Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Mississippi Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by count
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 599,666 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) - -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Mississippi - falling falling trend - 6,555 181.0 (179.0, 183.0) - -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
Harrison County 5 falling falling trend higher 462 194.7 (186.7, 203.0) 1.3 -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Hinds County 4 stable stable trend higher 450 170.1 (162.9, 177.4) 1.1 -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
DeSoto County 4 stable stable trend higher 331 179.5 (170.7, 188.5) 1.2 -5.0 (-11.0, 1.5)
Jackson County 5 falling falling trend higher 307 178.0 (169.0, 187.4) 1.2 -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Madison County 5 falling falling trend higher 249 235.3 (222.0, 249.2) 1.6 -2.8 (-4.3, -1.3)
Rankin County 8 falling falling trend similar 247 135.9 (128.3, 143.9) 0.9 -2.5 (-4.1, -0.9)
Lee County 5 falling falling trend higher 201 204.9 (192.2, 218.2) 1.4 -3.7 (-5.0, -2.4)
Forrest County 5 falling falling trend higher 155 193.7 (180.1, 208.0) 1.3 -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Lauderdale County 8 falling falling trend similar 148 149.9 (139.0, 161.4) 1.0 -3.0 (-3.6, -2.4)
Lowndes County 5 falling falling trend higher 147 204.6 (189.8, 220.3) 1.4 -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Pearl River County 5 falling falling trend higher 146 195.3 (180.9, 210.6) 1.3 -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Jones County 8 falling falling trend similar 130 149.1 (137.6, 161.3) 1.0 -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Washington County 4 stable stable trend higher 119 216.1 (198.4, 235.0) 1.4 -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Hancock County 8 falling falling trend similar 111 159.7 (146.2, 174.2) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Warren County 5 falling falling trend higher 104 180.3 (164.7, 197.0) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Marshall County 5 falling falling trend higher 98 206.8 (188.4, 226.7) 1.4 -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Adams County 5 falling falling trend higher 92 207.6 (188.6, 228.2) 1.4 -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Lamar County 8 falling falling trend similar 91 137.9 (125.4, 151.4) 0.9 -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Monroe County 5 falling falling trend higher 91 178.8 (162.2, 196.7) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Pike County 5 falling falling trend higher 89 175.6 (159.3, 193.2) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Bolivar County 4 stable stable trend higher 88 239.5 (217.0, 263.7) 1.6 -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Alcorn County 5 falling falling trend higher 86 172.7 (156.4, 190.3) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Lincoln County 5 falling falling trend higher 83 187.6 (169.7, 207.0) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Panola County 5 falling falling trend higher 83 196.9 (177.9, 217.4) 1.3 -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Lafayette County 8 falling falling trend similar 76 145.2 (130.6, 160.9) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Leflore County 4 stable stable trend higher 74 232.6 (209.1, 258.2) 1.6 -0.1 (-0.6, 0.3)
Union County 4 stable stable trend higher 69 195.7 (175.3, 217.8) 1.3 3.3 (-0.1, 6.8)
Oktibbeha County 8 falling falling trend similar 69 160.1 (143.2, 178.5) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Pontotoc County 5 falling falling trend higher 68 179.8 (160.9, 200.4) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Sunflower County 4 stable stable trend higher 67 239.8 (214.4, 267.5) 1.6 -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Copiah County 5 falling falling trend higher 67 180.1 (160.8, 201.4) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Yazoo County 4 stable stable trend higher 66 222.3 (198.6, 248.1) 1.5 -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Neshoba County 5 falling falling trend higher 66 191.1 (170.5, 213.6) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Tate County 5 falling falling trend higher 64 182.6 (162.7, 204.4) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Scott County 5 falling falling trend higher 63 190.8 (170.0, 213.6) 1.3 -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Prentiss County 4 stable stable trend higher 62 179.8 (160.0, 201.7) 1.2 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Marion County 5 falling falling trend higher 61 178.2 (158.4, 200.1) 1.2 -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Coahoma County 5 falling falling trend higher 60 220.1 (195.2, 247.5) 1.5 -3.4 (-6.6, -0.2)
