Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Arkansas Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Male

Sorted by rate
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 315,770 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) - -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Arkansas - falling falling trend - 3,563 206.5 (203.4, 209.6) - -2.5 (-3.0, -1.9)
Chicot County 4 stable stable trend higher 21 301.9 (246.1, 367.8) 1.7 -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Lawrence County 4 stable stable trend higher 32 289.7 (245.8, 340.0) 1.6 -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Monroe County 5 falling falling trend higher 15 286.1 (222.4, 365.2) 1.6 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Poinsett County 5 falling falling trend higher 39 280.3 (240.8, 324.7) 1.6 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Mississippi County 5 falling falling trend higher 59 274.4 (242.6, 309.3) 1.5 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Clay County 4 stable stable trend higher 29 274.0 (230.3, 324.4) 1.5 -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Crittenden County 5 falling falling trend higher 61 271.7 (240.5, 305.7) 1.5 -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Calhoun County 4 stable stable trend higher 11 270.8 (200.8, 361.3) 1.5 -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Jackson County 4 stable stable trend higher 26 263.3 (218.9, 314.3) 1.5 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Arkansas County 5 falling falling trend higher 30 262.2 (220.6, 309.9) 1.5 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Ashley County 5 falling falling trend higher 36 261.8 (223.9, 304.9) 1.5 -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Ouachita County 5 falling falling trend higher 40 261.5 (225.5, 302.1) 1.5 -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Dallas County 5 falling falling trend higher 14 260.1 (200.0, 334.9) 1.5 -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Woodruff County 4 stable stable trend higher 12 257.7 (194.2, 337.9) 1.5 -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Randolph County 4 stable stable trend higher 29 255.6 (214.8, 302.4) 1.4 -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Drew County 4 stable stable trend higher 27 254.1 (211.6, 302.8) 1.4 -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Phillips County 5 falling falling trend higher 27 250.7 (209.0, 298.8) 1.4 -2.1 (-2.8, -1.4)
Union County 5 falling falling trend higher 60 250.2 (221.8, 281.4) 1.4 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Greene County 4 stable stable trend higher 60 248.5 (220.6, 279.1) 1.4 -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Stone County 4 stable stable trend higher 28 241.5 (202.1, 288.4) 1.4 -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Scott County 4 stable stable trend higher 18 240.8 (192.7, 298.7) 1.4 -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Polk County 5 falling falling trend higher 37 239.4 (205.4, 278.4) 1.3 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Cross County 4 stable stable trend higher 24 237.8 (196.2, 286.1) 1.3 -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Lee County 5 falling falling trend higher 14 237.7 (185.1, 301.6) 1.3 -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Lonoke County 5 falling falling trend higher 81 236.9 (213.5, 262.2) 1.3 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Pike County 4 stable stable trend higher 17 234.4 (186.8, 291.7) 1.3 -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Franklin County 5 falling falling trend higher 28 233.9 (196.3, 277.4) 1.3 -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Columbia County 5 falling falling trend higher 31 233.4 (197.1, 274.8) 1.3 -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Jefferson County 5 falling falling trend higher 92 232.0 (210.5, 255.2) 1.3 -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Lincoln County 4 stable stable trend higher 18 230.5 (183.9, 285.6) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Cleveland County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 228.2 (175.0, 294.5) 1.3 -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
Sharp County 4 stable stable trend higher 35 227.6 (194.4, 266.2) 1.3 -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Nevada County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 227.2 (174.1, 293.1) 1.3 -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Lafayette County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 224.1 (169.4, 294.3) 1.3 -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Miller County 5 falling falling trend higher 53 220.1 (193.8, 249.0) 1.2 -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Crawford County 5 falling falling trend higher 79 216.6 (195.2, 239.8) 1.2 -1.6 (-2.0, -1.1)
Logan County 5 falling falling trend higher 32 214.1 (181.6, 251.4) 1.2 -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Clark County 8 falling falling trend similar 25 213.6 (177.2, 255.6) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Montgomery County 6 stable stable trend similar 17 210.4 (164.8, 267.6) 1.2 -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Conway County 8 falling falling trend similar 30 210.1 (177.0, 248.2) 1.2 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Marion County 8 falling falling trend similar 32 210.0 (175.2, 251.3) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Baxter County 5 falling falling trend higher 85 209.4 (188.4, 232.7) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Fulton County 6 stable stable trend similar 22 208.2 (169.4, 254.9) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Johnson County 8 falling falling trend similar 32 206.8 (175.1, 242.7) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Yell County 8 falling falling trend similar 27 206.8 (173.0, 245.5) 1.2 -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Prairie County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 205.5 (157.2, 266.4) 1.2 -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Grant County 6 stable stable trend similar 24 204.9 (168.8, 247.0) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
Howard County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 203.9 (162.2, 253.9) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Madison County 8 falling falling trend similar 21 203.3 (164.8, 248.6) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Desha County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 203.1 (158.1, 258.2) 1.1 -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Pope County 5 falling falling trend higher 71 201.8 (181.0, 224.5) 1.1 -3.0 (-5.0, -1.1)
Perry County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 201.3 (156.8, 256.0) 1.1 -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Hot Spring County 8 falling falling trend similar 45 201.3 (175.3, 230.3) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Searcy County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 200.2 (155.0, 257.6) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Sevier County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 199.8 (159.6, 247.1) 1.1 -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
White County 5 falling falling trend higher 86 199.7 (180.9, 220.0) 1.1 -1.6 (-2.1, -1.2)
Boone County 8 falling falling trend similar 50 198.1 (173.8, 225.1) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Craighead County 5 falling falling trend higher 98 197.2 (179.8, 215.8) 1.1 -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Bradley County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 196.3 (150.9, 251.9) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Sebastian County 8 falling falling trend similar 134 193.6 (178.8, 209.3) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Pulaski County 8 falling falling trend similar 382 193.1 (184.3, 202.3) 1.1 -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Garland County 8 falling falling trend similar 145 193.1 (178.9, 208.3) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Izard County 8 falling falling trend similar 23 191.1 (156.9, 232.1) 1.1 -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Carroll County 8 falling falling trend similar 41 189.8 (163.8, 219.3) 1.1 -1.7 (-2.5, -1.0)
Cleburne County 8 falling falling trend similar 44 189.3 (164.5, 217.9) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Van Buren County 8 falling falling trend similar 27 185.4 (154.6, 222.0) 1.0 -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
St. Francis County 8 falling falling trend similar 28 185.1 (154.7, 219.8) 1.0 -2.4 (-3.1, -1.7)
Saline County 8 falling falling trend similar 133 184.8 (170.7, 199.9) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Faulkner County 8 falling falling trend similar 101 181.9 (165.8, 199.1) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Independence County 8 falling falling trend similar 40 181.3 (156.6, 209.0) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Benton County 8 falling falling trend similar 225 178.2 (167.8, 189.0) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.4, -0.9)
Washington County 8 falling falling trend similar 171 177.8 (165.8, 190.5) 1.0 -2.3 (-2.9, -1.7)
Hempstead County 8 falling falling trend similar 24 174.5 (144.0, 210.1) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Little River County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 164.4 (127.1, 210.4) 0.9 -2.7 (-3.7, -1.7)
Newton County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 160.7 (119.7, 214.7) 0.9 -1.9 (-2.9, -1.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/05/2024 7:24 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top