Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Illinois Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Male

Sorted by trend
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
United States - falling falling trend - 315,770 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) - -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Illinois - falling falling trend - 12,356 183.3 (181.9, 184.8) - -1.9 (-2.0, -1.8)
Ford County 4 stable stable trend higher 25 295.4 (244.1, 355.0) 1.7 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Cook County 8 falling falling trend similar 4,480 177.7 (175.3, 180.1) 1.0 -3.1 (-4.0, -2.2)
Hardin County 4 stable stable trend higher 9 260.9 (184.6, 365.0) 1.5 -25.3 (-51.2, 14.5)
McDonough County 8 falling falling trend similar 31 182.9 (154.3, 215.6) 1.0 -2.8 (-4.5, -1.1)
Monroe County 9 falling falling trend lower 29 131.9 (110.7, 156.3) 0.7 -2.5 (-3.0, -1.9)
Henderson County 9 falling falling trend lower 8 129.8 (93.0, 181.6) 0.7 -2.4 (-3.8, -1.1)
St. Clair County 5 falling falling trend higher 276 199.3 (188.5, 210.4) 1.1 -2.4 (-2.9, -1.9)
McHenry County 8 falling falling trend similar 282 181.8 (172.0, 192.1) 1.0 -2.3 (-2.8, -1.9)
Adams County 8 falling falling trend similar 84 180.0 (162.8, 198.8) 1.0 -2.3 (-2.7, -1.9)
Gallatin County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 235.5 (166.9, 326.3) 1.3 -2.2 (-3.3, -1.2)
Hancock County 8 falling falling trend similar 23 165.9 (135.5, 202.0) 0.9 -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
Champaign County 8 falling falling trend similar 147 161.0 (149.3, 173.4) 0.9 -2.1 (-2.5, -1.6)
DuPage County 9 falling falling trend lower 738 153.9 (148.9, 159.2) 0.9 -2.1 (-2.3, -1.9)
Putnam County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 164.5 (116.1, 230.9) 0.9 -2.0 (-3.6, -0.3)
Boone County 8 falling falling trend similar 50 167.1 (146.4, 189.9) 0.9 -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Lake County 8 falling falling trend similar 576 165.9 (159.7, 172.3) 0.9 -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Wayne County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 163.6 (132.5, 200.8) 0.9 -1.8 (-2.8, -0.9)
De Witt County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 192.1 (155.3, 235.8) 1.1 -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Kane County 8 falling falling trend similar 408 162.2 (155.0, 169.7) 0.9 -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
Kankakee County 5 falling falling trend higher 132 202.8 (187.4, 219.3) 1.1 -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Piatt County 8 falling falling trend similar 21 187.8 (152.8, 229.1) 1.1 -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Clinton County 8 falling falling trend similar 37 164.1 (141.0, 190.1) 0.9 -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Massac County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 203.7 (165.1, 249.8) 1.1 -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Wabash County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 182.3 (142.5, 231.0) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Carroll County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 183.6 (149.0, 225.1) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Montgomery County 5 falling falling trend higher 46 236.1 (206.1, 269.6) 1.3 -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
McLean County 8 falling falling trend similar 135 174.6 (161.3, 188.6) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Jasper County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 162.5 (122.6, 213.0) 0.9 -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Jersey County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 175.8 (146.5, 210.0) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Menard County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 185.9 (144.8, 236.1) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Franklin County 5 falling falling trend higher 58 220.6 (195.6, 248.3) 1.2 -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Ogle County 8 falling falling trend similar 64 189.2 (168.5, 211.9) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Rock Island County 8 falling falling trend similar 176 193.1 (180.3, 206.7) 1.1 -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Will County 8 falling falling trend similar 589 189.9 (182.8, 197.2) 1.1 -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Cumberland County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 179.6 (137.6, 231.5) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Johnson County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 189.7 (151.8, 235.3) 1.1 -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Perry County 8 falling falling trend similar 24 179.1 (148.1, 215.0) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Henry County 8 falling falling trend similar 60 175.7 (156.1, 197.5) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Jackson County 8 falling falling trend similar 51 175.0 (153.5, 198.6) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Douglas County 8 falling falling trend similar 24 196.7 (162.2, 236.7) 1.1 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Grundy County 5 falling falling trend higher 53 216.9 (190.3, 245.9) 1.2 -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Williamson County 5 falling falling trend higher 94 220.1 (200.4, 241.5) 1.2 -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
Peoria County 5 falling falling trend higher 210 206.7 (194.2, 220.0) 1.2 -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Schuyler County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 196.7 (147.1, 260.5) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.7, 0.0)
Bond County 6 stable stable trend similar 20 190.0 (154.0, 232.5) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Edgar County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 206.8 (172.0, 247.5) 1.2 -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Washington County 8 falling falling trend similar 16 154.3 (121.0, 195.1) 0.9 -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Coles County 8 falling falling trend similar 47 164.8 (144.1, 187.9) 0.9 -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Fayette County 8 falling falling trend similar 29 200.6 (169.0, 237.0) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Saline County 5 falling falling trend higher 37 240.7 (206.4, 279.4) 1.4 -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Kendall County 8 falling falling trend similar 82 181.5 (163.3, 200.9) 1.0 -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Winnebago County 5 falling falling trend higher 332 197.6 (188.0, 207.6) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Sangamon County 8 falling falling trend similar 217 193.5 (181.9, 205.8) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Madison County 5 falling falling trend higher 311 201.9 (191.7, 212.4) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Edwards County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 161.1 (111.9, 227.2) 0.9 -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4)
