Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

New Mexico Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by priority index
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 599,666 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) - -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
New Mexico - falling falling trend - 3,623 135.1 (133.1, 137.1) - -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
De Baca County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 147.9 (97.6, 228.0) 1.0 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Guadalupe County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 176.4 (132.6, 232.0) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Hidalgo County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 151.7 (112.9, 202.2) 1.0 -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Luna County 6 stable stable trend similar 58 165.8 (146.4, 187.2) 1.1 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Mora County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 121.3 (85.0, 170.3) 0.8 -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Sierra County 6 stable stable trend similar 46 167.0 (143.4, 195.1) 1.1 -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Union County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 152.7 (111.1, 206.9) 1.0 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Bernalillo County 8 falling falling trend similar 1,123 135.1 (131.5, 138.7) 0.9 -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
Chaves County 8 falling falling trend similar 112 144.0 (132.1, 156.6) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Curry County 8 falling falling trend similar 73 149.1 (134.0, 165.4) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Eddy County 8 falling falling trend similar 102 154.9 (141.6, 169.3) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Grant County 8 falling falling trend similar 74 146.2 (130.4, 163.7) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Lea County 8 falling falling trend similar 102 159.2 (145.4, 173.8) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
McKinley County 8 falling falling trend similar 100 145.4 (132.7, 159.0) 1.0 -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Otero County 8 falling falling trend similar 134 154.5 (142.8, 166.9) 1.0 -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Quay County 8 falling falling trend similar 24 166.5 (136.5, 202.3) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Roosevelt County 8 falling falling trend similar 29 142.5 (120.0, 168.1) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Socorro County 8 falling falling trend similar 32 133.4 (112.8, 157.1) 0.9 -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Torrance County 8 falling falling trend similar 37 164.5 (140.6, 191.9) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Valencia County 8 falling falling trend similar 140 139.2 (128.9, 150.2) 0.9 -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Catron County 9 falling falling trend lower 9 92.3 (66.7, 137.5) 0.6 -2.1 (-3.8, -0.3)
Cibola County 9 falling falling trend lower 42 126.8 (109.9, 145.7) 0.8 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Colfax County 9 falling falling trend lower 29 126.9 (105.8, 152.0) 0.8 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Dona Ana County 9 falling falling trend lower 327 130.4 (124.0, 137.0) 0.9 -1.1 (-1.4, -0.9)
Lincoln County 9 falling falling trend lower 45 114.6 (99.1, 132.5) 0.8 -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Los Alamos County 9 falling falling trend lower 30 114.0 (96.4, 134.2) 0.8 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Rio Arriba County 9 falling falling trend lower 68 121.8 (108.9, 136.0) 0.8 -2.7 (-4.2, -1.2)
San Juan County 9 falling falling trend lower 190 134.5 (125.9, 143.5) 0.9 -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
San Miguel County 9 falling falling trend lower 57 132.9 (117.4, 150.3) 0.9 -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Sandoval County 9 falling falling trend lower 246 131.4 (123.9, 139.2) 0.9 -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Santa Fe County 9 falling falling trend lower 276 114.3 (108.0, 120.9) 0.8 -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Taos County 9 falling falling trend lower 70 119.3 (106.2, 133.9) 0.8 -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Harding County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/06/2024 1:31 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Harding County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top