnston County 5 falling falling trend higher 181 202.2 (188.3, 216.9) 1.1 -2.2 (-2.5, -1.9)
New Hanover County 8 falling falling trend similar 225 172.5 (162.3, 183.1) 1.0 -2.2 (-2.5, -1.9)
Pasquotank County 5 falling falling trend higher 48 213.2 (186.4, 242.8) 1.2 -2.2 (-2.6, -1.7)
Alleghany County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 172.1 (138.0, 214.8) 1.0 -2.2 (-3.1, -1.2)
Mecklenburg County 8 falling falling trend similar 665 162.1 (156.3, 167.9) 0.9 -2.3 (-2.4, -2.1)
Camden County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 205.8 (157.2, 265.3) 1.2 -2.3 (-3.6, -0.9)
Gates County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 176.8 (135.7, 227.7) 1.0 -2.3 (-3.6, -1.1)
Orange County 9 falling falling trend lower 98 150.6 (136.9, 165.3) 0.8 -2.4 (-2.9, -1.8)
Hertford County 8 falling falling trend similar 28 188.6 (157.7, 224.3) 1.1 -2.4 (-3.1, -1.8)
Pitt County 8 falling falling trend similar 139 178.8 (165.2, 193.1) 1.0 -2.5 (-2.8, -2.2)
Bertie County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 192.5 (160.2, 230.2) 1.1 -2.5 (-3.1, -1.9)
Pamlico County 8 falling falling trend similar 21 173.9 (140.0, 215.8) 1.0 -2.5 (-3.3, -1.7)
Warren County 8 falling falling trend similar 30 182.6 (153.5, 216.8) 1.0 -2.5 (-3.4, -1.6)
Currituck County 8 falling falling trend similar 30 167.2 (140.0, 198.5) 0.9 -2.6 (-3.4, -1.7)
Perquimans County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 168.0 (135.1, 208.5) 0.9 -2.6 (-3.4, -1.9)
Hoke County 8 falling falling trend similar 40 204.6 (174.6, 237.9) 1.2 -2.6 (-3.6, -1.7)
Duplin County 8 falling falling trend similar 62 171.4 (152.2, 192.3) 1.0 -2.8 (-3.3, -2.3)
Martin County 8 falling falling trend similar 33 195.5 (165.6, 230.0) 1.1 -2.9 (-3.6, -2.1)
Durham County 8 falling falling trend similar 232 171.5 (161.4, 182.0) 1.0 -3.5 (-4.3, -2.6)
Madison County 8 falling falling trend similar 28 187.0 (156.5, 222.5) 1.1 -4.2 (-6.5, -1.8)
Granville County 8 falling falling trend similar 69 199.2 (177.8, 222.5) 1.1 -4.3 (-5.7, -2.9)
Wake County 9 falling falling trend lower 670 156.2 (150.7, 161.8) 0.9 -5.4 (-10.2, -0.4)
Yancey County 4 stable stable trend higher 31 214.2 (181.2, 252.7) 1.2 0.4 (-0.5, 1.4)
Rutherford County 4 stable stable trend higher 99 217.2 (197.8, 238.2) 1.2 0.5 (-1.7, 2.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/02/2024 3:56 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top