Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Mississippi Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Male

Sorted by rateratio
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate ascending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 315,770 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) - -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Mississippi - falling falling trend - 3,575 225.9 (222.5, 229.3) - -1.6 (-1.7, -1.5)
Bolivar County 5 falling falling trend higher 48 327.9 (284.8, 375.6) 1.8 -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Sunflower County 4 stable stable trend higher 39 314.7 (270.1, 364.5) 1.8 -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Leflore County 4 stable stable trend higher 39 303.4 (260.8, 350.9) 1.7 -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Quitman County 5 falling falling trend higher 12 298.9 (225.6, 389.6) 1.7 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Madison County 5 falling falling trend higher 126 290.1 (266.2, 315.4) 1.6 -2.9 (-4.4, -1.5)
Claiborne County 4 stable stable trend higher 12 281.0 (211.8, 365.8) 1.6 -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Tippah County 4 stable stable trend higher 34 276.5 (234.9, 323.5) 1.6 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Yazoo County 4 stable stable trend higher 36 276.4 (236.0, 321.5) 1.6 -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Wilkinson County 4 stable stable trend higher 14 275.6 (212.4, 352.1) 1.6 -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Tunica County 5 falling falling trend higher 13 272.2 (207.5, 350.9) 1.5 -2.0 (-3.2, -0.7)
Marshall County 5 falling falling trend higher 57 271.2 (239.0, 306.7) 1.5 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Lee County 5 falling falling trend higher 109 270.3 (247.2, 294.9) 1.5 -3.9 (-6.7, -1.0)
Lawrence County 4 stable stable trend higher 20 270.1 (217.6, 331.7) 1.5 -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Jefferson County 4 stable stable trend higher 11 269.6 (199.8, 356.6) 1.5 -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Coahoma County 4 stable stable trend higher 31 266.0 (223.6, 314.3) 1.5 -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Washington County 5 falling falling trend higher 60 265.1 (234.1, 299.1) 1.5 -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Yalobusha County 5 falling falling trend higher 22 264.0 (214.8, 322.1) 1.5 -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Lowndes County 5 falling falling trend higher 78 261.4 (235.1, 289.9) 1.5 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Holmes County 4 stable stable trend higher 23 261.4 (214.6, 315.5) 1.5 -0.7 (-1.8, 0.3)
Chickasaw County 5 falling falling trend higher 25 260.9 (216.0, 312.6) 1.5 -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Tallahatchie County 4 stable stable trend higher 19 260.6 (209.5, 320.4) 1.5 -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Union County 4 stable stable trend higher 41 259.9 (224.6, 299.3) 1.5 -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Noxubee County 5 falling falling trend higher 14 257.9 (198.9, 329.2) 1.5 -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
Scott County 5 falling falling trend higher 37 255.0 (218.3, 296.0) 1.4 -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Adams County 5 falling falling trend higher 48 252.6 (220.7, 288.0) 1.4 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Tishomingo County 5 falling falling trend higher 31 249.6 (210.5, 294.3) 1.4 -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Grenada County 4 stable stable trend higher 30 249.5 (209.7, 295.0) 1.4 -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Covington County 5 falling falling trend higher 26 249.5 (207.5, 297.7) 1.4 -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Sharkey County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 248.8 (170.7, 353.6) 1.4 -2.6 (-3.9, -1.3)
Montgomery County 5 falling falling trend higher 16 247.1 (193.8, 311.7) 1.4 -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
George County 5 falling falling trend higher 29 246.9 (205.9, 293.5) 1.4 -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Stone County 5 falling falling trend higher 25 245.6 (202.3, 295.6) 1.4 -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Prentiss County 4 stable stable trend higher 36 243.4 (208.4, 282.8) 1.4 -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Harrison County 5 falling falling trend higher 260 243.2 (229.8, 257.3) 1.4 -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Newton County 5 falling falling trend higher 27 241.9 (202.3, 287.2) 1.4 -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Attala County 4 stable stable trend higher 28 241.8 (202.3, 287.4) 1.4 -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Neshoba County 4 stable stable trend higher 36 236.8 (202.5, 275.4) 1.3 -0.2 (-0.8, 0.3)
