Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

California Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Male

Sorted by count
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 315,770 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) - -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
California - falling falling trend - 30,954 158.3 (157.5, 159.1) - -2.2 (-2.7, -1.6)
Los Angeles County 9 falling falling trend lower 7,433 156.8 (155.2, 158.4) 0.9 -1.7 (-1.8, -1.6)
San Diego County 8 falling falling trend similar 2,631 161.8 (159.0, 164.6) 0.9 -2.4 (-2.9, -1.8)
Orange County 9 falling falling trend lower 2,419 148.6 (145.9, 151.3) 0.8 -1.8 (-1.9, -1.7)
Riverside County 8 falling falling trend similar 2,018 161.1 (157.9, 164.3) 0.9 -1.5 (-1.6, -1.3)
San Bernardino County 8 falling falling trend similar 1,564 175.5 (171.5, 179.6) 1.0 -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
Sacramento County 8 falling falling trend similar 1,301 177.4 (173.0, 181.9) 1.0 -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
Santa Clara County 9 falling falling trend lower 1,231 131.1 (127.8, 134.4) 0.7 -3.3 (-4.5, -2.0)
Alameda County 9 falling falling trend lower 1,137 143.5 (139.7, 147.4) 0.8 -2.3 (-2.5, -2.2)
Contra Costa County 9 falling falling trend lower 926 151.4 (147.0, 155.9) 0.9 -1.9 (-2.1, -1.8)
San Francisco County 9 falling falling trend lower 713 144.8 (140.0, 149.7) 0.8 -2.2 (-2.4, -2.1)
Fresno County 8 falling falling trend similar 706 165.4 (159.8, 171.0) 0.9 -1.5 (-1.7, -1.4)
Ventura County 9 falling falling trend lower 690 151.6 (146.5, 156.8) 0.9 -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
Kern County 8 falling falling trend similar 621 172.6 (166.3, 179.0) 1.0 -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
San Joaquin County 8 falling falling trend similar 611 183.2 (176.6, 190.0) 1.0 -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
San Mateo County 9 falling falling trend lower 566 134.0 (129.0, 139.1) 0.8 -2.8 (-3.1, -2.4)
Sonoma County 9 falling falling trend lower 485 156.8 (150.5, 163.4) 0.9 -2.5 (-3.1, -1.9)
Stanislaus County 8 falling falling trend similar 462 187.2 (179.4, 195.1) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Solano County 5 falling falling trend higher 457 196.1 (187.9, 204.6) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Placer County 9 falling falling trend lower 395 155.5 (148.6, 162.6) 0.9 -1.9 (-2.1, -1.6)
Santa Barbara County 9 falling falling trend lower 354 148.9 (142.0, 156.1) 0.8 -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Tulare County 8 falling falling trend similar 318 167.4 (159.0, 176.0) 0.9 -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
San Luis Obispo County 9 falling falling trend lower 298 158.7 (150.5, 167.2) 0.9 -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Monterey County 9 falling falling trend lower 291 139.4 (132.2, 146.9) 0.8 -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Butte County 8 falling falling trend similar 258 194.1 (183.4, 205.3) 1.1 -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Shasta County 5 falling falling trend higher 246 201.8 (190.4, 213.8) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.4, -0.9)
Marin County 9 falling falling trend lower 244 129.4 (122.2, 137.1) 0.7 -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Santa Cruz County 9 falling falling trend lower 217 149.0 (139.8, 158.6) 0.8 -1.8 (-2.2, -1.5)
Merced County 8 falling falling trend similar 197 179.1 (167.8, 190.9) 1.0 -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
El Dorado County 9 falling falling trend lower 197 142.8 (133.7, 152.4) 0.8 -1.9 (-2.2, -1.5)
Humboldt County 5 falling falling trend higher 160 200.0 (185.8, 214.9) 1.1 -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Napa County 8 falling falling trend similar 149 163.3 (151.6, 175.7) 0.9 -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Yolo County 9 falling falling trend lower 146 156.5 (145.2, 168.5) 0.9 -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Madera County 8 falling falling trend similar 132 172.5 (159.3, 186.4) 1.0 -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Nevada County 9 falling falling trend lower 130 150.7 (138.8, 163.6) 0.8 -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Imperial County 9 falling falling trend lower 128 153.1 (141.3, 165.6) 0.9 -2.0 (-2.5, -1.6)
Mendocino County 8 falling falling trend similar 112 182.9 (167.3, 199.6) 1.0 -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
Kings County 8 falling falling trend similar 102 171.9 (156.9, 187.9) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Lake County 5 falling falling trend higher 102 206.2 (187.9, 226.1) 1.2 -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Sutter County 8 falling falling trend similar 94 177.7 (161.8, 194.8) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2)
Tehama County 8 falling falling trend similar 82 190.8 (172.4, 210.7) 1.1 -1.7 (-2.2, -1.3)
Yuba County 5 falling falling trend higher 78 218.1 (196.2, 241.7) 1.2 -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Tuolumne County 8 falling falling trend similar 75 161.7 (145.1, 180.0) 0.9 -2.3 (-3.0, -1.6)
Siskiyou County 5 falling falling trend higher 75 213.0 (190.8, 237.4) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Calaveras County 8 falling falling trend similar 71 166.5 (148.9, 186.3) 0.9 -1.8 (-2.4, -1.3)
Amador County 8 falling falling trend similar 61 169.0 (150.1, 190.1) 1.0 -1.9 (-2.4, -1.3)
San Benito County 9 falling falling trend lower 40 142.0 (122.2, 163.9) 0.8 -2.1 (-2.9, -1.4)
Del Norte County 8 falling falling trend similar 34 197.4 (168.0, 230.7) 1.1 -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Glenn County 8 falling falling trend similar 30 194.3 (164.0, 228.6) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Plumas County 8 falling falling trend similar 30 170.8 (142.5, 204.4) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Lassen County 8 falling falling trend similar 27 160.3 (133.6, 190.7) 0.9 -2.2 (-2.9, -1.4)
Inyo County 8 falling falling trend similar 25 177.5 (146.3, 214.2) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Mariposa County 8 falling falling trend similar 25 162.7 (132.8, 198.7) 0.9 -1.7 (-2.7, -0.8)
Trinity County 9 falling falling trend lower 17 135.0 (106.6, 171.1) 0.8 -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Colusa County 9 falling falling trend lower 17 144.1 (114.2, 179.6) 0.8 -2.4 (-3.5, -1.4)
Modoc County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 146.3 (108.2, 196.2) 0.8 -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Mono County 9 falling falling trend lower 6 54.2 (35.4, 80.8) 0.3 -2.8 (-5.0, -0.6)
Sierra County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 123.3 (72.3, 213.2) 0.7 -1.2 (-3.1, 0.8)
Alpine County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/27/2024 4:59 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Alpine County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top