Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Oklahoma Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by priority index
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 599,666 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) - -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Oklahoma - falling falling trend - 8,284 175.2 (173.5, 176.9) - -0.9 (-1.0, -0.8)
Texas County 1 rising rising trend higher 35 190.9 (163.2, 221.9) 1.3 3.7 (1.2, 6.3)
Atoka County 4 stable stable trend higher 37 190.0 (163.2, 220.4) 1.3 0.3 (-0.5, 1.2)
Beckham County 4 stable stable trend higher 48 192.8 (168.9, 219.3) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Blaine County 4 stable stable trend higher 25 185.4 (153.4, 222.7) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Caddo County 4 stable stable trend higher 79 212.9 (192.1, 235.5) 1.4 0.2 (-0.4, 0.7)
Cherokee County 4 stable stable trend higher 112 187.4 (171.8, 204.0) 1.3 -0.3 (-0.7, 0.2)
Choctaw County 4 stable stable trend higher 43 189.8 (164.8, 218.1) 1.3 -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Cotton County 4 stable stable trend higher 17 199.0 (157.6, 249.2) 1.3 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Custer County 4 stable stable trend higher 55 178.9 (157.9, 201.9) 1.2 -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Garvin County 4 stable stable trend higher 80 220.6 (199.0, 244.0) 1.5 0.2 (-0.3, 0.8)
Grant County 4 stable stable trend higher 13 201.5 (153.3, 261.7) 1.3 0.5 (-0.5, 1.5)
Greer County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 201.3 (158.7, 252.8) 1.3 -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Hughes County 4 stable stable trend higher 38 202.1 (174.0, 233.9) 1.4 -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Jackson County 4 stable stable trend higher 51 178.5 (157.0, 202.2) 1.2 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Kay County 4 stable stable trend higher 117 186.9 (171.6, 203.3) 1.3 -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
Kiowa County 4 stable stable trend higher 27 216.9 (180.8, 258.8) 1.5 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Love County 4 stable stable trend higher 31 225.6 (190.7, 265.4) 1.5 0.2 (-0.5, 1.0)
Marshall County 4 stable stable trend higher 46 175.7 (152.9, 201.4) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
McIntosh County 4 stable stable trend higher 66 187.3 (166.8, 210.2) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Nowata County 4 stable stable trend higher 32 209.1 (177.1, 246.0) 1.4 -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Okfuskee County 4 stable stable trend higher 40 247.6 (213.9, 285.5) 1.7 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0)
Okmulgee County 4 stable stable trend higher 104 197.3 (180.3, 215.6) 1.3 -0.4 (-0.7, 0.0)
Pawnee County 4 stable stable trend higher 42 182.6 (158.3, 210.0) 1.2 -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Pushmataha County 4 stable stable trend higher 35 187.1 (159.7, 218.7) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Seminole County 4 stable stable trend higher 66 199.5 (178.1, 223.0) 1.3 -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Washington County 4 stable stable trend higher 142 187.1 (173.1, 202.0) 1.3 -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
Adair County 5 falling falling trend higher 48 179.8 (157.5, 204.5) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Carter County 5 falling falling trend higher 122 194.8 (179.4, 211.3) 1.3 -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Comanche County 5 falling falling trend higher 217 179.3 (168.6, 190.4) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Craig County 5 falling falling trend higher 37 177.1 (152.0, 205.6) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Creek County 5 falling falling trend higher 189 196.4 (183.8, 209.7) 1.3 -0.4 (-0.6, -0.1)
Delaware County 5 falling falling trend higher 121 166.8 (153.0, 181.6) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Garfield County 5 falling falling trend higher 129 168.9 (155.9, 182.8) 1.1 -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Grady County 5 falling falling trend higher 119 171.7 (158.0, 186.5) 1.1 -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Haskell County 5 falling falling trend higher 37 192.7 (165.1, 224.3) 1.3 -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Johnston County 5 falling falling trend higher 29 185.4 (155.7, 219.7) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Le Flore County 5 falling falling trend higher 132 200.5 (185.2, 216.8) 1.3 -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Lincoln County 5 falling falling trend higher 88 182.7 (165.6, 201.1) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Mayes County 5 falling falling trend higher 104 188.8 (172.5, 206.3) 1.3 -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