Grenada County 4 stable stable trend higher 58 209.3 (185.3, 235.8) 1.4 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Simpson County 8 falling falling trend similar 56 158.6 (140.1, 178.9) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Tishomingo County 5 falling falling trend higher 54 192.3 (169.4, 217.7) 1.3 -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Tippah County 4 stable stable trend higher 53 195.8 (172.4, 221.6) 1.3 -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Attala County 4 stable stable trend higher 51 195.6 (172.0, 221.9) 1.3 -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
George County 5 falling falling trend higher 51 197.1 (172.8, 224.0) 1.3 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Itawamba County 8 falling falling trend similar 50 159.6 (140.1, 181.2) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Leake County 5 falling falling trend higher 49 177.3 (155.5, 201.4) 1.2 -4.1 (-6.7, -1.4)
Covington County 4 stable stable trend higher 49 207.5 (181.9, 235.8) 1.4 -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Clay County 5 falling falling trend higher 48 175.5 (153.4, 200.2) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Newton County 8 falling falling trend similar 45 168.3 (146.8, 192.3) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Holmes County 4 stable stable trend higher 45 215.1 (187.3, 246.1) 1.4 -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Chickasaw County 4 stable stable trend higher 44 198.0 (172.3, 226.6) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Stone County 5 falling falling trend higher 43 205.5 (178.2, 235.9) 1.4 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Wayne County 8 falling falling trend similar 43 163.2 (141.8, 187.2) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Winston County 8 falling falling trend similar 42 158.4 (137.0, 182.6) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Clarke County 6 stable stable trend similar 41 172.2 (149.0, 198.5) 1.2 -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Jasper County 8 falling falling trend similar 39 162.5 (140.0, 188.1) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Yalobusha County 5 falling falling trend higher 39 207.8 (178.8, 240.8) 1.4 -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Walthall County 6 stable stable trend similar 35 167.1 (142.7, 194.8) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Calhoun County 6 stable stable trend similar 34 172.7 (147.3, 201.7) 1.2 0.1 (-0.8, 0.9)
Lawrence County 4 stable stable trend higher 33 205.2 (174.2, 240.5) 1.4 -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Tallahatchie County 4 stable stable trend higher 33 199.9 (170.1, 233.7) 1.3 -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Smith County 8 falling falling trend similar 33 140.9 (119.6, 165.3) 0.9 -4.9 (-7.5, -2.2)
Amite County 8 falling falling trend similar 32 151.4 (127.7, 179.1) 1.0 -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Jefferson Davis County 5 falling falling trend higher 31 180.4 (151.9, 213.3) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Montgomery County 4 stable stable trend higher 30 191.7 (161.1, 227.2) 1.3 -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Perry County 4 stable stable trend higher 30 181.5 (152.7, 214.7) 1.2 -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Greene County 8 falling falling trend similar 28 176.7 (148.3, 209.3) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Carroll County 6 stable stable trend similar 25 147.8 (122.4, 178.0) 1.0 -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Wilkinson County 4 stable stable trend higher 25 212.0 (175.3, 254.7) 1.4 -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Tunica County 5 falling falling trend higher 23 228.5 (187.4, 276.0) 1.5 -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Claiborne County 4 stable stable trend higher 23 221.1 (181.2, 267.5) 1.5 -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Noxubee County 6 stable stable trend similar 23 179.3 (146.9, 216.9) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Quitman County 5 falling falling trend higher 22 235.4 (192.8, 285.4) 1.6 -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Choctaw County 8 falling falling trend similar 21 165.8 (135.1, 202.6) 1.1 -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Webster County 6 stable stable trend similar 21 163.3 (133.0, 198.9) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Kemper County 6 stable stable trend similar 20 130.2 (104.9, 160.6) 0.9 -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Franklin County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 171.9 (138.5, 211.9) 1.2 -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Humphreys County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 180.1 (145.2, 221.5) 1.2 -3.3 (-5.1, -1.6)
Jefferson County 4 stable stable trend higher 19 206.3 (165.9, 254.2) 1.4 -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Benton County 6 stable stable trend similar 16 137.4 (108.7, 172.2) 0.9 -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Sharkey County 5 falling falling trend higher 14 235.1 (179.5, 303.6) 1.6 -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Issaquena County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/19/2024 7:14 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Issaquena County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top