Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Texas Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by trend
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
United States - falling falling trend - 599,666 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) - -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Texas - falling falling trend - 41,072 144.5 (143.9, 145.1) - -1.7 (-1.7, -1.6)
Lampasas County 4 stable stable trend higher 53 173.6 (152.9, 196.7) 1.2 9.0 (-3.4, 22.9)
Smith County 2 rising rising trend similar 417 145.9 (139.6, 152.4) 1.0 5.7 (2.7, 8.7)
Bosque County 4 stable stable trend higher 59 184.3 (162.7, 208.6) 1.2 4.9 (-6.8, 18.1)
Nacogdoches County 6 stable stable trend similar 115 158.0 (145.0, 171.9) 1.1 3.7 (-5.5, 13.7)
Val Verde County 6 stable stable trend similar 77 146.9 (132.5, 162.5) 1.0 2.3 (-3.3, 8.1)
McLennan County 6 stable stable trend similar 439 155.2 (148.7, 162.0) 1.0 0.8 (-2.6, 4.4)
Cherokee County 6 stable stable trend similar 109 159.8 (146.4, 174.1) 1.1 0.7 (-13.7, 17.4)
Schleicher County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 154.6 (103.6, 224.7) 1.0 0.3 (-1.7, 2.2)
Foard County 6 stable stable trend similar 3 189.0 (99.7, 333.0) 1.3 0.2 (-1.8, 2.4)
Yoakum County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 171.4 (132.6, 217.8) 1.1 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
Hamilton County 4 stable stable trend higher 30 216.4 (180.2, 258.6) 1.4 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
Deaf Smith County 6 stable stable trend similar 28 148.9 (124.7, 176.3) 1.0 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Knox County 4 stable stable trend higher 12 216.6 (163.8, 283.1) 1.4 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Trinity County 4 stable stable trend higher 55 205.0 (180.3, 232.9) 1.4 0.0 (-0.8, 0.7)
Starr County 7 stable stable trend lower 76 133.6 (120.5, 147.8) 0.9 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Hall County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 117.5 (79.9, 172.0) 0.8 -9.2 (-15.6, -2.5)
Marion County 6 stable stable trend similar 27 148.0 (122.2, 178.9) 1.0 -8.6 (-17.4, 1.1)
San Jacinto County 8 falling falling trend similar 69 155.4 (138.7, 173.8) 1.0 -5.5 (-8.2, -2.6)
Comanche County 9 falling falling trend lower 30 127.5 (107.0, 151.5) 0.9 -5.1 (-8.2, -2.0)
Kendall County 9 falling falling trend lower 75 118.9 (106.9, 131.9) 0.8 -5.0 (-7.5, -2.4)
Wichita County 5 falling falling trend higher 280 184.5 (174.8, 194.6) 1.2 -3.9 (-6.8, -0.9)
Presidio County 9 falling falling trend lower 8 74.7 (51.9, 105.2) 0.5 -3.6 (-5.0, -2.2)
Shackelford County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 109.5 (72.7, 162.1) 0.7 -2.9 (-4.4, -1.3)
Lipscomb County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 119.8 (77.6, 178.7) 0.8 -2.7 (-4.0, -1.3)
Pecos County 8 falling falling trend similar 21 127.9 (104.3, 155.4) 0.9 -2.7 (-3.8, -1.6)
Upton County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 154.2 (102.9, 222.3) 1.0 -2.4 (-3.6, -1.0)
Hardin County 5 falling falling trend higher 120 164.9 (151.7, 179.0) 1.1 -2.2 (-2.9, -1.6)
Travis County 9 falling falling trend lower 1,205 120.8 (117.6, 124.0) 0.8 -2.2 (-2.3, -2.0)
Dallam County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 141.3 (102.6, 189.5) 0.9 -2.1 (-3.2, -0.8)
Hood County 8 falling falling trend similar 154 148.1 (137.4, 159.7) 1.0 -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Collin County 9 falling falling trend lower 1,045 118.8 (115.5, 122.2) 0.8 -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Denton County 9 falling falling trend lower 885 123.5 (119.7, 127.4) 0.8 -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Harris County 8 falling falling trend similar 5,610 139.4 (137.7, 141.1) 0.9 -2.0 (-2.1, -1.9)
Garza County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 144.1 (104.3, 194.3) 1.0 -1.9 (-3.1, -0.6)
Carson County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 131.2 (98.9, 172.2) 0.9 -1.9 (-2.9, -0.8)
Anderson County 5 falling falling trend higher 154 225.5 (209.6, 242.3) 1.5 -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Montgomery County 8 falling falling trend similar 873 143.4 (139.1, 147.9) 1.0 -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Castro County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 125.5 (93.9, 164.7) 0.8 -1.8 (-2.8, -0.7)
Camp County 8 falling falling trend similar 29 168.5 (141.3, 199.7) 1.1 -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Fort Bend County 9 falling falling trend lower 806 116.3 (112.6, 120.2) 0.8 -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Brazos County 9 falling falling trend lower 209 125.8 (118.1, 133.7) 0.8 -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Dallas County 8 falling falling trend similar 3,387 146.3 (144.0, 148.6) 1.0 -1.8 (-1.9, -1.6)
Nueces County 8 falling falling trend similar 563 138.2 (133.0, 143.5) 0.9 -1.8 (-1.9, -1.6)
Sutton County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 153.7 (109.3, 211.9) 1.0 -1.7 (-3.3, -0.2)