Pulaski County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 218.4 (158.2, 298.1) 1.2 -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
White County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 219.4 (178.9, 267.4) 1.2 -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Greene County 8 falling falling trend similar 16 184.4 (146.0, 230.7) 1.0 -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Warren County 5 falling falling trend higher 25 221.5 (183.0, 266.2) 1.2 -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Knox County 5 falling falling trend higher 72 205.3 (184.2, 228.4) 1.2 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Livingston County 8 falling falling trend similar 47 202.4 (176.8, 230.8) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Randolph County 8 falling falling trend similar 42 201.9 (175.1, 231.8) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Stephenson County 5 falling falling trend higher 66 199.8 (178.1, 223.7) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Lee County 5 falling falling trend higher 52 216.7 (190.8, 245.5) 1.2 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
DeKalb County 8 falling falling trend similar 88 192.9 (174.8, 212.4) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Macon County 5 falling falling trend higher 148 216.6 (200.9, 233.3) 1.2 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Tazewell County 8 falling falling trend similar 163 194.4 (181.0, 208.5) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
Clay County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 219.4 (176.7, 270.2) 1.2 -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Mercer County 5 falling falling trend higher 26 215.9 (179.4, 258.9) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Jo Daviess County 8 falling falling trend similar 36 189.2 (161.3, 221.6) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Bureau County 5 falling falling trend higher 51 209.4 (184.1, 237.6) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Christian County 5 falling falling trend higher 47 206.1 (180.1, 235.1) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Shelby County 8 falling falling trend similar 30 179.1 (151.1, 211.6) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Vermilion County 5 falling falling trend higher 115 231.0 (212.1, 251.3) 1.3 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Lawrence County 5 falling falling trend higher 25 262.8 (218.4, 313.9) 1.5 -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Cass County 5 falling falling trend higher 16 228.0 (180.4, 284.7) 1.3 -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Richland County 8 falling falling trend similar 21 196.2 (159.7, 239.2) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Effingham County 8 falling falling trend similar 35 173.8 (148.3, 202.6) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Woodford County 8 falling falling trend similar 47 195.5 (170.6, 223.1) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Union County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 212.8 (177.1, 254.6) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Jefferson County 5 falling falling trend higher 54 217.8 (192.2, 246.1) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Whiteside County 8 falling falling trend similar 78 196.7 (177.2, 218.0) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Stark County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 240.5 (176.6, 323.7) 1.4 -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Alexander County 4 stable stable trend higher 13 290.5 (223.2, 375.3) 1.6 -0.7 (-1.8, 0.3)
Crawford County 8 falling falling trend similar 23 188.3 (155.1, 227.0) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
La Salle County 5 falling falling trend higher 165 230.6 (214.7, 247.3) 1.3 -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Calhoun County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 217.1 (154.8, 301.2) 1.2 -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Mason County 4 stable stable trend higher 29 292.3 (245.5, 346.6) 1.6 -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Morgan County 4 stable stable trend higher 49 223.4 (195.7, 254.2) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.2, 0.2)
Marion County 4 stable stable trend higher 62 248.4 (220.8, 278.7) 1.4 -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Fulton County 4 stable stable trend higher 60 250.5 (222.6, 281.3) 1.4 -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Macoupin County 5 falling falling trend higher 74 240.0 (215.5, 266.7) 1.4 -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Brown County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 248.3 (179.4, 335.2) 1.4 -0.5 (-1.9, 1.0)
Marshall County 4 stable stable trend higher 21 235.4 (191.3, 288.1) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Moultrie County 4 stable stable trend higher 22 240.2 (196.8, 290.9) 1.4 -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Clark County 4 stable stable trend higher 22 225.2 (184.0, 273.3) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Hamilton County 4 stable stable trend higher 14 248.1 (192.2, 317.1) 1.4 -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Logan County 4 stable stable trend higher 41 235.7 (204.1, 271.0) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Scott County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 240.7 (169.5, 334.7) 1.4 -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Pike County 4 stable stable trend higher 28 251.5 (210.4, 299.1) 1.4 -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Iroquois County 4 stable stable trend higher 45 224.8 (195.7, 257.6) 1.3 -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Pope County
**
** similar 7 185.2 (126.3, 272.1) 1.0
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/17/2024 1:44 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).
Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Pope County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top