Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Oklahoma Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Male

Sorted by trend
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
United States - falling falling trend - 315,770 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) - -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Oklahoma - falling falling trend - 4,451 209.2 (206.4, 212.0) - -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Washington County 1 rising rising trend higher 79 233.9 (211.0, 258.9) 1.3 1.6 (0.2, 3.1)
Tillman County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 179.8 (131.3, 242.3) 1.0 0.8 (-4.5, 6.4)
Major County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 183.4 (133.6, 247.4) 1.0 0.4 (-0.9, 1.8)
Okfuskee County 4 stable stable trend higher 26 331.7 (276.0, 395.9) 1.9 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Atoka County 4 stable stable trend higher 23 241.5 (198.3, 291.9) 1.4 0.1 (-0.9, 1.0)
Seminole County 4 stable stable trend higher 39 259.6 (223.5, 300.3) 1.5 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Pittsburg County 4 stable stable trend higher 69 238.5 (213.5, 265.7) 1.3 -5.6 (-11.9, 1.3)
Beaver County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 166.5 (112.3, 240.8) 0.9 -2.4 (-3.7, -1.0)
Logan County 8 falling falling trend similar 49 180.6 (158.0, 205.5) 1.0 -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Hughes County 5 falling falling trend higher 20 232.6 (188.3, 284.6) 1.3 -17.4 (-25.6, -8.3)
Murray County 5 falling falling trend higher 22 224.1 (182.9, 272.7) 1.3 -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Ellis County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 182.9 (115.7, 278.9) 1.0 -1.6 (-3.1, -0.1)
Coal County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 214.2 (152.0, 295.9) 1.2 -1.6 (-3.0, -0.3)
Bryan County 5 falling falling trend higher 58 206.9 (183.4, 232.7) 1.2 -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Delaware County 8 falling falling trend similar 71 196.4 (175.6, 219.5) 1.1 -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Latimer County 5 falling falling trend higher 20 240.0 (193.5, 295.8) 1.4 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Marshall County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 202.6 (168.5, 242.7) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Adair County 8 falling falling trend similar 25 195.8 (162.3, 234.6) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Wagoner County 8 falling falling trend similar 77 165.0 (148.5, 182.9) 0.9 -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
McCurtain County 5 falling falling trend higher 46 226.3 (197.4, 258.4) 1.3 -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Woods County 8 falling falling trend similar 10 176.5 (130.2, 235.1) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Haskell County 5 falling falling trend higher 20 224.7 (182.3, 275.2) 1.3 -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Craig County 5 falling falling trend higher 22 226.9 (185.5, 275.6) 1.3 -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Noble County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 220.9 (175.2, 276.0) 1.2 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Tulsa County 5 falling falling trend higher 625 199.0 (191.9, 206.3) 1.1 -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
McClain County 5 falling falling trend higher 45 215.1 (187.3, 245.9) 1.2 -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Osage County 8 falling falling trend similar 59 178.2 (157.9, 200.8) 1.0 -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Mayes County 5 falling falling trend higher 56 216.3 (191.0, 244.3) 1.2 -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Comanche County 5 falling falling trend higher 117 213.6 (196.3, 232.0) 1.2 -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Oklahoma County 5 falling falling trend higher 745 202.8 (196.2, 209.6) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Sequoyah County 5 falling falling trend higher 64 251.9 (224.4, 282.1) 1.4 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Canadian County 8 falling falling trend similar 124 188.5 (173.4, 204.5) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Grady County 5 falling falling trend higher 65 204.7 (182.3, 229.2) 1.2 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Beckham County 5 falling falling trend higher 27 231.7 (193.5, 275.3) 1.3 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Rogers County 5 falling falling trend higher 108 199.9 (183.1, 218.0) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Nowata County 4 stable stable trend higher 19 266.7 (214.7, 328.6) 1.5 -1.0 (-2.3, 0.2)
McIntosh County 5 falling falling trend higher 38 223.3 (191.7, 259.7) 1.3 -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Payne County 8 falling falling trend similar 65 183.4 (163.8, 204.8) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Pontotoc County 5 falling falling trend higher 46 217.4 (190.0, 247.7) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Ottawa County 5 falling falling trend higher 49 260.6 (228.4, 296.3) 1.5 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Le Flore County 5 falling falling trend higher 71 238.3 (213.5, 265.4) 1.3 -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Cleveland County 8 falling falling trend similar 234 177.2 (166.9, 188.0) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Garfield County 5 falling falling trend higher 67 199.2 (178.1, 222.1) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Johnston County 4 stable stable trend higher 18 245.6 (197.2, 303.4) 1.4 -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Lincoln County 5 falling falling trend higher 51 223.6 (196.5, 253.8) 1.3 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Carter County 5 falling falling trend higher 63 232.0 (206.4, 259.9) 1.3 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Muskogee County 5 falling falling trend higher 96 244.7 (222.7, 268.3) 1.4 -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Harmon County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 247.2 (148.6, 390.7) 1.4 -0.8 (-3.1, 1.6)
Dewey County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 227.8 (149.4, 332.8) 1.3 -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5)
Woodward County 6 stable stable trend similar 22 189.4 (155.1, 229.1) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Kingfisher County 6 stable stable trend similar 17 194.6 (155.1, 241.5) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Pawnee County 4 stable stable trend higher 24 219.9 (181.1, 265.2) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Texas County 6 stable stable trend similar 19 220.3 (176.3, 271.2) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Washita County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 211.7 (163.7, 270.0) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Jefferson County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 246.4 (180.8, 330.0) 1.4 -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Blaine County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 222.2 (171.5, 284.2) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Love County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 239.8 (189.4, 300.7) 1.4 -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Choctaw County 4 stable stable trend higher 24 225.2 (186.1, 271.1) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Cherokee County 5 falling falling trend higher 65 236.5 (210.8, 264.6) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Stephens County 5 falling falling trend higher 65 227.9 (203.1, 255.2) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Kay County 5 falling falling trend higher 64 226.6 (202.2, 253.5) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Creek County 5 falling falling trend higher 104 233.8 (213.7, 255.4) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Pushmataha County 6 stable stable trend similar 19 221.5 (178.9, 272.9) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Kiowa County 4 stable stable trend higher 15 251.8 (196.6, 319.1) 1.4 -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Garvin County 4 stable stable trend higher 40 241.2 (208.6, 277.8) 1.4 -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Okmulgee County 5 falling falling trend higher 59 248.0 (219.8, 278.9) 1.4 -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Pottawatomie County 5 falling falling trend higher 92 233.1 (211.9, 255.9) 1.3 -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Custer County 6 stable stable trend similar 29 208.5 (175.4, 246.0) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Cotton County 4 stable stable trend higher 11 277.9 (206.0, 369.0) 1.6 -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Jackson County 6 stable stable trend similar 26 203.5 (169.4, 242.6) 1.1 -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Caddo County 4 stable stable trend higher 43 255.9 (222.0, 293.6) 1.4 -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Grant County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 225.2 (156.3, 318.3) 1.3 -0.2 (-1.8, 1.5)
Alfalfa County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 195.3 (140.6, 266.5) 1.1 -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Greer County 4 stable stable trend higher 11 315.2 (237.7, 411.0) 1.8 -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Harper County
**
** similar 5 226.7 (147.8, 335.7) 1.3
**
Roger Mills County
**
** similar 6 231.2 (155.3, 336.4) 1.3
**
Cimarron County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/18/2024 8:57 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Cimarron County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Harper County, Roger Mills County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top