Menard County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 151.4 (101.9, 226.8) 1.0 -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Reeves County 9 falling falling trend lower 18 122.8 (98.5, 151.1) 0.8 -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Walker County 8 falling falling trend similar 105 139.9 (127.9, 152.7) 0.9 -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2)
Brazoria County 8 falling falling trend similar 548 156.6 (150.7, 162.8) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
Williamson County 9 falling falling trend lower 685 128.9 (124.5, 133.3) 0.9 -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
Mason County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 148.1 (109.5, 199.2) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Real County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 172.1 (126.3, 233.6) 1.2 -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Jack County 8 falling falling trend similar 16 142.8 (113.3, 178.2) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Somervell County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 162.1 (131.1, 199.0) 1.1 -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Houston County 8 falling falling trend similar 59 159.2 (141.1, 179.4) 1.1 -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Tyler County 8 falling falling trend similar 51 148.0 (129.8, 168.4) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Burnet County 8 falling falling trend similar 112 148.5 (135.9, 162.0) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Bell County 8 falling falling trend similar 497 161.3 (154.9, 167.9) 1.1 -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Hartley County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 130.9 (94.2, 177.8) 0.9 -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Archer County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 139.2 (112.0, 172.0) 0.9 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Brewster County 9 falling falling trend lower 17 110.4 (87.4, 138.8) 0.7 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Live Oak County 8 falling falling trend similar 25 134.7 (111.3, 162.1) 0.9 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Bandera County 8 falling falling trend similar 62 144.3 (127.5, 163.2) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Fayette County 9 falling falling trend lower 58 122.9 (108.6, 139.0) 0.8 -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Rockwall County 8 falling falling trend similar 138 140.2 (129.6, 151.3) 0.9 -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Waller County 8 falling falling trend similar 76 153.6 (138.2, 170.3) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Jasper County 5 falling falling trend higher 86 170.4 (154.1, 188.0) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Liberty County 5 falling falling trend higher 171 194.5 (181.3, 208.5) 1.3 -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Jefferson County 8 falling falling trend similar 453 154.7 (148.3, 161.3) 1.0 -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Angelina County 8 falling falling trend similar 170 159.6 (148.9, 170.9) 1.1 -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Ellis County 8 falling falling trend similar 289 159.8 (151.5, 168.5) 1.1 -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Tarrant County 8 falling falling trend similar 2,857 149.2 (146.7, 151.7) 1.0 -1.5 (-1.6, -1.5)
Reagan County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 138.6 (87.0, 208.4) 0.9 -1.4 (-3.5, 0.7)
La Salle County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 160.2 (122.1, 206.8) 1.1 -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Goliad County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 161.3 (128.2, 201.3) 1.1 -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3)
Ochiltree County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 135.9 (103.4, 175.1) 0.9 -1.4 (-2.5, -0.4)
Coke County 5 falling falling trend higher 13 203.2 (157.0, 263.5) 1.4 -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Bailey County 8 falling falling trend similar 10 138.2 (102.6, 182.2) 0.9 -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Rains County 8 falling falling trend similar 32 155.9 (131.1, 184.9) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Titus County 8 falling falling trend similar 56 160.1 (141.7, 180.3) 1.1 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Chambers County 8 falling falling trend similar 65 167.0 (148.8, 186.8) 1.1 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Erath County 8 falling falling trend similar 63 141.1 (125.7, 158.0) 0.9 -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Falls County 8 falling falling trend similar 41 171.5 (148.3, 197.6) 1.1 -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Limestone County 8 falling falling trend similar 53 167.6 (147.3, 190.0) 1.1 -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Upshur County 5 falling falling trend higher 99 175.2 (159.7, 192.0) 1.2 -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Burleson County 8 falling falling trend similar 45 157.7 (137.2, 180.9) 1.1 -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Hopkins County 8 falling