Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2019-2023

New York Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Male

Sorted by count

Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling - 318,737 171.5 (171.3, 171.8) - -1.8 (-1.8, -1.7)
New York - falling - 16,461 145.6 (144.6, 146.7) - -2.8 (-3.0, -2.4)
Kings County 9 falling lower 1,514 120.5 (117.7, 123.3) 0.7 -2.8 (-4.1, -1.6)
Queens County 9 falling lower 1,489 113.6 (111.0, 116.3) 0.7 -4.2 (-5.0, -3.6)
Suffolk County 9 falling lower 1,339 151.0 (147.4, 154.8) 0.9 -2.3 (-2.5, -2.1)
Nassau County 9 falling lower 1,089 130.9 (127.4, 134.5) 0.8 -2.3 (-2.6, -2.1)
New York County 9 falling lower 1,050 114.6 (111.4, 117.7) 0.7 -4.0 (-4.8, -3.5)
Erie County 8 falling similar 1,002 177.5 (172.5, 182.7) 1.0 -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
Bronx County 9 falling lower 917 144.3 (140.1, 148.7) 0.8 -3.5 (-4.5, -3.0)
Monroe County 8 falling similar 735 166.9 (161.4, 172.5) 1.0 -1.8 (-2.0, -1.6)
Westchester County 9 falling lower 724 124.7 (120.6, 128.9) 0.7 -2.7 (-3.0, -2.4)
Onondaga County 8 falling similar 447 161.5 (154.7, 168.5) 0.9 -2.9 (-4.8, -2.4)
Richmond County 8 falling similar 422 156.3 (149.5, 163.3) 0.9 -2.0 (-2.6, -1.6)
Orange County 8 falling similar 314 157.6 (149.5, 165.9) 0.9 -2.1 (-2.5, -1.7)
Albany County 8 falling similar 305 171.5 (162.7, 180.6) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2)
Dutchess County 9 falling lower 287 151.9 (144.0, 160.3) 0.9 -2.2 (-2.9, -1.6)
Oneida County 8 falling similar 275 187.9 (177.8, 198.4) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Niagara County 5 falling higher 261 188.9 (178.4, 200.0) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Saratoga County 8 falling similar 258 172.1 (162.5, 182.2) 1.0 -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Broome County 8 falling similar 233 179.9 (169.4, 190.8) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Rockland County 9 falling lower 211 119.7 (112.5, 127.2) 0.7 -6.4 (-10.6, -2.4)
Ulster County 8 falling similar 203 160.5 (150.4, 171.1) 0.9 -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Rensselaer County 5 falling higher 178 191.9 (179.0, 205.6) 1.1 -2.0 (-2.5, -1.4)
Chautauqua County 8 falling similar 153 175.2 (162.5, 188.7) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Schenectady County 8 falling similar 149 163.8 (152.0, 176.3) 1.0 -2.6 (-7.5, -1.8)
Oswego County 5 falling higher 140 195.6 (180.6, 211.5) 1.1 -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
St. Lawrence County 5 falling higher 128 191.9 (176.7, 208.0) 1.1 -2.0 (-2.7, -1.4)
Ontario County 8 falling similar 125 163.9 (150.8, 177.9) 1.0 -1.9 (-2.5, -1.4)
Steuben County 5 falling higher 123 189.9 (174.8, 206.1) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Chemung County 4 stable higher 113 212.9 (195.2, 231.8) 1.2 -0.2 (-1.0, 3.9)
Jefferson County 5 falling higher 111 192.7 (176.4, 210.2) 1.1 -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Wayne County 8 falling similar 109 174.9 (159.9, 191.1) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Clinton County 5 falling higher 95 189.4 (172.2, 208.0) 1.1 -1.6 (-2.3, -0.7)
Cattaraugus County 8 falling similar 90 171.7 (155.6, 189.3) 1.0 -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Putnam County 9 falling lower 89 144.1 (130.5, 158.8) 0.8 -2.4 (-3.3, -1.5)
Sullivan County 8 falling similar 86 161.9 (146.3, 178.7) 0.9 -2.4 (-3.0, -1.8)
Warren County 8 falling similar 84 173.8 (156.7, 192.4) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Cayuga County 8 falling similar 83 154.5 (139.5, 170.9) 0.9 -1.8 (-3.0, -0.6)
Washington County 8 falling similar 82 183.5 (165.6, 203.0) 1.1 -1.7 (-2.5, -1.0)
Madison County 8 falling similar 81 180.4 (162.5, 199.9) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Columbia County 8 falling similar 80 156.5 (140.9, 173.6) 0.9 -2.1 (-2.7, -1.6)
Greene County 5 falling higher 79 206.9 (186.3, 229.6) 1.2 -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Herkimer County 8 falling similar 78 182.7 (164.3, 202.7) 1.1 -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Tompkins County 9 falling lower 76 144.0 (129.5, 159.8) 0.8 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Genesee County 8 falling similar 74 189.5 (170.1, 210.6) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Livingston County 8 falling similar 74 190.4 (170.8, 211.8) 1.1 -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Otsego County 8 falling similar 72 176.8 (158.3, 197.1) 1.0 -2.3 (-3.1, -1.5)
Fulton County 4 stable higher 68 195.2 (174.3, 218.2) 1.1 -0.1 (-5.2, 6.9)
Delaware County 8 falling similar 63 164.5 (146.0, 185.2) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Chenango County 8 falling similar 63 178.5 (158.6, 200.5) 1.0 -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Tioga County 6 stable similar 63 174.4 (155.0, 195.8) 1.0 6.7 (-2.0, 12.5)
Franklin County 5 falling higher 62 199.7 (177.3, 224.4) 1.2 -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Allegany County 6 stable similar 60 191.1 (169.4, 215.1) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.8, 2.7)
Montgomery County 8 falling similar 59 182.0 (161.2, 204.9) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Orleans County 4 stable higher 55 215.6 (189.6, 244.4) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Essex County 8 falling similar 54 171.0 (150.5, 194.0) 1.0 -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Cortland County 8 falling similar 53 195.6 (171.9, 221.8) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Wyoming County 8 falling similar 50 183.6 (160.6, 209.3) 1.1 -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Schoharie County 8 falling similar 44 180.9 (156.9, 208.1) 1.1 -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Seneca County 6 stable similar 43 187.3 (162.0, 215.6) 1.1 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Schuyler County 4 stable higher 31 227.4 (191.1, 269.5) 1.3 -0.1 (-1.2, 0.9)
Lewis County 8 falling similar 30 165.9 (139.6, 196.2) 1.0 -2.3 (-3.8, -0.8)
Yates County 8 falling similar 30 168.6 (141.7, 199.7) 1.0 -1.8 (-2.9, -0.8)
Hamilton County 8 falling similar 9 161.0 (115.3, 230.8) 0.9 -3.0 (-5.1, -1.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 11:35 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States do not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top