State Cancer Profiles

Interpretation of Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer Data

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2018-2022

Utah Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by priority index

Explanation of Column Headers

State/County - The site and sex combination for this comparison.

Priority Index ¹ - The priority index is based upon the direction of the trend and the rate comparison. An index of 1 is the highest priority - that trend is rising and the rate is already higher. An index of 9 is the lowest priority - the trend is falling and the rate is already lower.

Recent Trends - This is an interpretation of the AAPC:

• Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
• Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
• Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

AAPC (95% Confidence Interval) - The Average Annual Percent Change is the change in rate over time. These AAPCs are based upon APCs that were calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program

Other Notes

• Larger confidence intervals indicate less stability of the data. This is often due to low counts that are not quite low enough to be suppressed.
• Data is currently being suppressed if there are fewer than 16 counts for the time period.

Line by Line Interpretation of the Report

United States

• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is fallingfalling because the trend is -1.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.6 to -1.4.
• Rate : The death rate is 146.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 145.8 to 146.2 and 602,955 average annual deaths.

Utah

• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is fallingfalling because the trend is -1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.1 to -0.9.
• Rate : The death rate is 119.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 118.0 to 121.6 and 3,401 average annual deaths.

Beaver County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stablestable because the trend is -1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.3 to 0.3.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 145.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 105.8 to 193.4 and 10 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.0

Carbon County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stablestable because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -7.3 to 0.0.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 154.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 132.3 to 178.4 and 38 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.1

Duchesne County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stablestable because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.6 to 0.4.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 146.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 122.3 to 173.6 and 27 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.0

Garfield County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stablestable because the trend is -1.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.3 to 0.4.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 116.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 82.0 to 161.8 and 8 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 0.8

Juab County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stablestable because the trend is -0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.8 to 1.2.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 159.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 126.7 to 198.0 and 17 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.1

Kane County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stablestable because the trend is -0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.8 to 0.9.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 168.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 135.3 to 209.1 and 20 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.2

Millard County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stablestable because the trend is -0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.4 to 0.9.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 132.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 108.3 to 161.4 and 22 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 0.9

Morgan County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stablestable because the trend is -1.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.4 to 0.1.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 131.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 101.8 to 165.8 and 14 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 0.9

San Juan County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stablestable because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.4 to 1.0.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 128.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 104.2 to 157.3 and 20 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 0.9

Sevier County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stablestable because the trend is -0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.1 to 0.5.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 148.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 127.8 to 172.3 and 37 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.0

Wayne County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stablestable because the trend is -0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.9 to 2.1.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 161.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 104.6 to 239.9 and 6 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.1

Box Elder County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 7.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stablestable because the trend is -0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.2 to 0.1.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is lower compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 130.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 117.6 to 144.9 and 74 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 0.9

Davis County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 7.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stablestable because the trend is 1.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.0 to 4.7.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is lower compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 119.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 114.0 to 125.4 and 354 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 0.8

Iron County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 7.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stablestable because the trend is -0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.5 to 0.2.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is lower compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 125.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 112.2 to 140.8 and 65 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 0.9

Emery County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 8.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is fallingfalling because the trend is -1.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.6 to -0.2.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 124.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 97.5 to 156.6 and 16 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 0.9

Grand County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 8.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is fallingfalling because the trend is -1.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.6 to -0.7.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 132.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 106.2 to 164.9 and 18 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 0.9

Sanpete County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 8.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is fallingfalling because the trend is -1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.7 to -0.3.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 128.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 110.1 to 148.3 and 37 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 0.9

Tooele County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 8.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is fallingfalling because the trend is -1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.6 to -0.5.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 140.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 126.5 to 156.2 and 76 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.0

Uintah County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 8.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is fallingfalling because the trend is -1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.7 to -0.3.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 134.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 116.5 to 154.3 and 42 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 0.9

Cache County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 9.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is fallingfalling because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.2 to -0.2.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is lower compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 112.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 102.9 to 121.9 and 112 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 0.8

Salt Lake County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 9.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is fallingfalling because the trend is -1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.3 to -0.9.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is lower compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 120.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 117.0 to 123.1 and 1,236 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 0.8

Summit County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 9.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is fallingfalling because the trend is -1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.5 to -0.5.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is lower compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 97.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 83.5 to 112.8 and 41 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 0.7

Utah County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 9.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is fallingfalling because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.9 to -0.5.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is lower compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 114.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 109.5 to 119.0 and 465 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 0.8

Wasatch County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 9.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is fallingfalling because the trend is -1.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.3 to -0.3.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is lower compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 111.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 95.1 to 130.7 and 35 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 0.8

Washington County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 9.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is fallingfalling because the trend is -1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.4 to -0.7.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is lower compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 112.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 106.5 to 118.4 and 307 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 0.8

Weber County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 9.
• Recent Trend(2) : The trend is fallingfalling because the trend is -0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.2 to -0.7.
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is lower compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 122.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 116.0 to 128.8 and 294 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 0.8

Piute County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
• Recent Trend(2) : **
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
• Rate : The death rate is 150.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 91.5 to 247.3 and 5 average annual deaths.
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.0

Daggett County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
• Recent Trend(2) : **
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
• Rate : *
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *

Rich County

• Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
• Recent Trend(2) : **
• County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
• Rate : *
• Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/13/2025 5:14 am.


* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
¹ Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
² Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 5.3.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
³ Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Daggett County, Rich County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Piute County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.