falling trend similar 81 162.9 (147.1, 180.1) 1.1 -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Guadalupe County 8 falling falling trend similar 258 147.3 (139.3, 155.7) 1.0 -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Hays County 8 falling falling trend similar 263 140.8 (133.0, 148.9) 0.9 -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Washington County 8 falling falling trend similar 78 138.3 (124.3, 153.7) 0.9 -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Kaufman County 5 falling falling trend higher 221 178.4 (167.8, 189.6) 1.2 -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Wharton County 8 falling falling trend similar 89 164.1 (148.9, 180.5) 1.1 -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Galveston County 5 falling falling trend higher 649 171.2 (165.2, 177.3) 1.1 -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Gregg County 5 falling falling trend higher 249 170.9 (161.3, 180.8) 1.1 -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Bexar County 8 falling falling trend similar 2,686 142.0 (139.6, 144.5) 1.0 -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
Jeff Davis County 7 stable stable trend lower 5 89.3 (55.5, 173.3) 0.6 -1.3 (-3.5, 1.1)
Ward County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 146.8 (117.8, 180.9) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Andrews County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 145.7 (119.3, 175.8) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Dimmit County 8 falling falling trend similar 16 128.9 (101.3, 162.0) 0.9 -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Moore County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 133.8 (111.6, 159.0) 0.9 -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Austin County 8 falling falling trend similar 63 147.5 (131.2, 165.6) 1.0 -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Palo Pinto County 5 falling falling trend higher 72 172.8 (154.9, 192.4) 1.2 -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Atascosa County 8 falling falling trend similar 79 140.8 (127.1, 155.6) 0.9 -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Colorado County 8 falling falling trend similar 51 152.3 (133.4, 173.6) 1.0 -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Leon County 5 falling falling trend higher 52 173.4 (151.9, 197.6) 1.2 -1.3 (-1.8, -0.6)
Gillespie County 9 falling falling trend lower 73 131.5 (117.3, 147.4) 0.9 -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Orange County 5 falling falling trend higher 191 184.0 (172.3, 196.2) 1.2 -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Comal County 8 falling falling trend similar 277 139.6 (132.1, 147.4) 0.9 -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Henderson County 5 falling falling trend higher 223 173.1 (162.6, 184.1) 1.2 -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
El Paso County 9 falling falling trend lower 1,070 131.6 (128.0, 135.2) 0.9 -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Collingsworth County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 125.4 (78.8, 191.3) 0.8 -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Scurry County 8 falling falling trend similar 32 161.8 (137.4, 189.4) 1.1 -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
San Augustine County 8 falling falling trend similar 25 163.0 (134.6, 197.1) 1.1 -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Bee County 8 falling falling trend similar 53 162.5 (143.3, 183.6) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Eastland County 8 falling falling trend similar 47 163.6 (142.3, 187.6) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Gonzales County 8 falling falling trend similar 44 165.9 (144.2, 190.0) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Bastrop County 8 falling falling trend similar 162 161.1 (149.8, 173.0) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Howard County 8 falling falling trend similar 58 150.4 (133.3, 169.1) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Harrison County 8 falling falling trend similar 133 153.1 (141.4, 165.5) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Llano County 8 falling falling trend similar 73 147.5 (130.3, 167.0) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Robertson County 5 falling falling trend higher 45 185.5 (161.1, 212.8) 1.2 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Wood County 8 falling falling trend similar 130 162.2 (149.0, 176.5) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Wilson County 8 falling falling trend similar 89 142.9 (129.6, 157.3) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
