Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

West Virginia Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by count
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 599,666 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) - -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
West Virginia - falling falling trend - 4,665 177.5 (175.2, 179.9) - -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
Kanawha County 5 falling falling trend higher 470 172.5 (165.4, 179.8) 1.2 -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Berkeley County 5 falling falling trend higher 247 185.7 (175.1, 196.8) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Wood County 5 falling falling trend higher 231 183.9 (173.2, 195.1) 1.2 -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Cabell County 5 falling falling trend higher 229 180.2 (169.7, 191.3) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
Raleigh County 5 falling falling trend higher 196 179.2 (167.8, 191.3) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Harrison County 5 falling falling trend higher 179 183.3 (171.2, 196.1) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Mercer County 5 falling falling trend higher 177 195.2 (182.0, 209.3) 1.3 -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Monongalia County 8 falling falling trend similar 145 141.6 (131.2, 152.6) 0.9 -1.6 (-2.0, -1.1)
Marion County 5 falling falling trend higher 138 173.7 (160.7, 187.7) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Fayette County 5 falling falling trend higher 130 196.8 (181.4, 213.2) 1.3 -0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
Jefferson County 5 falling falling trend higher 129 181.9 (167.7, 197.0) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Putnam County 5 falling falling trend higher 126 164.9 (152.0, 178.7) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Ohio County 5 falling falling trend higher 116 176.2 (161.4, 192.2) 1.2 -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Logan County 5 falling falling trend higher 106 218.0 (199.1, 238.3) 1.5 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Wayne County 5 falling falling trend higher 105 172.4 (157.6, 188.3) 1.2 -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Greenbrier County 5 falling falling trend higher 96 166.3 (151.3, 182.7) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Marshall County 5 falling falling trend higher 83 170.4 (153.8, 188.6) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Hancock County 5 falling falling trend higher 82 167.1 (150.8, 185.0) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Preston County 8 falling falling trend similar 80 163.5 (147.4, 181.0) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Jackson County 5 falling falling trend higher 75 167.0 (150.3, 185.4) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Randolph County 8 falling falling trend similar 74 165.0 (148.1, 183.5) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Mason County 5 falling falling trend higher 73 175.8 (157.8, 195.6) 1.2 -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Mineral County 5 falling falling trend higher 71 174.6 (156.4, 194.6) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Mingo County 5 falling falling trend higher 69 208.0 (185.7, 232.4) 1.4 -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Nicholas County 5 falling falling trend higher 67 175.1 (156.1, 196.0) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Boone County 5 falling falling trend higher 65 200.8 (178.8, 225.1) 1.3 -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
McDowell County 5 falling falling trend higher 65 223.3 (198.8, 250.5) 1.5 -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Lincoln County 4 stable stable trend higher 64 222.2 (197.7, 249.1) 1.5 -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Hampshire County 4 stable stable trend higher 64 176.9 (157.1, 198.8) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Upshur County 5 falling falling trend higher 63 174.4 (155.2, 195.7) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Brooke County 8 falling falling trend similar 62 166.3 (147.6, 187.2) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Wyoming County 4 stable stable trend higher 61 198.4 (175.5, 223.7) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Morgan County 4 stable stable trend higher 58 199.2 (175.9, 225.2) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Lewis County 4 stable stable trend higher 55 227.8 (201.1, 257.5) 1.5 -0.2 (-0.7, 0.2)
Roane County 4 stable stable trend higher 47 220.0 (191.7, 251.9) 1.5 -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Taylor County 5 falling falling trend higher 44 174.4 (151.8, 200.0) 1.2 -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Wetzel County 8 falling falling trend similar 44 170.9 (148.4, 196.6) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Barbour County 5 falling falling trend higher 43 184.4 (159.8, 212.1) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Braxton County 8 falling falling trend similar 39 168.5 (145.3, 195.1) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Summers County 5 falling falling trend higher 39 177.0 (151.9, 206.0) 1.2 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Monroe County 6 stable stable trend similar 39 169.6 (145.9, 196.9) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Hardy County 8 falling falling trend similar 31 150.1 (126.6, 177.2) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Webster County 4 stable stable trend higher 27 197.6 (164.1, 237.1) 1.3 0.1 (-0.7, 0.8)
Clay County 5 falling falling trend higher 26 198.6 (164.7, 238.3) 1.3 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Grant County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 128.5 (106.6, 154.5) 0.9 -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Pocahontas County 8 falling falling trend similar 25 171.4 (140.9, 208.0) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Ritchie County 6 stable stable trend similar 25 155.1 (128.2, 187.0) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Tyler County 8 falling falling trend similar 24 162.6 (133.4, 197.3) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Pleasants County 4 stable stable trend higher 22 206.7 (169.2, 251.1) 1.4 -0.1 (-1.2, 0.9)
Tucker County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 176.4 (143.0, 217.1) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Pendleton County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 139.2 (112.5, 172.7) 0.9 -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Gilmer County 6 stable stable trend similar 19 182.5 (147.5, 224.4) 1.2 -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Doddridge County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 145.3 (117.0, 179.5) 1.0 -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Calhoun County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 147.9 (118.6, 184.1) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
Wirt County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 158.0 (120.7, 204.5) 1.1 -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/19/2024 12:22 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top