Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Kansas Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by trend
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
United States - falling falling trend - 599,666 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) - -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Kansas - falling falling trend - 5,548 155.6 (153.8, 157.5) - -1.2 (-1.3, -1.0)
Kingman County 1 rising rising trend higher 38 353.6 (301.6, 412.9) 2.4 17.7 (4.3, 32.9)
Edwards County 4 stable stable trend higher 10 235.2 (169.3, 320.9) 1.6 1.2 (-0.3, 2.7)
Decatur County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 200.1 (143.3, 276.4) 1.3 1.0 (0.0, 2.1)
Rawlins County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 160.6 (114.7, 225.8) 1.1 0.8 (-0.3, 1.8)
Lane County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 220.8 (147.6, 327.1) 1.5 0.7 (-0.9, 2.3)
Woodson County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 161.4 (114.2, 225.7) 1.1 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Haskell County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 126.1 (82.6, 184.9) 0.8 0.6 (-1.0, 2.1)
Comanche County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 179.3 (120.3, 267.3) 1.2 0.5 (-1.2, 2.2)
Stevens County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 148.6 (108.8, 198.8) 1.0 0.3 (-1.4, 2.1)
Ellsworth County 4 stable stable trend higher 18 189.8 (151.7, 236.0) 1.3 0.3 (-0.8, 1.3)
Republic County 6 stable stable trend similar 16 192.2 (146.9, 249.2) 1.3 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Brown County 4 stable stable trend higher 27 184.5 (154.2, 220.0) 1.2 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3)
Wichita County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 190.2 (122.8, 284.4) 1.3 0.1 (-1.8, 2.0)
Kiowa County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 165.8 (112.1, 240.5) 1.1 0.1 (-1.5, 1.7)
Rush County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 200.9 (149.3, 269.1) 1.3 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Lincoln County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 157.0 (111.1, 220.4) 1.1 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Montgomery County 5 falling falling trend higher 79 166.6 (150.0, 184.6) 1.1 -3.9 (-6.4, -1.3)
Rice County 6 stable stable trend similar 22 162.8 (133.0, 197.9) 1.1 -2.7 (-5.6, 0.2)
Norton County 8 falling falling trend similar 10 120.6 (88.7, 161.9) 0.8 -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Rooks County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 144.7 (109.6, 189.6) 1.0 -2.0 (-3.0, -1.0)
Gray County 8 falling falling trend similar 10 140.0 (102.5, 187.2) 0.9 -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Wyandotte County 5 falling falling trend higher 297 179.6 (170.4, 189.3) 1.2 -1.8 (-2.5, -1.2)
Sheridan County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 115.6 (76.4, 174.8) 0.8 -1.7 (-3.0, -0.3)
Graham County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 145.9 (101.7, 210.7) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.9, -0.4)
Hodgeman County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 138.1 (87.7, 216.9) 0.9 -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Miami County 9 falling falling trend lower 58 129.6 (114.9, 145.8) 0.9 -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Leavenworth County 5 falling falling trend higher 153 166.2 (154.4, 178.7) 1.1 -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
Jackson County 9 falling falling trend lower 24 126.5 (104.8, 152.0) 0.8 -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Johnson County 9 falling falling trend lower 865 129.0 (125.2, 133.0) 0.9 -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Thomas County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 142.7 (111.5, 180.6) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Seward County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 138.5 (115.4, 164.6) 0.9 -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Ford County 8 falling falling trend similar 46 148.6 (129.6, 169.6) 1.0 -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Jewell County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 151.5 (110.1, 210.7) 1.0 -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Jefferson County 8 falling falling trend similar 41 156.3 (135.1, 180.2) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Douglas County 9 falling falling trend lower 149 133.6 (124.0, 143.8) 0.9 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Barber County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 153.7 (115.1, 203.6) 1.0 -1.1 (-2.1, -0.2)
Pottawatomie County 8 falling falling trend similar 38 141.5 (121.7, 163.7) 0.9 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Sumner County 8 falling falling trend similar 57 168.8 (149.2, 190.6) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Phillips County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 154.6 (118.2, 200.5) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Coffey County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 149.7 (119.8, 185.7) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Finney County 8 falling falling trend similar 48 149.9 (131.1, 170.6) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Sedgwick County 8 falling falling trend similar 929 159.2 (154.5, 163.9) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Gove County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 122.9 (80.3, 185.2) 0.8 -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Sherman County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 137.4 (103.8, 179.7) 0.9 -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Stafford County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 142.7 (103.1, 194.9) 1.0 -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Anderson County 4 stable stable trend higher 25 201.2 (166.3, 242.3) 1.3 -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Allen County 8 falling falling trend similar 31 159.0 (134.1, 187.7) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Ellis County 8 falling falling trend similar 48 141.4 (123.4, 161.3) 0.9 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Shawnee County 5 falling falling trend higher 401 165.3 (157.9, 172.9) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
