Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Michigan Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Female

Sorted by name
Counties
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest
sort by priority index descending 		Recent Trend2
 County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
 Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
sort by rate descending 		Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 283,896 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) - -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Michigan - falling falling trend - 9,974 139.6 (138.4, 140.9) - -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Wexford County 6 stable stable trend similar 34 134.2 (114.3, 157.1) 1.0 -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Wayne County 5 falling falling trend higher 1,813 151.5 (148.4, 154.8) 1.2 -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Washtenaw County 8 falling falling trend similar 272 127.1 (120.3, 134.2) 1.0 -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Van Buren County 5 falling falling trend higher 78 143.8 (129.5, 159.5) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Tuscola County 4 stable stable trend higher 64 153.3 (136.5, 172.0) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
St. Joseph County 5 falling falling trend higher 65 147.9 (131.8, 165.6) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
St. Clair County 5 falling falling trend higher 186 153.9 (143.9, 164.5) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Shiawassee County 5 falling falling trend higher 78 149.2 (134.3, 165.4) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Schoolcraft County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 161.0 (123.3, 211.2) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Sanilac County 5 falling falling trend higher 53 162.2 (142.3, 184.4) 1.3 -11.8 (-18.5, -4.5)
Saginaw County 8 falling falling trend similar 208 136.7 (128.2, 145.7) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Roscommon County 4 stable stable trend higher 45 176.3 (151.4, 205.5) 1.4 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Presque Isle County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 109.1 (86.1, 140.0) 0.8 -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Ottawa County 8 falling falling trend similar 211 116.0 (109.0, 123.4) 0.9 -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Otsego County 6 stable stable trend similar 27 142.2 (118.3, 170.2) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Oscoda County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 153.5 (111.9, 208.8) 1.2 -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Osceola County 8 falling falling trend similar 27 149.2 (124.4, 178.4) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Ontonagon County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 167.6 (125.1, 233.2) 1.3 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
Ogemaw County 8 falling falling trend similar 29 149.7 (124.9, 179.3) 1.2 -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Oceana County 6 stable stable trend similar 30 141.3 (119.0, 167.3) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Oakland County 8 falling falling trend similar 1,133 123.9 (120.6, 127.2) 1.0 -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Newaygo County 5 falling falling trend higher 51 147.9 (129.6, 168.4) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Muskegon County 5 falling falling trend higher 181 147.8 (138.1, 158.2) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Montmorency County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 185.8 (138.5, 247.0) 1.4 -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Montcalm County 8 falling falling trend similar 62 137.2 (121.9, 154.0) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Monroe County 8 falling falling trend similar 155 139.1 (129.1, 149.7) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Missaukee County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 130.8 (102.0, 166.3) 1.0 -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Midland County 8 falling falling trend similar 85 132.5 (119.8, 146.4) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Menominee County 6 stable stable trend similar 29 135.6 (113.1, 162.4) 1.1 0.1 (-1.0, 1.1)
Mecosta County 6 stable stable trend similar 45 146.8 (127.4, 168.7) 1.1 -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Mason County 8 falling falling trend similar 36 138.0 (117.8, 161.6) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Marquette County 8 falling falling trend similar 59 124.2 (109.8, 140.2) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Manistee County 5 falling falling trend higher 36 155.0 (131.9, 182.3) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Macomb County 5 falling falling trend higher 952 147.5 (143.3, 151.9) 1.1 -0.7 (-0.8, -0.6)
Mackinac County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 135.4 (102.7, 178.3) 1.1 -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Luce County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 169.0 (116.8, 241.9) 1.3 -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Livingston County 8 falling falling trend similar 174 132.3 (123.4, 141.8) 1.0 -1.3 (-1.7, -1.0)
Lenawee County 8 falling falling trend similar 104 141.0 (128.7, 154.2) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Leelanau County 9 falling falling trend lower 24 102.6 (83.0, 127.0) 0.8 -2.2 (-3.1, -1.2)