San Patricio County 5 falling falling trend higher 128 171.0 (157.8, 185.0) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Shelby County 5 falling falling trend higher 60 181.0 (160.8, 203.2) 1.2 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Victoria County 8 falling falling trend similar 171 156.3 (145.8, 167.4) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Medina County 8 falling falling trend similar 88 136.7 (124.0, 150.5) 0.9 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Bowie County 5 falling falling trend higher 207 174.6 (163.9, 185.8) 1.2 -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Midland County 8 falling falling trend similar 216 144.6 (135.8, 153.7) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Rusk County 5 falling falling trend higher 113 166.7 (153.0, 181.3) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Cottle County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 155.8 (93.4, 256.9) 1.0 -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Crane County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 194.1 (139.8, 262.0) 1.3 -1.1 (-2.5, 0.4)
Calhoun County 8 falling falling trend similar 48 166.6 (145.8, 189.7) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Hockley County 8 falling falling trend similar 40 158.0 (136.6, 181.9) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Sabine County 8 falling falling trend similar 37 171.0 (145.2, 201.3) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Caldwell County 5 falling falling trend higher 80 166.3 (150.1, 183.7) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Panola County 5 falling falling trend higher 61 184.0 (163.5, 206.7) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Stephens County 5 falling falling trend higher 26 186.8 (155.3, 223.6) 1.3 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Uvalde County 5 falling falling trend higher 58 175.2 (155.3, 197.2) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Grimes County 8 falling falling trend similar 65 167.3 (149.1, 187.3) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Van Zandt County 5 falling falling trend higher 141 172.3 (159.5, 186.0) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Cameron County 9 falling falling trend lower 509 117.3 (112.8, 122.0) 0.8 -1.1 (-1.4, -0.9)
Potter County 5 falling falling trend higher 217 181.5 (170.7, 192.8) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.4, -0.9)
Ector County 5 falling falling trend higher 226 173.4 (163.2, 184.0) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Parker County 8 falling falling trend similar 269 164.2 (155.3, 173.5) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Tom Green County 8 falling falling trend similar 216 155.7 (146.4, 165.5) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Johnson County 5 falling falling trend higher 322 171.8 (163.3, 180.6) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
Crockett County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 186.3 (132.6, 255.8) 1.2 -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Hardeman County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 151.1 (108.9, 206.3) 1.0 -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Kimble County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 184.1 (141.5, 238.4) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Willacy County 8 falling falling trend similar 29 129.3 (109.0, 152.5) 0.9 -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Morris County 5 falling falling trend higher 37 194.2 (166.2, 226.3) 1.3 -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Madison County 8 falling falling trend similar 29 172.1 (144.7, 203.3) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Gray County 8 falling falling trend similar 42 149.9 (130.1, 172.2) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Fannin County 5 falling falling trend higher 84 169.0 (152.9, 186.4) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Aransas County 5 falling falling trend higher 82 183.1 (164.5, 203.7) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Kerr County 8 falling falling trend similar 152 151.0 (139.7, 163.2) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Hidalgo County 9 falling falling trend lower 841 111.8 (108.5, 115.3) 0.7 -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Lubbock County 8 falling falling trend similar 463 153.7 (147.4, 160.2) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Cochran County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 131.7 (84.0, 198.8) 0.9 -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Zapata County 7 stable stable trend lower 15 109.5 (85.8, 137.6) 0.7 -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Parmer County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 131.9 (102.3, 167.6) 0.9 -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Childress County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 170.5 (131.6, 217.7) 1.1 -0.9 (-2.1, 0.2)
