Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Kansas Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Male

Sorted by rateratio
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate ascending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 315,770 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) - -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Kansas - falling falling trend - 2,926 183.7 (180.6, 186.7) - -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
Kingman County 4 stable stable trend higher 18 349.4 (278.1, 435.2) 2.0 12.7 (-1.3, 28.6)
Elk County 4 stable stable trend higher 7 337.3 (228.5, 490.7) 1.9 0.3 (-1.3, 1.8)
Edwards County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 276.5 (179.0, 413.6) 1.6 0.0 (-1.6, 1.7)
Wilson County 4 stable stable trend higher 15 261.2 (204.6, 330.0) 1.5 -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Harper County 4 stable stable trend higher 10 260.5 (192.4, 347.6) 1.5 -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Crawford County 5 falling falling trend higher 51 255.2 (224.1, 289.5) 1.4 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Ellsworth County 4 stable stable trend higher 11 245.0 (183.5, 322.6) 1.4 -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Cherokee County 5 falling falling trend higher 31 238.6 (201.5, 281.0) 1.3 -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Doniphan County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 236.0 (179.6, 306.4) 1.3 -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Trego County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 229.7 (150.5, 346.4) 1.3 -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Rawlins County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 227.2 (148.0, 346.7) 1.3 0.9 (-0.7, 2.5)
Atchison County 4 stable stable trend higher 21 225.0 (183.2, 273.9) 1.3 -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Franklin County 4 stable stable trend higher 35 223.4 (190.5, 260.8) 1.3 -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Logan County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 221.3 (133.2, 349.9) 1.2 0.2 (-1.9, 2.4)
Wyandotte County 5 falling falling trend higher 161 220.4 (204.8, 236.9) 1.2 -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Barber County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 219.9 (152.4, 311.3) 1.2 -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Grant County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 219.7 (150.4, 308.7) 1.2 -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Cowley County 5 falling falling trend higher 48 216.3 (189.2, 246.4) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Bourbon County 6 stable stable trend similar 20 215.5 (174.2, 264.2) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Rush County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 214.9 (142.9, 320.1) 1.2 -1.0 (-2.6, 0.8)
Chase County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 214.8 (128.1, 344.4) 1.2 0.1 (-1.8, 2.1)
Decatur County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 214.3 (145.0, 319.3) 1.2 -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Allen County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 213.3 (170.5, 264.5) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Montgomery County 5 falling falling trend higher 44 212.0 (184.2, 243.1) 1.2 -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Neosho County 8 falling falling trend similar 23 211.3 (173.6, 255.5) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Russell County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 210.1 (157.0, 278.3) 1.2 13.4 (-8.4, 40.3)
Geary County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 210.0 (170.3, 255.5) 1.2 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Anderson County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 206.7 (154.3, 272.8) 1.2 -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Labette County 6 stable stable trend similar 27 204.0 (170.0, 243.3) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Rice County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 203.4 (154.8, 263.4) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Greenwood County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 202.7 (150.0, 272.2) 1.1 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Leavenworth County 5 falling falling trend higher 86 202.1 (182.7, 222.9) 1.1 -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Nemaha County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 201.4 (156.2, 256.8) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Ness County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 200.6 (121.0, 320.6) 1.1 -37.4 (-72.7, 43.7)
Linn County 6 stable stable trend similar 16 200.0 (157.2, 253.1) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Brown County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 197.6 (151.7, 254.5) 1.1 -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Coffey County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 197.5 (147.6, 260.8) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Graham County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 197.2 (123.0, 315.7) 1.1 -2.3 (-4.4, -0.2)
Sumner County 8 falling falling trend similar 29 196.6 (165.2, 232.6) 1.1 -1.8 (-2.2, -1.3)
Lyon County 6 stable stable trend similar 33 194.4 (165.3, 227.1) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Reno County 8 falling falling trend similar 79 194.0 (175.0, 214.7) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Woodson County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 194.0 (123.0, 299.3) 1.1 1.1 (-0.8, 3.1)
Osage County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 193.5 (157.5, 236.1) 1.1 -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Jefferson County 8 falling falling trend similar 25 192.9 (159.3, 232.1) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Pratt County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 192.8 (146.4, 250.7) 1.1 -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Phillips County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 191.9 (136.2, 267.0) 1.1 -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Pawnee County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 191.3 (138.8, 259.6) 1.1 -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Saline County 8 falling falling trend similar 64 190.9 (170.2, 213.7) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
