Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

North Carolina Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Male

Sorted by priority index
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 315,770 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) - -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
North Carolina - falling falling trend - 10,427 187.5 (185.9, 189.2) - -2.5 (-3.0, -2.0)
Rutherford County 4 stable stable trend higher 99 217.2 (197.8, 238.2) 1.2 0.5 (-1.7, 2.7)
Swain County 4 stable stable trend higher 23 256.7 (211.3, 309.7) 1.4 -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Yancey County 4 stable stable trend higher 31 214.2 (181.2, 252.7) 1.2 0.4 (-0.5, 1.4)
Alamance County 5 falling falling trend higher 192 208.2 (195.0, 222.0) 1.2 -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Beaufort County 5 falling falling trend higher 70 203.3 (181.4, 227.4) 1.1 -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Bladen County 5 falling falling trend higher 48 209.8 (182.8, 240.1) 1.2 -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Burke County 5 falling falling trend higher 122 203.9 (187.6, 221.4) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Caldwell County 5 falling falling trend higher 113 208.8 (191.3, 227.6) 1.2 -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Caswell County 5 falling falling trend higher 38 223.6 (191.7, 260.0) 1.3 -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Catawba County 5 falling falling trend higher 183 199.7 (186.6, 213.6) 1.1 -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Cleveland County 5 falling falling trend higher 133 230.0 (212.1, 249.1) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Columbus County 5 falling falling trend higher 77 217.6 (195.6, 241.5) 1.2 -1.9 (-2.4, -1.3)
Craven County 5 falling falling trend higher 131 212.1 (195.8, 229.5) 1.2 -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Cumberland County 5 falling falling trend higher 268 200.9 (189.9, 212.4) 1.1 -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Davidson County 5 falling falling trend higher 219 216.1 (203.1, 229.8) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Davie County 5 falling falling trend higher 60 202.9 (180.1, 228.1) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Edgecombe County 5 falling falling trend higher 76 243.0 (218.2, 269.9) 1.4 -1.8 (-2.3, -1.4)
Franklin County 5 falling falling trend higher 80 210.1 (189.1, 232.8) 1.2 -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Gaston County 5 falling falling trend higher 243 205.0 (193.2, 217.3) 1.2 -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Greene County 5 falling falling trend higher 27 224.3 (185.8, 268.6) 1.3 -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
Halifax County 5 falling falling trend higher 79 236.2 (212.6, 261.9) 1.3 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Harnett County 5 falling falling trend higher 121 208.0 (190.9, 226.1) 1.2 -2.0 (-2.4, -1.6)
Johnston County 5 falling falling trend higher 181 202.2 (188.3, 216.9) 1.1 -2.2 (-2.5, -1.9)
Lee County 5 falling falling trend higher 72 209.6 (187.8, 233.3) 1.2 -1.9 (-2.3, -1.4)
Lenoir County 5 falling falling trend higher 74 206.3 (185.2, 229.3) 1.2 -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Lincoln County 5 falling falling trend higher 99 196.0 (178.3, 214.9) 1.1 -1.6 (-2.0, -1.3)
McDowell County 5 falling falling trend higher 67 215.4 (192.4, 240.7) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Nash County 5 falling falling trend higher 115 208.9 (191.5, 227.6) 1.2 -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Onslow County 5 falling falling trend higher 149 234.8 (217.7, 252.7) 1.3 -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Pasquotank County 5 falling falling trend higher 48 213.2 (186.4, 242.8) 1.2 -2.2 (-2.6, -1.7)
Person County 5 falling falling trend higher 53 207.1 (181.8, 235.1) 1.2 -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Randolph County 5 falling falling trend higher 180 209.1 (195.2, 223.7) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Richmond County 5 falling falling trend higher 59 223.6 (198.1, 251.6) 1.3 -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Robeson County 5 falling falling trend higher 164 246.2 (228.8, 264.6) 1.4 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Rockingham County 5 falling falling trend higher 132 217.2 (200.4, 235.1) 1.2 -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Rowan County 5 falling falling trend higher 180 219.5 (205.0, 234.8) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Sampson County 5 falling falling trend higher 86 233.9 (211.7, 257.8) 1.3 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Scotland County 5 falling falling trend higher 45 217.8 (189.1, 249.7) 1.2 -1.6 (-2.3, -1.0)
Stanly County 5 falling falling trend higher 77 201.0 (180.8, 223.0) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Stokes County 5 falling falling trend higher 67 211.1 (188.2, 236.4) 1.2 -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Surry County 5 falling falling trend higher 109 232.4 (212.9, 253.5) 1.3 -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Vance County 5 falling falling trend higher 63 246.3 (218.6, 276.8) 1.4 -1.7 (-2.3, -1.2)
Wayne County 5 falling falling trend higher 142 213.2 (197.4, 230.0) 1.2 -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Wilkes County 5 falling falling trend higher 96 198.6 (180.8, 217.9) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Wilson County 5 falling falling trend higher 92 197.3 (179.1, 216.9) 1.1 -1.8 (-2.3, -1.4)
Yadkin County 5 falling falling trend higher 50 213.1 (186.9, 242.1) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Hyde County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 198.5 (133.4, 286.5) 1.1 -1.2 (-2.6, 0.3)