Fisher County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 141.4 (103.4, 192.3) 0.9 -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Hansford County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 163.4 (120.8, 216.6) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Crosby County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 142.2 (106.9, 186.5) 1.0 -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Gaines County 6 stable stable trend similar 23 154.1 (126.7, 185.3) 1.0 -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Runnels County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 163.4 (136.1, 195.4) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Terry County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 137.4 (111.2, 168.1) 0.9 -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Newton County 8 falling falling trend similar 34 166.4 (140.9, 195.6) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Cass County 5 falling falling trend higher 85 174.7 (157.9, 193.0) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Jim Wells County 8 falling falling trend similar 75 160.2 (144.1, 177.6) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Navarro County 5 falling falling trend higher 111 177.8 (163.0, 193.7) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Lamar County 5 falling falling trend higher 126 181.3 (167.1, 196.6) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Brown County 5 falling falling trend higher 93 167.3 (152.2, 183.8) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Grayson County 5 falling falling trend higher 308 173.0 (164.2, 182.1) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Taylor County 5 falling falling trend higher 257 168.0 (158.7, 177.6) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Dickens County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 188.1 (123.9, 277.8) 1.3 -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
Mills County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 169.2 (130.8, 218.3) 1.1 -0.8 (-2.3, 0.6)
Brooks County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 150.7 (116.6, 192.3) 1.0 -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Floyd County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 144.0 (109.3, 187.4) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Zavala County 6 stable stable trend similar 20 162.0 (131.4, 197.8) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Karnes County 6 stable stable trend similar 27 153.7 (128.3, 182.8) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
McCulloch County 4 stable stable trend higher 25 194.4 (160.4, 234.4) 1.3 -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Matagorda County 5 falling falling trend higher 89 189.8 (172.2, 208.8) 1.3 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Cooke County 8 falling falling trend similar 91 163.9 (148.8, 180.2) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Hunt County 5 falling falling trend higher 208 175.1 (164.4, 186.3) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Hutchinson County 5 falling falling trend higher 46 173.2 (150.9, 197.9) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Randall County 8 falling falling trend similar 217 140.0 (131.7, 148.7) 0.9 -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Webb County 9 falling falling trend lower 270 126.0 (119.2, 133.0) 0.8 -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Motley County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 208.6 (120.7, 347.6) 1.4 -0.7 (-2.6, 1.2)
Throckmorton County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 127.4 (77.2, 212.5) 0.9 -0.7 (-2.3, 1.0)
Concho County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 119.5 (78.9, 177.9) 0.8 -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
Jim Hogg County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 186.9 (139.1, 246.2) 1.3 -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
Duval County 6 stable stable trend similar 25 171.3 (142.1, 205.1) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Red River County 6 stable stable trend similar 37 169.1 (144.5, 197.6) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Wilbarger County 8 falling falling trend similar 28 162.2 (135.9, 192.6) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Lavaca County 8 falling falling trend similar 53 156.6 (137.6, 177.9) 1.0 -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Lee County 5 falling falling trend higher 43 180.8 (157.0, 207.6) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Hill County 5 falling falling trend higher 100 187.0 (170.4, 205.0) 1.3 -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Edwards County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 187.9 (121.0, 284.2) 1.3 -0.6 (-2.4, 1.3)
Hemphill County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 148.3 (100.0, 212.3) 1.0 -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Haskell County 6 stable stable trend similar 17 179.3 (142.3, 224.9) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Refugio County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 163.1 (130.7, 202.5) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