Clarke County 4 stable stable trend higher 25 236.0 (195.2, 283.6) 1.3 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Pearl River County 5 falling falling trend higher 81 233.9 (210.9, 258.9) 1.3 -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Panola County 5 falling falling trend higher 44 233.3 (202.3, 267.7) 1.3 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Lincoln County 5 falling falling trend higher 44 230.2 (199.9, 263.9) 1.3 -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Humphreys County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 230.2 (169.8, 305.9) 1.3 -4.5 (-6.8, -2.2)
Perry County 4 stable stable trend higher 17 228.3 (180.8, 285.1) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Alcorn County 5 falling falling trend higher 51 227.7 (200.0, 258.4) 1.3 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Warren County 5 falling falling trend higher 59 227.0 (200.6, 256.0) 1.3 -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Forrest County 5 falling falling trend higher 77 225.3 (202.8, 249.5) 1.3 -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Pontotoc County 5 falling falling trend higher 38 224.9 (193.1, 260.5) 1.3 -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Tate County 4 stable stable trend higher 35 223.8 (190.8, 260.9) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Copiah County 5 falling falling trend higher 36 223.4 (190.8, 260.2) 1.3 -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Hinds County 4 stable stable trend higher 246 223.3 (210.5, 236.7) 1.3 -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Clay County 5 falling falling trend higher 26 222.0 (184.4, 265.5) 1.3 -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Jasper County 5 falling falling trend higher 25 221.5 (183.8, 265.5) 1.2 -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Jackson County 5 falling falling trend higher 171 217.1 (202.2, 232.8) 1.2 -1.9 (-2.4, -1.5)
Monroe County 5 falling falling trend higher 48 216.9 (189.6, 247.3) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Leake County 5 falling falling trend higher 27 216.3 (180.3, 257.4) 1.2 -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Marion County 5 falling falling trend higher 33 215.8 (183.5, 252.6) 1.2 -1.9 (-2.7, -1.2)
Pike County 5 falling falling trend higher 47 214.6 (187.2, 244.9) 1.2 -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Calhoun County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 214.2 (171.1, 265.5) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
DeSoto County 5 falling falling trend higher 171 213.1 (198.3, 228.7) 1.2 -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Webster County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 209.8 (157.7, 274.4) 1.2 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Wayne County 8 falling falling trend similar 23 207.3 (170.1, 250.3) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Oktibbeha County 8 falling falling trend similar 38 200.6 (172.2, 232.2) 1.1 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Hancock County 8 falling falling trend similar 65 199.8 (178.0, 223.9) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Jefferson Davis County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 199.7 (155.5, 253.8) 1.1 -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Itawamba County 8 falling falling trend similar 27 194.9 (163.0, 231.5) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Carroll County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 193.5 (151.0, 246.2) 1.1 -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Lafayette County 8 falling falling trend similar 42 192.6 (165.8, 222.4) 1.1 -2.1 (-2.7, -1.6)
Lauderdale County 8 falling falling trend similar 81 191.3 (172.7, 211.5) 1.1 -3.5 (-4.4, -2.6)
Jones County 8 falling falling trend similar 71 188.3 (168.8, 209.5) 1.1 -1.8 (-2.3, -1.4)
Simpson County 8 falling falling trend similar 29 184.1 (154.4, 218.1) 1.0 -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Kemper County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 183.8 (140.6, 238.0) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Greene County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 183.5 (142.2, 233.2) 1.0 -2.2 (-3.3, -1.0)
Walthall County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 179.9 (143.3, 223.9) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Smith County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 177.4 (141.8, 220.0) 1.0 -6.1 (-9.0, -3.0)
Choctaw County 8 falling falling trend similar 10 177.2 (130.9, 236.6) 1.0 -2.1 (-3.3, -0.8)
Winston County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 172.6 (139.7, 211.5) 1.0 -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7)
Benton County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 167.9 (122.2, 226.8) 0.9 -4.8 (-7.0, -2.6)
Rankin County 8 falling falling trend similar 132 167.9 (155.0, 181.6) 0.9 -3.1 (-4.9, -1.2)
Amite County 8 falling falling trend similar 16 162.6 (128.3, 205.0) 0.9 -3.6 (-4.9, -2.3)
Lamar County 8 falling falling trend similar 47 162.1 (141.5, 184.8) 0.9 -2.5 (-3.1, -1.9)
Franklin County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 156.4 (110.1, 217.3) 0.9 -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Issaquena County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/20/2024 3:13 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Issaquena County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top