Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

North Carolina Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by rateratio
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate ascending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 599,666 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) - -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
North Carolina - falling falling trend - 19,723 154.5 (153.5, 155.5) - -2.1 (-2.8, -1.5)
Swain County 4 stable stable trend higher 44 216.3 (188.0, 248.0) 1.4 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Onslow County 5 falling falling trend higher 293 203.9 (193.4, 214.8) 1.4 -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Scotland County 5 falling falling trend higher 93 198.3 (180.2, 217.8) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Vance County 5 falling falling trend higher 119 197.6 (181.6, 214.9) 1.3 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Halifax County 5 falling falling trend higher 150 195.0 (180.8, 210.1) 1.3 -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Robeson County 5 falling falling trend higher 290 188.7 (178.8, 198.9) 1.3 -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Surry County 4 stable stable trend higher 201 184.7 (173.2, 196.8) 1.2 -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
Cleveland County 4 stable stable trend higher 243 183.3 (172.9, 194.2) 1.2 -0.2 (-0.6, 0.1)
Edgecombe County 5 falling falling trend higher 139 182.0 (168.3, 196.6) 1.2 -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Caswell County 5 falling falling trend higher 66 180.3 (160.9, 201.8) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Wayne County 5 falling falling trend higher 277 179.0 (169.6, 188.9) 1.2 -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Richmond County 5 falling falling trend higher 108 178.9 (163.8, 195.1) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
McDowell County 4 stable stable trend higher 121 178.2 (163.9, 193.6) 1.2 -0.2 (-0.6, 0.3)
Sampson County 5 falling falling trend higher 151 178.2 (165.5, 191.7) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Washington County 5 falling falling trend higher 35 178.2 (151.0, 209.7) 1.2 -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Rowan County 5 falling falling trend higher 330 177.1 (168.5, 186.0) 1.2 -3.3 (-5.1, -1.4)
Pasquotank County 5 falling falling trend higher 91 176.8 (160.5, 194.4) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Columbus County 5 falling falling trend higher 144 176.7 (163.8, 190.6) 1.2 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Stokes County 5 falling falling trend higher 125 175.6 (161.7, 190.5) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Randolph County 5 falling falling trend higher 337 175.5 (167.0, 184.3) 1.2 -0.6 (-0.9, -0.4)
Davidson County 5 falling falling trend higher 401 175.5 (167.7, 183.5) 1.2 -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Nash County 5 falling falling trend higher 225 175.5 (165.1, 186.4) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Craven County 5 falling falling trend higher 244 174.6 (164.6, 185.1) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Hyde County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 172.8 (132.8, 223.2) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Bertie County 5 falling falling trend higher 53 172.3 (151.2, 196.0) 1.2 -1.9 (-2.5, -1.4)
Anson County 5 falling falling trend higher 58 171.6 (151.8, 193.5) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Caldwell County 5 falling falling trend higher 205 170.6 (160.0, 181.7) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Cumberland County 5 falling falling trend higher 537 170.5 (164.0, 177.1) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Person County 5 falling falling trend higher 99 170.0 (154.9, 186.3) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Lenoir County 5 falling falling trend higher 141 169.5 (156.9, 183.0) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Alamance County 5 falling falling trend higher 366 169.0 (161.2, 177.1) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Granville County 5 falling falling trend higher 134 168.9 (156.0, 182.6) 1.1 -2.9 (-4.2, -1.6)
Harnett County 5 falling falling trend higher 225 168.9 (159.0, 179.3) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Rockingham County 5 falling falling trend higher 236 168.7 (158.9, 178.9) 1.1 -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Tyrrell County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 168.2 (126.4, 222.3) 1.1 -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Bladen County 5 falling falling trend higher 86 167.9 (151.6, 185.6) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Hoke County 5 falling falling trend higher 75 167.5 (150.1, 186.3) 1.1 -1.9 (-2.6, -1.3)
Yadkin County 5 falling falling trend higher 92 167.2 (152.0, 183.8) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Carteret County 5 falling falling trend higher 202 166.9 (156.3, 178.2) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Mitchell County 8 falling falling trend similar 43 166.6 (143.9, 192.6) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Franklin County 5 falling falling trend higher 144 166.6 (154.3, 179.7) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Rutherford County 4 stable stable trend higher 172 166.4 (155.1, 178.4) 1.1 -0.3 (-2.1, 1.6)
Martin County 8 falling falling trend similar 63 166.2 (147.7, 186.8) 1.1 -2.7 (-3.6, -1.8)
Graham County 8 falling falling trend similar 24 166.1 (136.9, 200.9) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Yancey County 6 stable stable trend similar 54 166.0 (146.2, 188.3) 1.1 0.0 (-0.5, 0.6)
Gaston County 5 falling falling trend higher 458 166.0 (159.1, 173.0) 1.1 -3.6 (-6.0, -1.2)
