Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer
Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2018-2022
Colorado Counties versus United States
All Cancer Sites
All Races, Male
Sorted by priority index
Counties
|
Priority Index1 1=highest 9=lowest 
|
Recent Trend2 |
County Death Rate Compared to US Rate |
Average Annual Count
|
Age-Adjusted Death Rate deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Rate Ratio3 County to US
|
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | - | fallingfalling | - | 317,428 | 173.2 (173.0, 173.5) | - | -1.8 (-1.8, -1.8) |
| Colorado | - | fallingfalling | - | 4,247 | 150.3 (148.2, 152.4) | - | -1.6 (-1.7, -1.5) |
| Pueblo County | 5 | fallingfalling | higher | 201 | 195.1 (182.9, 208.0) | 1.1 | -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4) |
| Alamosa County | 6 | stablestable | similar | 14 | 175.4 (135.1, 223.9) | 1.0 | -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0) |
| Baca County | 6 | stablestable | similar | 7 | 244.2 (171.4, 345.0) | 1.4 | -0.6 (-2.4, 1.1) |
| Bent County | 6 | stablestable | similar | 6 | 141.6 (95.7, 205.4) | 0.8 | -0.6 (-2.2, 1.2) |
| Conejos County | 6 | stablestable | similar | 9 | 169.0 (121.5, 230.7) | 1.0 | -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5) |
| Delta County | 6 | stablestable | similar | 51 | 191.0 (166.9, 218.1) | 1.1 | -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3) |
| Huerfano County | 6 | stablestable | similar | 15 | 216.7 (166.9, 281.9) | 1.3 | -0.7 (-2.0, 0.8) |
| Lincoln County | 6 | stablestable | similar | 8 | 210.3 (148.1, 291.1) | 1.2 | -0.2 (-1.9, 1.8) |
| Logan County | 6 | stablestable | similar | 22 | 167.9 (137.3, 203.5) | 1.0 | -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3) |
| Moffat County | 6 | stablestable | similar | 15 | 196.1 (151.4, 249.9) | 1.1 | -1.0 (-2.4, 0.7) |
| Morgan County | 6 | stablestable | similar | 28 | 169.4 (142.0, 200.8) | 1.0 | -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2) |
| Otero County | 6 | stablestable | similar | 25 | 207.0 (171.2, 248.7) | 1.2 | -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2) |
| Phillips County | 6 | stablestable | similar | 5 | 156.1 (99.7, 236.8) | 0.9 | -1.3 (-3.4, 0.7) |
| Prowers County | 6 | stablestable | similar | 15 | 206.4 (161.8, 260.2) | 1.2 | -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0) |
| Rio Grande County | 6 | stablestable | similar | 15 | 193.2 (151.2, 244.3) | 1.1 | -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5) |
| Sedgwick County | 6 | stablestable | similar | 4 | 167.2 (95.2, 287.7) | 1.0 | -1.5 (-4.3, 1.0) |
| Washington County | 6 | stablestable | similar | 7 | 174.9 (119.7, 250.6) | 1.0 | -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6) |
| Yuma County | 6 | stablestable | similar | 10 | 161.5 (119.5, 214.3) | 0.9 | -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6) |
| Archuleta County | 7 | stablestable | lower | 15 | 134.3 (102.1, 175.0) | 0.8 | -0.8 (-2.3, 1.2) |
| Boulder County 8 | 7 | stablestable | lower | 210 | 130.8 (122.7, 139.2) | 0.8 | -0.9 (-2.0, 2.5) |
| Chaffee County | 7 | stablestable | lower | 21 | 136.2 (110.7, 166.9) | 0.8 | -1.1 (-2.2, 0.2) |
| Douglas County | 7 | stablestable | lower | 204 | 133.2 (124.7, 142.1) | 0.8 | 1.3 (-2.2, 7.2) |
| Grand County | 7 | stablestable | lower | 12 | 114.2 (83.9, 152.4) | 0.7 | -1.3 (-3.0, 1.0) |
| Park County | 7 | stablestable | lower | 17 | 121.7 (91.9, 158.7) | 0.7 | 6.1 (-5.5, 25.4) |
| Adams County 8 | 8 | fallingfalling | similar | 319 | 163.5 (155.1, 172.3) | 0.9 | -2.2 (-2.7, -1.7) |
| El Paso County | 8 | fallingfalling | similar | 521 | 161.5 (155.1, 168.1) | 0.9 | -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2) |
| Fremont County | 8 | fallingfalling | similar | 63 | 168.6 (150.1, 189.1) | 1.0 | -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3) |
| Las Animas County | 8 | fallingfalling | similar | 21 | 180.5 (145.6, 222.4) | 1.0 | -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1) |
| Mesa County | 8 | fallingfalling | similar | 162 | 159.7 (148.6, 171.5) | 0.9 | -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3) |
| Montezuma County | 8 | fallingfalling | similar | 33 | 176.1 (149.2, 207.0) | 1.0 | -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7) |
| Arapahoe County | 9 | fallingfalling | lower | 423 | 146.0 (139.5, 152.6) | 0.8 | -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2) |
| Broomfield County 8 | 9 | fallingfalling | lower | 45 | 131.3 (114.3, 150.0) | 0.8 | -2.8 (-4.2, -1.2) |
| Clear Creek County | 9 | fallingfalling | lower | 6 | 70.4 (44.3, 109.0) | 0.4 | -14.4 (-46.0, -2.6) |