Lapeer County 5 falling falling trend higher 95 149.2 (135.7, 163.8) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Lake County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 166.6 (130.4, 212.3) 1.3 -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Keweenaw County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Kent County 6 stable stable trend similar 474 120.2 (115.3, 125.3) 0.9 1.8 (-2.8, 6.6)
Kalkaska County 6 stable stable trend similar 20 151.9 (122.8, 186.8) 1.2 -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Kalamazoo County 8 falling falling trend similar 222 132.4 (124.5, 140.7) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Jackson County 5 falling falling trend higher 172 150.5 (140.3, 161.4) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Isabella County 6 stable stable trend similar 51 138.7 (121.7, 157.6) 1.1 -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Iron County 6 stable stable trend similar 20 162.0 (127.6, 205.7) 1.3 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Iosco County 8 falling falling trend similar 38 149.2 (126.3, 176.2) 1.2 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Ionia County 5 falling falling trend higher 56 147.5 (130.4, 166.3) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Ingham County 8 falling falling trend similar 223 133.3 (125.4, 141.6) 1.0 -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Huron County 6 stable stable trend similar 44 142.6 (123.4, 164.9) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Houghton County 5 falling falling trend higher 37 152.5 (130.4, 177.7) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Hillsdale County 6 stable stable trend similar 50 144.6 (126.4, 165.0) 1.1 -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Gratiot County 4 stable stable trend higher 46 163.0 (141.5, 187.2) 1.3 0.0 (-0.7, 0.6)
Grand Traverse County 8 falling falling trend similar 95 124.4 (113.0, 136.8) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Gogebic County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 140.4 (112.0, 176.0) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Gladwin County 4 stable stable trend higher 40 169.0 (144.6, 197.4) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Genesee County 5 falling falling trend higher 463 153.5 (147.1, 160.1) 1.2 -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
Emmet County 5 falling falling trend higher 45 154.8 (134.1, 178.4) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Eaton County 8 falling falling trend similar 114 137.2 (125.9, 149.3) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Dickinson County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 118.5 (97.8, 143.0) 0.9 -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Delta County 8 falling falling trend similar 50 146.1 (127.4, 167.5) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Crawford County 6 stable stable trend similar 17 135.9 (107.3, 172.0) 1.1 -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Clinton County 8 falling falling trend similar 67 121.4 (108.5, 135.5) 0.9 -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Clare County 4 stable stable trend higher 44 175.0 (151.4, 201.9) 1.4 -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Chippewa County 4 stable stable trend higher 40 156.5 (134.7, 181.3) 1.2 -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
Cheboygan County 8 falling falling trend similar 36 135.8 (116.0, 159.3) 1.1 -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Charlevoix County 6 stable stable trend similar 33 143.6 (120.6, 170.4) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Cass County 5 falling falling trend higher 61 150.8 (133.8, 169.8) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Calhoun County 5 falling falling trend higher 151 154.6 (143.4, 166.5) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Branch County 6 stable stable trend similar 42 139.1 (120.1, 160.4) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Berrien County 8 falling falling trend similar 178 141.4 (131.9, 151.5) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Benzie County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 114.8 (90.7, 144.8) 0.9 -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Bay County 4 stable stable trend higher 127 150.5 (138.5, 163.5) 1.2 -0.3 (-0.7, 0.0)
Barry County 8 falling falling trend similar 56 126.9 (112.0, 143.4) 1.0 -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Baraga County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 164.7 (121.0, 222.6) 1.3 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Arenac County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 140.2 (111.7, 175.5) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Antrim County 8 falling falling trend similar 24 111.9 (90.9, 137.4) 0.9 -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0)
Alpena County 4 stable stable trend higher 43 159.3 (137.7, 184.1) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.4, 0.1)
Allegan County 8 falling falling trend similar 104 130.1 (118.9, 142.2) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Alger County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 134.1 (97.6, 184.0) 1.0 -15.2 (-29.5, 2.1)
Alcona County 6 stable stable trend similar 19 153.4 (119.5, 198.9) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/01/2024 11:48 pm.

Trend2
     Rising    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above    when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar    when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below    when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Keweenaw County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top