San Saba County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 136.6 (105.4, 176.0) 0.9 -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Mitchell County 4 stable stable trend higher 18 199.1 (160.0, 245.0) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Wheeler County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 180.8 (139.5, 231.8) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Franklin County 6 stable stable trend similar 28 177.6 (147.7, 212.3) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Jones County 6 stable stable trend similar 39 165.3 (142.6, 190.8) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Milam County 6 stable stable trend similar 60 160.2 (142.2, 180.2) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Winkler County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 130.3 (96.0, 172.8) 0.9 -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Donley County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 175.3 (124.7, 242.4) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Montague County 4 stable stable trend higher 57 180.3 (159.2, 203.8) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Clay County 6 stable stable trend similar 28 167.0 (139.1, 199.7) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Jackson County 6 stable stable trend similar 35 175.4 (149.9, 204.4) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Callahan County 6 stable stable trend similar 34 164.9 (140.4, 193.1) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Young County 4 stable stable trend higher 51 192.0 (168.4, 218.3) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Coryell County 5 falling falling trend higher 112 184.4 (169.2, 200.6) 1.2 -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Dawson County 6 stable stable trend similar 24 163.7 (135.4, 196.4) 1.1 -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Frio County 6 stable stable trend similar 30 161.2 (136.1, 189.6) 1.1 -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Lamb County 6 stable stable trend similar 25 147.2 (122.1, 176.3) 1.0 -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Swisher County 6 stable stable trend similar 17 168.3 (133.9, 209.8) 1.1 -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Kleberg County 4 stable stable trend higher 56 186.8 (165.2, 210.4) 1.3 -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
DeWitt County 4 stable stable trend higher 59 195.4 (173.2, 220.1) 1.3 -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Wise County 4 stable stable trend higher 144 182.9 (169.4, 197.2) 1.2 -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Baylor County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 254.2 (199.4, 322.6) 1.7 -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Freestone County 4 stable stable trend higher 49 172.3 (151.0, 196.2) 1.2 -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3)
Stonewall County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 190.5 (112.7, 310.2) 1.3 -0.2 (-1.9, 1.5)
Martin County 4 stable stable trend higher 11 208.8 (156.8, 272.3) 1.4 -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Delta County 4 stable stable trend higher 18 225.4 (179.2, 281.3) 1.5 -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Blanco County 6 stable stable trend similar 33 162.5 (137.5, 191.7) 1.1 -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Nolan County 4 stable stable trend higher 40 201.8 (174.3, 232.8) 1.4 -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Hale County 6 stable stable trend similar 58 162.3 (143.9, 182.4) 1.1 -0.2 (-0.8, 0.3)
Polk County 4 stable stable trend higher 148 236.3 (218.2, 255.6) 1.6 -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
Maverick County 6 stable stable trend similar 75 143.6 (129.3, 159.0) 1.0 -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Sherman County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 157.2 (103.6, 229.8) 1.1 -0.1 (-1.9, 1.8)
Kinney County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 160.0 (114.6, 219.6) 1.1 -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Lynn County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 207.4 (163.0, 260.9) 1.4 -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Coleman County 4 stable stable trend higher 29 196.8 (164.4, 235.1) 1.3 -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Armstrong County
**
** similar 5 150.5 (97.1, 231.5) 1.0
**
Briscoe County
**
** similar 5 150.9 (95.4, 239.4) 1.0
**
Hudspeth County
**
** similar 6 112.1 (73.8, 163.7) 0.7
**
Irion County
**
** similar 4 150.3 (87.3, 248.9) 1.0
**
Oldham County
**
** similar 4 184.2 (111.0, 288.9) 1.2
**
Borden County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Culberson County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Glasscock County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Kenedy County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Kent County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
King County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Loving County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
McMullen County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Roberts County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Sterling County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Terrell County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/25/2024 4:08 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Borden County, Culberson County, Glasscock County, Kenedy County, Kent County, King County, Loving County, McMullen County, Roberts County, Sterling County, Terrell County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Armstrong County, Briscoe County, Hudspeth County, Irion County, Oldham County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top