Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2019-2023

Alabama Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Male

Sorted by priority index

Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index ascending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling - 318,737 171.5 (171.3, 171.8) - -1.8 (-1.8, -1.7)
Alabama - falling - 5,616 194.4 (192.1, 196.8) - -2.2 (-2.6, -2.0)
Shelby County 9 falling lower 171 139.4 (129.8, 149.4) 0.8 -2.5 (-3.2, -1.6)
Autauga County 8 falling similar 60 180.0 (159.6, 202.4) 1.0 -2.5 (-3.5, -1.4)
Baldwin County 8 falling similar 290 173.5 (164.3, 183.0) 1.0 -2.5 (-5.3, -1.8)
Coffee County 8 falling similar 54 177.3 (156.3, 200.4) 1.0 -2.3 (-3.1, -1.5)
Conecuh County 8 falling similar 18 195.5 (154.9, 245.1) 1.1 -2.2 (-4.0, -0.4)
Coosa County 8 falling similar 18 207.4 (164.5, 260.3) 1.2 -2.3 (-4.0, -0.5)
Cullman County 8 falling similar 105 187.9 (171.5, 205.5) 1.1 -1.9 (-2.6, -1.3)
DeKalb County 8 falling similar 79 187.3 (168.3, 207.8) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.6)
Lauderdale County 8 falling similar 105 173.7 (158.6, 190.0) 1.0 -4.1 (-6.1, -3.0)
Limestone County 8 falling similar 99 164.9 (149.9, 180.9) 1.0 -2.7 (-7.3, -1.5)
Madison County 8 falling similar 336 163.4 (155.4, 171.7) 1.0 -2.2 (-2.6, -1.8)
Marengo County 8 falling similar 24 191.3 (157.6, 230.6) 1.1 -2.2 (-3.5, -1.0)
Morgan County 8 falling similar 135 182.6 (168.6, 197.4) 1.1 -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Perry County 8 falling similar 7 132.7 (92.1, 187.3) 0.8 -16.1 (-46.2, -3.4)
Randolph County 8 falling similar 30 190.5 (159.2, 226.8) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.6, -0.1)
Tallapoosa County 8 falling similar 59 185.7 (164.2, 209.7) 1.1 -1.8 (-3.3, -0.4)
Tuscaloosa County 8 falling similar 174 167.7 (156.1, 179.9) 1.0 -2.7 (-3.2, -2.2)
Washington County 8 falling similar 18 171.9 (137.0, 213.9) 1.0 -8.2 (-20.4, -3.7)
Bibb County 6 stable similar 28 207.2 (173.0, 246.4) 1.2 -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Bullock County 6 stable similar 10 173.2 (126.3, 231.9) 1.0 -2.0 (-4.7, 0.4)
Choctaw County 6 stable similar 20 202.0 (163.1, 249.2) 1.2 2.5 (-1.2, 11.0)
Fayette County 6 stable similar 23 199.4 (163.0, 242.4) 1.2 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Greene County 6 stable similar 12 212.6 (158.1, 281.9) 1.2 1.9 (-1.1, 13.2)
Hale County 6 stable similar 20 212.7 (170.8, 262.6) 1.2 -1.8 (-3.7, 0.0)
Lowndes County 6 stable similar 13 192.0 (146.1, 249.0) 1.1 -1.5 (-3.8, 0.7)
Monroe County 6 stable similar 26 193.7 (159.9, 233.1) 1.1 -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Sumter County 6 stable similar 14 211.0 (160.2, 273.2) 1.2 -1.2 (-3.3, 0.8)
Barbour County 5 falling higher 37 225.7 (193.6, 261.9) 1.3 -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Blount County 5 falling higher 75 200.0 (179.8, 222.0) 1.2 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Calhoun County 5 falling higher 144 220.3 (203.7, 238.0) 1.3 -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Chambers County 5 falling higher 49 222.1 (193.8, 253.6) 1.3 -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Chilton County 5 falling higher 62 236.3 (209.7, 265.4) 1.4 -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Clay County 5 falling higher 23 225.8 (185.1, 273.9) 1.3 -2.1 (-3.9, -0.4)
Colbert County 5 falling higher 78 209.5 (188.7, 232.2) 1.2 -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Covington County 5 falling higher 58 218.0 (192.9, 245.9) 1.3 -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Dallas County 5 falling higher 45 202.7 (175.7, 232.9) 1.2 -2.2 (-3.4, -1.1)
Elmore County 5 falling higher 102 211.8 (192.7, 232.3) 1.2 -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Escambia County 5 falling higher 55 249.0 (219.5, 281.5) 1.5 -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Etowah County 5 falling higher 145 223.4 (206.6, 241.2) 1.3 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Franklin County 5 falling higher 38 210.0 (180.6, 242.9) 1.2 -2.1 (-3.0, -1.3)
Geneva County 5 falling higher 41 233.9 (202.0, 269.9) 1.4 -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Houston County 5 falling higher 124 198.8 (182.9, 215.8) 1.2 -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Jackson County 5 falling higher 79 223.1 (200.7, 247.6) 1.3 -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Jefferson County 5 falling higher 675 196.8 (190.0, 203.9) 1.1 -1.9 (-2.1, -1.6)
Lamar County 5 falling higher 22 215.0 (175.5, 261.9) 1.3 -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Lawrence County 5 falling higher 49 228.2 (199.1, 260.7) 1.3 -1.8 (-3.0, -0.4)
Lee County 5 falling higher 147 190.6 (176.2, 205.7) 1.1 -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Macon County 5 falling higher 26 231.0 (190.5, 278.1) 1.3 -1.9 (-3.4, -0.5)
Marion County 5 falling higher 47 227.4 (198.8, 259.4) 1.3 -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Marshall County 5 falling higher 115 210.8 (193.2, 229.7) 1.2 -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Mobile County 5 falling higher 463 202.0 (193.5, 210.8) 1.2 -2.2 (-2.6, -1.9)
Montgomery County 5 falling higher 231 203.8 (191.8, 216.4) 1.2 -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Pickens County 5 falling higher 26 208.2 (173.2, 248.7) 1.2 -3.3 (-4.6, -2.2)
Russell County 5 falling higher 74 259.5 (232.0, 289.3) 1.5 -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
St. Clair County 5 falling higher 114 213.1 (195.2, 232.3) 1.2 -1.8 (-2.5, -1.2)
Talladega County 5 falling higher 108 211.2 (193.0, 230.8) 1.2 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
Walker County 5 falling higher 93 231.4 (210.0, 254.6) 1.3 -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
Winston County 5 falling higher 36 209.5 (178.7, 244.7) 1.2 -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Butler County 4 stable higher 27 230.7 (192.4, 274.9) 1.3 3.4 (-0.5, 11.9)
Cherokee County 4 stable higher 42 206.5 (177.8, 239.1) 1.2 -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Clarke County 4 stable higher 36 236.7 (202.4, 275.6) 1.4 -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Cleburne County 4 stable higher 23 227.8 (187.0, 275.8) 1.3 -1.7 (-3.5, 0.2)
Crenshaw County 4 stable higher 21 247.1 (199.7, 303.1) 1.4 -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Dale County 4 stable higher 60 202.1 (179.1, 227.5) 1.2 -0.8 (-6.8, 6.5)
Henry County 4 stable higher 28 215.1 (179.6, 256.7) 1.3 -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Pike County 4 stable higher 36 224.6 (191.7, 261.7) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Wilcox County 4 stable higher 15 229.1 (176.9, 292.9) 1.3 -0.4 (-2.2, 1.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/15/2026 1:33 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States do not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top