McClain County 5 falling falling trend higher 85 183.6 (166.2, 202.3) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
McCurtain County 5 falling falling trend higher 87 200.8 (181.9, 221.3) 1.3 -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Murray County 5 falling falling trend higher 41 206.2 (178.1, 238.0) 1.4 -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Muskogee County 5 falling falling trend higher 176 202.4 (189.0, 216.6) 1.4 -0.4 (-0.7, -0.2)
Oklahoma County 5 falling falling trend higher 1,455 172.4 (168.4, 176.5) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.0, -0.8)
Ottawa County 5 falling falling trend higher 90 213.5 (193.9, 234.8) 1.4 -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Payne County 5 falling falling trend higher 127 165.1 (152.3, 178.8) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Pittsburg County 5 falling falling trend higher 123 193.4 (178.0, 209.8) 1.3 -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Pontotoc County 5 falling falling trend higher 83 172.7 (156.2, 190.6) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Pottawatomie County 5 falling falling trend higher 174 193.8 (180.9, 207.4) 1.3 -0.4 (-0.7, -0.1)
Rogers County 5 falling falling trend higher 201 173.6 (162.9, 184.9) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Sequoyah County 5 falling falling trend higher 117 209.0 (192.1, 227.2) 1.4 -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Stephens County 5 falling falling trend higher 115 182.1 (167.0, 198.2) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Tulsa County 5 falling falling trend higher 1,205 165.8 (161.5, 170.1) 1.1 -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
Alfalfa County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 148.3 (114.6, 190.6) 1.0 -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Cimarron County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 117.7 (70.3, 190.7) 0.8 -0.5 (-2.4, 1.5)
Ellis County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 171.5 (126.2, 230.0) 1.1 -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
Harmon County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 203.2 (140.3, 286.8) 1.4 0.2 (-1.6, 2.1)
Harper County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 153.3 (108.3, 212.7) 1.0 -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Jefferson County 6 stable stable trend similar 17 186.2 (146.6, 234.2) 1.2 0.1 (-0.7, 1.0)
Kingfisher County 6 stable stable trend similar 31 159.2 (134.8, 187.0) 1.1 -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Major County 6 stable stable trend similar 19 173.1 (138.5, 214.5) 1.2 1.0 (-0.1, 2.1)
Roger Mills County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 174.0 (128.6, 233.1) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
Tillman County 6 stable stable trend similar 19 182.8 (147.4, 225.1) 1.2 1.8 (-2.2, 5.9)
Washita County 6 stable stable trend similar 26 171.6 (142.3, 205.6) 1.1 -0.1 (-1.0, 0.7)
Woods County 6 stable stable trend similar 19 162.0 (130.3, 199.8) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Beaver County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 122.0 (88.8, 165.1) 0.8 -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
Bryan County 8 falling falling trend similar 100 163.4 (149.2, 178.8) 1.1 -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
Canadian County 8 falling falling trend similar 238 160.8 (151.6, 170.4) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Cleveland County 8 falling falling trend similar 441 150.1 (143.8, 156.6) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.0, -0.5)
Coal County 8 falling falling trend similar 16 177.4 (139.6, 223.9) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Dewey County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 164.1 (124.0, 214.6) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Latimer County 8 falling falling trend similar 30 178.6 (150.2, 211.7) 1.2 -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Logan County 8 falling falling trend similar 90 154.2 (139.9, 169.6) 1.0 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Noble County 8 falling falling trend similar 29 175.0 (147.3, 207.1) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Osage County 8 falling falling trend similar 109 159.0 (145.5, 173.6) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Wagoner County 8 falling falling trend similar 138 139.1 (128.7, 150.1) 0.9 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Woodward County 8 falling falling trend similar 37 151.0 (129.9, 174.8) 1.0 -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/30/2024 2:53 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top