Davie County 8 falling falling trend similar 108 164.3 (150.4, 179.4) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Lee County 8 falling falling trend similar 128 164.1 (151.4, 177.7) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Wilkes County 8 falling falling trend similar 175 163.9 (152.9, 175.6) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Chowan County 8 falling falling trend similar 39 163.5 (140.1, 190.5) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Greene County 8 falling falling trend similar 44 162.3 (141.0, 186.1) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Burke County 8 falling falling trend similar 220 162.3 (152.6, 172.5) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Jones County 6 stable stable trend similar 25 162.1 (133.7, 195.8) 1.1 11.1 (-17.2, 49.1)
Lincoln County 8 falling falling trend similar 182 161.8 (151.2, 173.0) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Johnston County 8 falling falling trend similar 341 161.0 (153.2, 169.1) 1.1 -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Stanly County 8 falling falling trend similar 139 160.5 (148.6, 173.2) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Beaufort County 8 falling falling trend similar 124 160.4 (147.3, 174.5) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Pender County 8 falling falling trend similar 132 159.4 (147.2, 172.5) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Alexander County 8 falling falling trend similar 86 159.2 (144.2, 175.6) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Dare County 8 falling falling trend similar 90 158.4 (143.4, 174.8) 1.1 -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Catawba County 8 falling falling trend similar 326 156.0 (148.3, 163.9) 1.0 -2.0 (-2.7, -1.4)
Forsyth County 8 falling falling trend similar 718 155.8 (150.7, 161.1) 1.0 -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Iredell County 8 falling falling trend similar 331 154.7 (147.1, 162.5) 1.0 -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Cherokee County 8 falling falling trend similar 86 154.6 (139.2, 171.8) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Montgomery County 8 falling falling trend similar 63 154.0 (136.9, 172.9) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Wilson County 8 falling falling trend similar 170 153.3 (142.9, 164.2) 1.0 -3.1 (-4.8, -1.5)
Ashe County 8 falling falling trend similar 76 153.0 (137.4, 170.4) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Perquimans County 8 falling falling trend similar 39 152.8 (130.9, 178.3) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Warren County 8 falling falling trend similar 53 152.6 (133.7, 173.9) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Gates County 8 falling falling trend similar 25 151.0 (124.8, 181.7) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Macon County 8 falling falling trend similar 102 149.7 (136.2, 164.4) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Haywood County 8 falling falling trend similar 159 148.4 (137.9, 159.7) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Pamlico County 8 falling falling trend similar 37 148.2 (125.6, 175.0) 1.0 -1.9 (-2.5, -1.2)
Guilford County 8 falling falling trend similar 924 148.2 (143.9, 152.7) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Madison County 6 stable stable trend similar 50 147.9 (129.5, 168.6) 1.0 1.0 (-2.0, 4.1)
Buncombe County 8 falling falling trend similar 551 146.3 (140.8, 152.0) 1.0 -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Northampton County 8 falling falling trend similar 50 146.2 (127.1, 167.8) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Pitt County 8 falling falling trend similar 270 146.2 (138.3, 154.4) 1.0 -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Union County 8 falling falling trend similar 345 145.8 (138.8, 153.0) 1.0 -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Cabarrus County 8 falling falling trend similar 319 145.7 (138.5, 153.1) 1.0 -2.3 (-2.8, -1.7)
Brunswick County 8 falling falling trend similar 383 145.4 (138.3, 152.8) 1.0 -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
Jackson County 8 falling falling trend similar 85 144.8 (130.9, 160.0) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Hertford County 8 falling falling trend similar 51 144.3 (126.5, 164.2) 1.0 -3.8 (-5.4, -2.2)
Durham County 8 falling falling trend similar 462 144.2 (138.2, 150.3) 1.0 -2.3 (-2.5, -2.0)
New Hanover County 8 falling falling trend similar 434 144.0 (137.8, 150.3) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
Moore County 8 falling falling trend similar 245 143.8 (135.4, 152.5) 1.0 -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Alleghany County 8 falling falling trend similar 31 142.6 (120.4, 168.9) 1.0 -2.4 (-3.2, -1.5)
Duplin County 8 falling falling trend similar 114 142.2 (130.4, 154.9) 1.0 -2.1 (-2.5, -1.7)
Avery County 8 falling falling trend similar 39 142.1 (122.4, 164.6) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Henderson County 8 falling falling trend similar 296 141.5 (134.0, 149.3) 0.9 -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Currituck County 8 falling falling trend similar 50 140.0 (122.5, 159.5) 0.9 -2.2 (-2.8, -1.6)
Clay County 8 falling falling trend similar 30 135.5 (112.3, 163.3) 0.9 -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Camden County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 135.0 (108.2, 166.8) 0.9 -3.8 (-4.9, -2.6)
Mecklenburg County 9 falling falling trend lower 1,333 134.3 (131.0, 137.6) 0.9 -2.5 (-3.0, -2.0)
Chatham County 9 falling falling trend lower 168 131.8 (122.7, 141.4) 0.9 -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Wake County 9 falling falling trend lower 1,318 130.6 (127.4, 133.9) 0.9 -3.1 (-4.1, -2.2)
Orange County 9 falling falling trend lower 196 129.2 (121.0, 137.7) 0.9 -2.7 (-3.3, -2.1)
Transylvania County 9 falling falling trend lower 91 127.4 (115.0, 141.0) 0.9 -1.9 (-2.4, -1.3)
Polk County 9 falling falling trend lower 55 124.6 (108.9, 142.7) 0.8 -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Watauga County 9 falling falling trend lower 77 119.9 (107.9, 133.0) 0.8 -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/01/2024 9:58 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top