Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

North Dakota Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by priority index
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 599,666 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) - -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
North Dakota - falling falling trend - 1,295 142.0 (138.4, 145.6) - -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Divide County 2 rising rising trend similar 6 148.4 (96.8, 223.7) 1.0 5.5 (0.8, 10.5)
Grand Forks County 5 falling falling trend higher 117 168.1 (154.4, 182.6) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Rolette County 5 falling falling trend higher 27 202.1 (168.7, 240.0) 1.4 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Adams County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 163.7 (110.2, 240.9) 1.1 -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Barnes County 6 stable stable trend similar 28 157.8 (131.6, 188.6) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Benson County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 149.4 (110.6, 197.6) 1.0 0.3 (-1.1, 1.7)
Bottineau County 6 stable stable trend similar 16 146.3 (114.2, 186.2) 1.0 -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Bowman County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 137.8 (95.9, 195.8) 0.9 -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Dickey County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 156.5 (120.4, 202.2) 1.0 -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Dunn County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 119.7 (79.6, 173.4) 0.8 -1.4 (-2.9, 0.0)
Eddy County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 161.7 (110.9, 234.7) 1.1 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Foster County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 128.9 (89.6, 183.6) 0.9 -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Hettinger County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 154.0 (104.7, 223.4) 1.0 -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Logan County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 116.8 (69.7, 192.7) 0.8 -0.9 (-2.4, 0.5)
McHenry County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 161.2 (123.8, 207.7) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.8, 0.3)
Mercer County 6 stable stable trend similar 19 158.2 (126.8, 195.8) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Nelson County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 159.2 (117.3, 218.2) 1.1 -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Renville County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 144.2 (96.5, 213.0) 1.0 -0.1 (-1.7, 1.7)
Sargent County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 141.3 (102.4, 192.9) 0.9 -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Sioux County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 174.3 (112.7, 255.4) 1.2 -1.7 (-4.1, 0.8)
Towner County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 120.6 (78.2, 187.2) 0.8 -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Traill County 6 stable stable trend similar 20 157.7 (126.7, 194.9) 1.1 -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Walsh County 6 stable stable trend similar 28 156.6 (130.7, 186.9) 1.0 1.6 (-1.9, 5.3)
Wells County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 167.7 (125.5, 223.1) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Grant County 7 stable stable trend lower 5 105.0 (67.6, 165.3) 0.7 -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Griggs County 7 stable stable trend lower 5 99.6 (62.1, 161.5) 0.7 -1.1 (-3.0, 0.9)
Burke County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 158.0 (102.6, 237.9) 1.1 -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Cass County 8 falling falling trend similar 238 138.1 (130.1, 146.4) 0.9 -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
Cavalier County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 156.0 (112.9, 213.2) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Kidder County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 116.4 (71.9, 183.3) 0.8 -2.0 (-3.7, -0.3)
McIntosh County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 139.8 (91.6, 210.9) 0.9 -2.3 (-3.7, -1.0)
McLean County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 142.9 (116.1, 175.0) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Morton County 8 falling falling trend similar 62 154.2 (136.9, 173.1) 1.0 -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Mountrail County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 134.5 (102.1, 173.6) 0.9 -1.8 (-3.1, -0.5)
Pembina County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 143.4 (115.1, 178.5) 1.0 -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Pierce County 8 falling falling trend similar 10 120.4 (87.8, 164.8) 0.8 -2.0 (-3.3, -0.8)
Ramsey County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 148.0 (122.9, 177.4) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Ransom County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 138.4 (102.5, 184.5) 0.9 -1.6 (-2.6, -0.7)
Richland County 8 falling falling trend similar 32 141.6 (119.4, 167.1) 0.9 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Stark County 8 falling falling trend similar 47 136.4 (118.8, 155.7) 0.9 -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Stutsman County 8 falling falling trend similar 43 139.4 (120.6, 160.5) 0.9 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Williams County 8 falling falling trend similar 47 162.1 (141.2, 185.1) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Burleigh County 9 falling falling trend lower 156 129.7 (120.5, 139.4) 0.9 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Emmons County 9 falling falling trend lower 8 104.5 (71.6, 153.5) 0.7 -2.3 (-3.3, -1.3)
LaMoure County 9 falling falling trend lower 8 103.7 (68.8, 152.6) 0.7 -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
McKenzie County 9 falling falling trend lower 11 116.4 (87.1, 151.7) 0.8 -2.3 (-3.3, -1.3)
Steele County 9 falling falling trend lower 4 100.0 (59.0, 168.5) 0.7 -2.2 (-3.8, -0.6)
Ward County 9 falling falling trend lower 91 132.0 (119.9, 145.0) 0.9 -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Billings County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Golden Valley County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Oliver County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Sheridan County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Slope County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/06/2024 10:30 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Billings County, Golden Valley County, Oliver County, Sheridan County, Slope County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top