Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Mississippi Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Male

Sorted by name
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 315,770 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) - -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Mississippi - falling falling trend - 3,575 225.9 (222.5, 229.3) - -1.6 (-1.7, -1.5)
Yazoo County 4 stable stable trend higher 36 276.4 (236.0, 321.5) 1.6 -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Yalobusha County 5 falling falling trend higher 22 264.0 (214.8, 322.1) 1.5 -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Winston County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 172.6 (139.7, 211.5) 1.0 -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7)
Wilkinson County 4 stable stable trend higher 14 275.6 (212.4, 352.1) 1.6 -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Webster County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 209.8 (157.7, 274.4) 1.2 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Wayne County 8 falling falling trend similar 23 207.3 (170.1, 250.3) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Washington County 5 falling falling trend higher 60 265.1 (234.1, 299.1) 1.5 -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Warren County 5 falling falling trend higher 59 227.0 (200.6, 256.0) 1.3 -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Walthall County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 179.9 (143.3, 223.9) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Union County 4 stable stable trend higher 41 259.9 (224.6, 299.3) 1.5 -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Tunica County 5 falling falling trend higher 13 272.2 (207.5, 350.9) 1.5 -2.0 (-3.2, -0.7)
Tishomingo County 5 falling falling trend higher 31 249.6 (210.5, 294.3) 1.4 -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Tippah County 4 stable stable trend higher 34 276.5 (234.9, 323.5) 1.6 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Tate County 4 stable stable trend higher 35 223.8 (190.8, 260.9) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Tallahatchie County 4 stable stable trend higher 19 260.6 (209.5, 320.4) 1.5 -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Sunflower County 4 stable stable trend higher 39 314.7 (270.1, 364.5) 1.8 -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Stone County 5 falling falling trend higher 25 245.6 (202.3, 295.6) 1.4 -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Smith County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 177.4 (141.8, 220.0) 1.0 -6.1 (-9.0, -3.0)
Simpson County 8 falling falling trend similar 29 184.1 (154.4, 218.1) 1.0 -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Sharkey County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 248.8 (170.7, 353.6) 1.4 -2.6 (-3.9, -1.3)
Scott County 5 falling falling trend higher 37 255.0 (218.3, 296.0) 1.4 -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Rankin County 8 falling falling trend similar 132 167.9 (155.0, 181.6) 0.9 -3.1 (-4.9, -1.2)
Quitman County 5 falling falling trend higher 12 298.9 (225.6, 389.6) 1.7 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Prentiss County 4 stable stable trend higher 36 243.4 (208.4, 282.8) 1.4 -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Pontotoc County 5 falling falling trend higher 38 224.9 (193.1, 260.5) 1.3 -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Pike County 5 falling falling trend higher 47 214.6 (187.2, 244.9) 1.2 -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Perry County 4 stable stable trend higher 17 228.3 (180.8, 285.1) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Pearl River County 5 falling falling trend higher 81 233.9 (210.9, 258.9) 1.3 -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Panola County 5 falling falling trend higher 44 233.3 (202.3, 267.7) 1.3 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Oktibbeha County 8 falling falling trend similar 38 200.6 (172.2, 232.2) 1.1 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Noxubee County 5 falling falling trend higher 14 257.9 (198.9, 329.2) 1.5 -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
Newton County 5 falling falling trend higher 27 241.9 (202.3, 287.2) 1.4 -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Neshoba County 4 stable stable trend higher 36 236.8 (202.5, 275.4) 1.3 -0.2 (-0.8, 0.3)
Montgomery County 5 falling falling trend higher 16 247.1 (193.8, 311.7) 1.4 -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Monroe County 5 falling falling trend higher 48 216.9 (189.6, 247.3) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Marshall County 5 falling falling trend higher 57 271.2 (239.0, 306.7) 1.5 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Marion County 5 falling falling trend higher 33 215.8 (183.5, 252.6) 1.2 -1.9 (-2.7, -1.2)
Madison County 5 falling falling trend higher 126 290.1 (266.2, 315.4) 1.6 -2.9 (-4.4, -1.5)
