Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

California Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by priority index
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 599,666 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) - -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
California - falling falling trend - 59,656 135.1 (134.6, 135.6) - -1.7 (-1.7, -1.6)
Butte County 5 falling falling trend higher 493 166.7 (160.0, 173.7) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Del Norte County 5 falling falling trend higher 64 170.7 (152.0, 191.3) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Humboldt County 5 falling falling trend higher 297 168.3 (159.5, 177.4) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Lake County 5 falling falling trend higher 185 179.9 (167.9, 192.6) 1.2 -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Shasta County 5 falling falling trend higher 445 166.0 (159.0, 173.3) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Siskiyou County 5 falling falling trend higher 129 170.5 (156.9, 185.3) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Yuba County 5 falling falling trend higher 141 184.9 (171.1, 199.5) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Amador County 8 falling falling trend similar 107 143.5 (131.2, 157.0) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Calaveras County 8 falling falling trend similar 123 141.9 (130.2, 154.6) 0.9 -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Colusa County 8 falling falling trend similar 32 132.5 (112.3, 155.3) 0.9 -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Fresno County 8 falling falling trend similar 1,336 139.5 (136.1, 142.9) 0.9 -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
Glenn County 8 falling falling trend similar 53 155.3 (137.0, 175.5) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Inyo County 8 falling falling trend similar 43 146.2 (126.2, 168.9) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Kern County 8 falling falling trend similar 1,170 148.8 (145.0, 152.8) 1.0 -1.4 (-1.5, -1.2)
Kings County 8 falling falling trend similar 184 144.4 (135.1, 154.2) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Lassen County 8 falling falling trend similar 49 145.1 (127.2, 165.0) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Madera County 8 falling falling trend similar 238 145.2 (137.0, 153.9) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Mariposa County 8 falling falling trend similar 46 145.2 (125.2, 168.2) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Mendocino County 8 falling falling trend similar 196 147.4 (137.9, 157.4) 1.0 -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Merced County 8 falling falling trend similar 377 154.3 (147.3, 161.5) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
Napa County 8 falling falling trend similar 282 141.4 (134.0, 149.2) 0.9 -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Nevada County 8 falling falling trend similar 247 135.4 (127.5, 143.9) 0.9 -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Plumas County 8 falling falling trend similar 53 149.1 (130.3, 170.6) 1.0 -1.8 (-2.2, -1.3)
Riverside County 8 falling falling trend similar 3,767 138.2 (136.3, 140.3) 0.9 -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
Sacramento County 8 falling falling trend similar 2,553 150.7 (148.1, 153.4) 1.0 -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
San Bernardino County 8 falling falling trend similar 3,030 150.7 (148.2, 153.1) 1.0 -1.6 (-1.7, -1.4)
San Diego County 8 falling falling trend similar 5,040 137.2 (135.5, 139.0) 0.9 -2.2 (-2.7, -1.8)
San Joaquin County 8 falling falling trend similar 1,141 150.8 (146.9, 154.8) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Solano County 8 falling falling trend similar 841 158.1 (153.3, 163.1) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Sonoma County 8 falling falling trend similar 978 137.5 (133.5, 141.5) 0.9 -2.3 (-2.8, -1.8)
Stanislaus County 8 falling falling trend similar 888 158.8 (154.1, 163.6) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Sutter County 8 falling falling trend similar 176 152.5 (142.5, 163.1) 1.0 -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Tehama County 8 falling falling trend similar 151 162.5 (150.8, 175.0) 1.1 -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Tulare County 8 falling falling trend similar 598 142.8 (137.7, 148.1) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Tuolumne County 8 falling falling trend similar 148 150.4 (139.2, 162.4) 1.0 -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Yolo County 8 falling falling trend similar 289 137.3 (130.1, 144.6) 0.9 -1.8 (-2.2, -1.5)
Alameda County 9 falling falling trend lower 2,278 125.0 (122.6, 127.3) 0.8 -2.3 (-2.4, -2.1)
Contra Costa County 9 falling falling trend lower 1,832 130.5 (127.8, 133.2) 0.9 -2.1 (-2.4, -1.8)
El Dorado County 9 falling falling trend lower 371 127.5 (121.6, 133.7) 0.9 -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Imperial County 9 falling falling trend lower 223 122.4 (115.2, 129.9) 0.8 -2.1 (-2.5, -1.7)
Los Angeles County 9 falling falling trend lower 14,616 133.3 (132.4, 134.3) 0.9 -1.5 (-1.6, -1.5)
Marin County 9 falling falling trend lower 480 111.7 (107.2, 116.4) 0.7 -2.2 (-2.4, -2.0)
Modoc County 9 falling falling trend lower 20 121.6 (97.3, 151.5) 0.8 -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
Mono County 9 falling falling trend lower 11 57.1 (42.3, 75.8) 0.4 -3.2 (-4.5, -1.8)
Monterey County 9 falling falling trend lower 559 121.6 (117.1, 126.3) 0.8 -1.8 (-2.0, -1.6)
Orange County 9 falling falling trend lower 4,707 127.1 (125.5, 128.8) 0.9 -1.6 (-1.7, -1.5)
Placer County 9 falling falling trend lower 745 130.2 (126.0, 134.6) 0.9 -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
San Benito County 9 falling falling trend lower 76 120.3 (108.2, 133.3) 0.8 -2.1 (-2.6, -1.5)
San Francisco County 9 falling falling trend lower 1,328 121.6 (118.7, 124.7) 0.8 -5.0 (-8.8, -1.0)
San Luis Obispo County 9 falling falling trend lower 548 134.1 (129.0, 139.4) 0.9 -1.5 (-1.6, -1.3)
San Mateo County 9 falling falling trend lower 1,110 114.0 (111.0, 117.1) 0.8 -2.6 (-2.9, -2.4)
Santa Barbara County 9 falling falling trend lower 687 130.0 (125.6, 134.5) 0.9 -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Santa Clara County 9 falling falling trend lower 2,388 113.5 (111.5, 115.6) 0.8 -2.6 (-3.2, -2.0)
Santa Cruz County 9 falling falling trend lower 410 124.8 (119.3, 130.6) 0.8 -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Sierra County 9 falling falling trend lower 6 98.1 (66.1, 148.6) 0.7 -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Trinity County 9 falling falling trend lower 28 116.3 (96.8, 139.7) 0.8 -2.2 (-3.1, -1.2)
Ventura County 9 falling falling trend lower 1,337 130.7 (127.6, 133.9) 0.9 -1.5 (-1.6, -1.3)
Alpine County
**
** similar 4 235.3 (137.9, 389.3) 1.6
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/19/2024 3:17 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).
Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Alpine County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top