Wabaunsee County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 145.1 (113.3, 184.4) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Osage County 8 falling falling trend similar 39 167.4 (144.2, 193.9) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Cherokee County 5 falling falling trend higher 55 191.8 (169.3, 216.8) 1.3 -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Elk County 4 stable stable trend higher 11 216.2 (156.7, 297.0) 1.4 -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Ottawa County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 167.1 (129.3, 213.9) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Smith County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 162.4 (118.3, 221.4) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Washington County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 143.7 (111.2, 185.0) 1.0 -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Morris County 6 stable stable trend similar 16 168.2 (130.5, 215.1) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Greenwood County 4 stable stable trend higher 21 202.4 (162.9, 250.4) 1.4 -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Pratt County 6 stable stable trend similar 24 159.5 (131.1, 193.1) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Atchison County 8 falling falling trend similar 36 171.8 (147.1, 199.7) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Geary County 5 falling falling trend higher 41 185.2 (160.3, 212.6) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Reno County 8 falling falling trend similar 140 151.9 (140.5, 164.1) 1.0 -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Mitchell County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 135.4 (103.0, 176.2) 0.9 -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Cloud County 6 stable stable trend similar 21 149.4 (120.8, 183.6) 1.0 -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Clay County 6 stable stable trend similar 19 138.5 (110.7, 172.3) 0.9 -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Barton County 6 stable stable trend similar 57 147.2 (129.9, 166.3) 1.0 -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Dickinson County 8 falling falling trend similar 47 158.5 (138.3, 181.2) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Riley County 8 falling falling trend similar 78 139.3 (125.4, 154.3) 0.9 -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Saline County 5 falling falling trend higher 124 165.9 (152.8, 179.9) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Butler County 8 falling falling trend similar 132 163.9 (151.3, 177.3) 1.1 -0.6 (-0.9, -0.2)
Logan County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 153.9 (101.1, 226.7) 1.0 -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Meade County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 148.9 (108.2, 202.0) 1.0 -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Osborne County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 159.1 (117.5, 214.7) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Grant County 4 stable stable trend higher 15 198.7 (155.7, 250.0) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Russell County 4 stable stable trend higher 22 196.0 (158.1, 241.4) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Bourbon County 4 stable stable trend higher 37 178.2 (152.4, 207.6) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Marshall County 6 stable stable trend similar 27 162.2 (134.6, 194.6) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Lyon County 6 stable stable trend similar 62 162.3 (144.4, 182.0) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Cowley County 5 falling falling trend higher 87 183.4 (166.1, 202.2) 1.2 -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Kearny County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 129.3 (86.3, 187.1) 0.9 -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Hamilton County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 179.7 (115.1, 268.2) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Trego County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 185.7 (138.2, 250.4) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Scott County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 156.9 (118.2, 206.0) 1.1 -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Pawnee County 6 stable stable trend similar 17 159.6 (126.4, 200.6) 1.1 -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Doniphan County 4 stable stable trend higher 23 205.4 (168.9, 248.4) 1.4 -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Nemaha County 6 stable stable trend similar 28 175.1 (145.2, 209.9) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Crawford County 4 stable stable trend higher 94 205.1 (186.5, 225.0) 1.4 -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Franklin County 4 stable stable trend higher 63 189.2 (168.4, 212.0) 1.3 -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Cheyenne County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 127.6 (80.2, 196.6) 0.9 -0.3 (-1.9, 1.2)
Marion County 6 stable stable trend similar 34 163.6 (138.5, 192.8) 1.1 -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Labette County 4 stable stable trend higher 50 171.8 (150.4, 195.6) 1.1 -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Harvey County 6 stable stable trend similar 78 154.7 (139.1, 171.7) 1.0 -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Neosho County 4 stable stable trend higher 42 179.8 (155.5, 207.1) 1.2 -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Clark County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 153.9 (96.2, 238.3) 1.0 -0.2 (-2.0, 1.6)
Chautauqua County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 160.2 (115.2, 220.8) 1.1 -0.2 (-1.8, 1.3)
Morton County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 175.1 (122.4, 246.8) 1.2 -0.2 (-1.7, 1.2)
Ness County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 150.4 (101.6, 218.6) 1.0 -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Harper County 4 stable stable trend higher 19 208.1 (166.9, 258.1) 1.4 -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Linn County 6 stable stable trend similar 27 169.9 (141.5, 203.4) 1.1 -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Chase County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 188.7 (129.9, 268.4) 1.3 -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Wilson County 4 stable stable trend higher 25 187.6 (155.3, 225.5) 1.3 -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
McPherson County 6 stable stable trend similar 71 154.6 (138.1, 172.7) 1.0 -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4)
Greeley County
**
** similar 4 220.9 (127.3, 362.9) 1.5
**
Stanton County
**
** similar 4 132.0 (78.4, 212.4) 0.9
**
Wallace County
**
** similar 3 159.1 (86.5, 272.1) 1.1
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/15/2024 12:02 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).
Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Greeley County, Stanton County, Wallace County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top