Jones County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 221.3 (171.1, 283.2) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Tyrrell County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 220.7 (151.6, 314.6) 1.2 -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
Alexander County 8 falling falling trend similar 47 189.2 (165.0, 216.2) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Alleghany County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 172.1 (138.0, 214.8) 1.0 -2.2 (-3.1, -1.2)
Anson County 8 falling falling trend similar 30 198.0 (166.1, 234.5) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Ashe County 8 falling falling trend similar 43 188.9 (163.5, 218.0) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Avery County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 150.1 (121.6, 184.3) 0.8 -1.9 (-3.0, -0.9)
Bertie County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 192.5 (160.2, 230.2) 1.1 -2.5 (-3.1, -1.9)
Brunswick County 8 falling falling trend similar 222 180.8 (169.2, 193.1) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Buncombe County 8 falling falling trend similar 280 171.1 (162.1, 180.6) 1.0 -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
Cabarrus County 8 falling falling trend similar 160 172.1 (159.9, 185.0) 1.0 -2.1 (-2.4, -1.7)
Camden County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 205.8 (157.2, 265.3) 1.2 -2.3 (-3.6, -0.9)
Carteret County 8 falling falling trend similar 109 193.9 (177.3, 211.8) 1.1 -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Chatham County 8 falling falling trend similar 93 163.7 (148.9, 179.9) 0.9 -2.0 (-2.5, -1.6)
Cherokee County 8 falling falling trend similar 45 166.8 (144.1, 193.0) 0.9 -2.0 (-2.6, -1.3)
Chowan County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 200.5 (163.4, 245.1) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Clay County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 150.7 (116.0, 195.0) 0.8 -2.1 (-3.0, -1.2)
Currituck County 8 falling falling trend similar 30 167.2 (140.0, 198.5) 0.9 -2.6 (-3.4, -1.7)
Dare County 8 falling falling trend similar 52 194.7 (170.5, 221.7) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Duplin County 8 falling falling trend similar 62 171.4 (152.2, 192.3) 1.0 -2.8 (-3.3, -2.3)
Durham County 8 falling falling trend similar 232 171.5 (161.4, 182.0) 1.0 -3.5 (-4.3, -2.6)
Forsyth County 8 falling falling trend similar 356 182.7 (174.2, 191.7) 1.0 -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
Gates County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 176.8 (135.7, 227.7) 1.0 -2.3 (-3.6, -1.1)
Graham County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 169.3 (127.7, 222.8) 1.0 -2.0 (-3.2, -0.7)
Granville County 8 falling falling trend similar 69 199.2 (177.8, 222.5) 1.1 -4.3 (-5.7, -2.9)
Guilford County 8 falling falling trend similar 477 179.5 (172.2, 187.0) 1.0 -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Haywood County 8 falling falling trend similar 84 177.8 (160.6, 196.5) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Hertford County 8 falling falling trend similar 28 188.6 (157.7, 224.3) 1.1 -2.4 (-3.1, -1.8)
Hoke County 8 falling falling trend similar 40 204.6 (174.6, 237.9) 1.2 -2.6 (-3.6, -1.7)
Iredell County 8 falling falling trend similar 172 184.9 (172.3, 198.2) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Jackson County 8 falling falling trend similar 48 176.6 (154.2, 201.7) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
Macon County 8 falling falling trend similar 59 192.4 (170.0, 217.5) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Madison County 8 falling falling trend similar 28 187.0 (156.5, 222.5) 1.1 -4.2 (-6.5, -1.8)
Martin County 8 falling falling trend similar 33 195.5 (165.6, 230.0) 1.1 -2.9 (-3.6, -2.1)
Mecklenburg County 8 falling falling trend similar 665 162.1 (156.3, 167.9) 0.9 -2.3 (-2.4, -2.1)
Mitchell County 8 falling falling trend similar 24 209.0 (171.6, 253.4) 1.2 -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Montgomery County 8 falling falling trend similar 37 202.3 (173.1, 235.5) 1.1 -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Moore County 8 falling falling trend similar 127 164.7 (151.8, 178.6) 0.9 -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
New Hanover County 8 falling falling trend similar 225 172.5 (162.3, 183.1) 1.0 -2.2 (-2.5, -1.9)
Northampton County 8 falling falling trend similar 28 182.5 (151.7, 218.6) 1.0 -1.8 (-2.7, -1.0)
Pamlico County 8 falling falling trend similar 21 173.9 (140.0, 215.8) 1.0 -2.5 (-3.3, -1.7)
Pender County 8 falling falling trend similar 74 196.1 (175.8, 218.3) 1.1 -1.9 (-2.4, -1.3)
Perquimans County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 168.0 (135.1, 208.5) 0.9 -2.6 (-3.4, -1.9)
Pitt County 8 falling falling trend similar 139 178.8 (165.2, 193.1) 1.0 -2.5 (-2.8, -2.2)
Transylvania County 8 falling falling trend similar 52 158.0 (137.9, 181.1) 0.9 -2.0 (-2.6, -1.3)
Union County 8 falling falling trend similar 183 174.7 (162.8, 187.2) 1.0 -2.0 (-2.4, -1.6)
Warren County 8 falling falling trend similar 30 182.6 (153.5, 216.8) 1.0 -2.5 (-3.4, -1.6)
Washington County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 212.6 (168.1, 266.8) 1.2 -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Henderson County 9 falling falling trend lower 150 159.5 (148.0, 171.9) 0.9 -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Orange County 9 falling falling trend lower 98 150.6 (136.9, 165.3) 0.8 -2.4 (-2.9, -1.8)
Polk County 9 falling falling trend lower 29 144.0 (120.2, 172.7) 0.8 -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Wake County 9 falling falling trend lower 670 156.2 (150.7, 161.8) 0.9 -5.4 (-10.2, -0.4)
Watauga County 9 falling falling trend lower 41 139.8 (120.8, 161.2) 0.8 -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/08/2024 3:15 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top