McPherson County 6 stable stable trend similar 38 190.4 (163.4, 220.9) 1.1 -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Dickinson County 8 falling falling trend similar 24 189.8 (157.1, 228.0) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Republic County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 189.7 (129.4, 273.9) 1.1 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Shawnee County 8 falling falling trend similar 200 188.3 (176.5, 200.6) 1.1 -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Marshall County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 188.1 (145.3, 241.3) 1.1 -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Jewell County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 187.5 (121.8, 289.1) 1.1 -0.3 (-1.9, 1.4)
Sedgwick County 8 falling falling trend similar 487 185.9 (178.3, 193.6) 1.0 -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Cloud County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 184.9 (138.8, 243.0) 1.0 -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5)
Butler County 8 falling falling trend similar 69 184.9 (165.3, 206.2) 1.0 -2.8 (-4.5, -1.0)
Washington County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 183.7 (129.5, 256.3) 1.0 -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Morris County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 183.5 (130.2, 255.3) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Ottawa County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 183.3 (127.0, 258.1) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Scott County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 182.9 (123.6, 263.7) 1.0 -0.2 (-2.0, 1.8)
Marion County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 181.2 (144.3, 226.5) 1.0 -0.3 (-1.6, 0.9)
Seward County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 180.4 (139.6, 228.5) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Wabaunsee County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 178.9 (128.3, 245.2) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Osborne County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 177.7 (117.6, 266.3) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
Harvey County 6 stable stable trend similar 41 177.4 (153.3, 204.5) 1.0 -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Kiowa County 6 stable stable trend similar 3 176.1 (100.5, 296.4) 1.0 -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Barton County 8 falling falling trend similar 31 173.9 (147.0, 204.8) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Finney County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 173.2 (143.8, 206.6) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Ellis County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 172.2 (143.3, 205.3) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Jackson County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 171.2 (133.8, 216.6) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Lincoln County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 170.4 (103.8, 273.7) 1.0 0.3 (-1.3, 1.8)
Mitchell County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 169.9 (119.2, 237.9) 1.0 -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Clay County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 168.8 (125.5, 224.5) 1.0 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Ford County 8 falling falling trend similar 23 168.6 (138.6, 202.8) 1.0 -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Stafford County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 162.8 (107.7, 242.5) 0.9 -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Thomas County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 160.5 (112.9, 222.7) 0.9 -2.5 (-3.5, -1.4)
Pottawatomie County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 160.4 (129.2, 196.9) 0.9 -1.6 (-2.7, -0.6)
Douglas County 8 falling falling trend similar 78 160.3 (144.2, 177.6) 0.9 -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Chautauqua County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 159.2 (101.7, 247.1) 0.9 -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Sherman County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 152.8 (102.7, 221.2) 0.9 -1.4 (-3.0, 0.1)
Gove County 6 stable stable trend similar 3 152.8 (85.1, 261.7) 0.9 -2.3 (-4.7, 0.1)
Riley County 9 falling falling trend lower 38 151.6 (130.1, 175.5) 0.9 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Johnson County 9 falling falling trend lower 437 150.7 (144.3, 157.3) 0.8 -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
Smith County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 148.6 (94.3, 233.0) 0.8 -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Meade County 8 falling falling trend similar 4 144.9 (86.4, 230.9) 0.8 -1.6 (-2.8, -0.3)
Miami County 9 falling falling trend lower 29 141.8 (119.2, 167.6) 0.8 -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Gray County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 139.8 (87.4, 212.5) 0.8 -3.0 (-4.6, -1.3)
Stevens County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 137.1 (83.8, 212.6) 0.8 -1.8 (-3.7, 0.1)
Norton County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 135.8 (89.2, 200.8) 0.8 -2.9 (-4.4, -1.4)
Rooks County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 127.9 (83.0, 193.9) 0.7 -3.4 (-4.9, -1.9)
Kearny County
**
** similar 4 188.0 (108.7, 301.9) 1.1
**
Morton County
**
** similar 5 256.2 (161.2, 393.1) 1.4
**
Sheridan County
**
** similar 3 146.5 (83.9, 250.9) 0.8
**
Wichita County
**
** similar 4 300.9 (183.4, 470.9) 1.7
**
Cheyenne County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Clark County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Comanche County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Greeley County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Hamilton County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Haskell County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Hodgeman County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Lane County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Stanton County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Wallace County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/14/2024 6:24 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Cheyenne County, Clark County, Comanche County, Greeley County, Hamilton County, Haskell County, Hodgeman County, Lane County, Stanton County, Wallace County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Kearny County, Morton County, Sheridan County, Wichita County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top