| Denver County | 9 | fallingfalling | lower | 444 | 155.8 (149.2, 162.7) | 0.9 | -4.0 (-6.8, -2.1) |
| Eagle County | 9 | fallingfalling | lower | 20 | 76.5 (60.5, 95.1) | 0.4 | -3.4 (-4.7, -1.4) |
| Elbert County | 9 | fallingfalling | lower | 20 | 127.6 (101.7, 158.3) | 0.7 | -1.6 (-2.7, -0.2) |
| Garfield County | 9 | fallingfalling | lower | 41 | 147.6 (126.6, 170.8) | 0.9 | -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3) |
| Gunnison County | 9 | fallingfalling | lower | 9 | 106.4 (74.9, 146.2) | 0.6 | -3.1 (-4.5, -1.5) |
| Jefferson County 8 | 9 | fallingfalling | lower | 474 | 148.1 (142.0, 154.5) | 0.9 | -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1) |
| Kit Carson County | 9 | fallingfalling | lower | 6 | 126.1 (85.8, 181.2) | 0.7 | -2.6 (-3.9, -1.4) |
| La Plata County | 9 | fallingfalling | lower | 46 | 136.8 (118.7, 157.1) | 0.8 | -1.9 (-2.5, -1.1) |
| Lake County | 9 | fallingfalling | lower | 4 | 102.6 (56.8, 168.5) | 0.6 | -3.2 (-5.0, -1.6) |
| Larimer County | 9 | fallingfalling | lower | 272 | 145.9 (138.0, 154.2) | 0.8 | -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2) |
| Montrose County | 9 | fallingfalling | lower | 50 | 148.6 (130.1, 169.3) | 0.9 | -1.5 (-2.2, -0.6) |
| Pitkin County | 9 | fallingfalling | lower | 10 | 71.5 (51.9, 97.4) | 0.4 | -2.4 (-4.0, -0.2) |
| Routt County | 9 | fallingfalling | lower | 15 | 102.5 (78.9, 131.3) | 0.6 | -2.7 (-3.8, -1.3) |
| Teller County | 9 | fallingfalling | lower | 26 | 133.7 (108.3, 164.0) | 0.8 | -2.6 (-3.7, -1.2) |
| Weld County 8 | 9 | fallingfalling | lower | 219 | 152.7 (143.4, 162.5) | 0.9 | -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7) |
| Cheyenne County |
|
** | similar | 4 | 264.9 (153.2, 438.8) | 1.5 |
|
| Crowley County |
|
** | lower | 4 | 107.6 (62.5, 176.1) | 0.6 |
|
| Custer County |
|
** | lower | 5 | 105.3 (60.3, 179.6) | 0.6 |
|
| Gilpin County |
|
** | similar | 4 | 124.5 (67.4, 211.1) | 0.7 |
|
| Ouray County |
|
** | similar | 5 | 121.6 (74.3, 195.9) | 0.7 |
|
| Rio Blanco County |
|
** | similar | 7 | 178.8 (123.3, 251.9) | 1.0 |
|
| Saguache County |
|
** | similar | 9 | 177.4 (124.9, 247.8) | 1.0 |
|
| San Miguel County |
|
** | similar | 5 | 139.4 (85.3, 213.6) | 0.8 |
|
| Summit County |
|
** | lower | 11 | 72.7 (51.5, 99.1) | 0.4 |
|
| Costilla County |
|
** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Dolores County |
|
** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hinsdale County |
|
** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jackson County |
|
** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Kiowa County |
|
** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mineral County |
|
** |
|
|
|
|
|
| San Juan County |
|
** |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/15/2025 6:39 pm.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 5.3.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).
8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected geographic areas.
Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Costilla County, Dolores County, Hinsdale County, Jackson County, Kiowa County, Mineral County, San Juan County
Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Cheyenne County, Crowley County, Custer County, Gilpin County, Ouray County, Rio Blanco County, Saguache County, San Miguel County, Summit County
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/15/2025 6:39 pm.
Trend2
Rising
when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable
when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling
when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
Above when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
Similar
when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
Below when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90
Rising
when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.Stable
when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.Falling
when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.Rate Comparison
Above
when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10Similar
when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.Below
when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 5.3.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).
8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected geographic areas.
Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Costilla County, Dolores County, Hinsdale County, Jackson County, Kiowa County, Mineral County, San Juan County
Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Cheyenne County, Crowley County, Custer County, Gilpin County, Ouray County, Rio Blanco County, Saguache County, San Miguel County, Summit County
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.