Lowndes County 5 falling falling trend higher 78 261.4 (235.1, 289.9) 1.5 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Lincoln County 5 falling falling trend higher 44 230.2 (199.9, 263.9) 1.3 -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Leflore County 4 stable stable trend higher 39 303.4 (260.8, 350.9) 1.7 -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Lee County 5 falling falling trend higher 109 270.3 (247.2, 294.9) 1.5 -3.9 (-6.7, -1.0)
Leake County 5 falling falling trend higher 27 216.3 (180.3, 257.4) 1.2 -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Lawrence County 4 stable stable trend higher 20 270.1 (217.6, 331.7) 1.5 -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Lauderdale County 8 falling falling trend similar 81 191.3 (172.7, 211.5) 1.1 -3.5 (-4.4, -2.6)
Lamar County 8 falling falling trend similar 47 162.1 (141.5, 184.8) 0.9 -2.5 (-3.1, -1.9)
Lafayette County 8 falling falling trend similar 42 192.6 (165.8, 222.4) 1.1 -2.1 (-2.7, -1.6)
Kemper County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 183.8 (140.6, 238.0) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Jones County 8 falling falling trend similar 71 188.3 (168.8, 209.5) 1.1 -1.8 (-2.3, -1.4)
Jefferson Davis County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 199.7 (155.5, 253.8) 1.1 -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Jefferson County 4 stable stable trend higher 11 269.6 (199.8, 356.6) 1.5 -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Jasper County 5 falling falling trend higher 25 221.5 (183.8, 265.5) 1.2 -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Jackson County 5 falling falling trend higher 171 217.1 (202.2, 232.8) 1.2 -1.9 (-2.4, -1.5)
Itawamba County 8 falling falling trend similar 27 194.9 (163.0, 231.5) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Issaquena County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Humphreys County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 230.2 (169.8, 305.9) 1.3 -4.5 (-6.8, -2.2)
Holmes County 4 stable stable trend higher 23 261.4 (214.6, 315.5) 1.5 -0.7 (-1.8, 0.3)
Hinds County 4 stable stable trend higher 246 223.3 (210.5, 236.7) 1.3 -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Harrison County 5 falling falling trend higher 260 243.2 (229.8, 257.3) 1.4 -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Hancock County 8 falling falling trend similar 65 199.8 (178.0, 223.9) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Grenada County 4 stable stable trend higher 30 249.5 (209.7, 295.0) 1.4 -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Greene County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 183.5 (142.2, 233.2) 1.0 -2.2 (-3.3, -1.0)
George County 5 falling falling trend higher 29 246.9 (205.9, 293.5) 1.4 -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Franklin County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 156.4 (110.1, 217.3) 0.9 -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Forrest County 5 falling falling trend higher 77 225.3 (202.8, 249.5) 1.3 -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
DeSoto County 5 falling falling trend higher 171 213.1 (198.3, 228.7) 1.2 -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Covington County 5 falling falling trend higher 26 249.5 (207.5, 297.7) 1.4 -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Copiah County 5 falling falling trend higher 36 223.4 (190.8, 260.2) 1.3 -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Coahoma County 4 stable stable trend higher 31 266.0 (223.6, 314.3) 1.5 -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Clay County 5 falling falling trend higher 26 222.0 (184.4, 265.5) 1.3 -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Clarke County 4 stable stable trend higher 25 236.0 (195.2, 283.6) 1.3 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Claiborne County 4 stable stable trend higher 12 281.0 (211.8, 365.8) 1.6 -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Choctaw County 8 falling falling trend similar 10 177.2 (130.9, 236.6) 1.0 -2.1 (-3.3, -0.8)
Chickasaw County 5 falling falling trend higher 25 260.9 (216.0, 312.6) 1.5 -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Carroll County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 193.5 (151.0, 246.2) 1.1 -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Calhoun County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 214.2 (171.1, 265.5) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Bolivar County 5 falling falling trend higher 48 327.9 (284.8, 375.6) 1.8 -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Benton County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 167.9 (122.2, 226.8) 0.9 -4.8 (-7.0, -2.6)
Attala County 4 stable stable trend higher 28 241.8 (202.3, 287.4) 1.4 -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Amite County 8 falling falling trend similar 16 162.6 (128.3, 205.0) 0.9 -3.6 (-4.9, -2.3)
Alcorn County 5 falling falling trend higher 51 227.7 (200.0, 258.4) 1.3 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Adams County 5 falling falling trend higher 48 252.6 (220.7, 288.0) 1.4 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/19/2024 3:43 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Issaquena County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top