Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Utah Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Male

Sorted by priority index
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 315,770 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) - -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Utah - falling falling trend - 1,751 140.5 (137.5, 143.6) - -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Grand County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 199.0 (150.4, 259.4) 1.1 -1.1 (-2.4, 0.1)
Juab County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 152.1 (106.4, 210.0) 0.9 -0.3 (-2.2, 1.7)
Sevier County 6 stable stable trend similar 23 192.4 (158.6, 231.4) 1.1 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Box Elder County 7 stable stable trend lower 37 139.5 (119.8, 161.5) 0.8 0.1 (-1.8, 2.0)
Davis County 7 stable stable trend lower 169 132.5 (123.5, 142.0) 0.7 -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
San Juan County 7 stable stable trend lower 9 107.1 (77.0, 145.2) 0.6 -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
Beaver County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 136.6 (85.6, 206.6) 0.8 -1.9 (-3.7, -0.1)
Carbon County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 177.8 (144.0, 217.4) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Duchesne County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 164.8 (129.2, 207.1) 0.9 -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Garfield County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 129.5 (81.8, 198.4) 0.7 -2.5 (-4.5, -0.4)
Kane County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 166.2 (117.6, 229.6) 0.9 -2.1 (-4.1, 0.0)
Tooele County 8 falling falling trend similar 39 164.3 (140.5, 190.8) 0.9 -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Uintah County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 150.7 (122.8, 182.8) 0.8 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Cache County 9 falling falling trend lower 56 127.9 (113.1, 143.9) 0.7 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Emery County 9 falling falling trend lower 8 133.7 (95.1, 183.7) 0.8 -2.7 (-4.3, -1.1)
Iron County 9 falling falling trend lower 34 149.8 (127.3, 174.9) 0.8 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.6)
Millard County 9 falling falling trend lower 10 117.3 (86.1, 157.0) 0.7 -1.7 (-3.2, -0.1)
Salt Lake County 9 falling falling trend lower 647 147.1 (141.9, 152.5) 0.8 -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Sanpete County 9 falling falling trend lower 21 138.8 (113.2, 168.3) 0.8 -2.0 (-2.9, -1.1)
Summit County 9 falling falling trend lower 21 111.6 (88.4, 138.6) 0.6 -2.4 (-4.0, -0.9)
Utah County 9 falling falling trend lower 237 137.4 (129.5, 145.6) 0.8 -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Wasatch County 9 falling falling trend lower 17 126.9 (99.2, 159.4) 0.7 -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Washington County 9 falling falling trend lower 158 126.0 (117.1, 135.5) 0.7 -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Weber County 9 falling falling trend lower 155 144.1 (133.9, 154.9) 0.8 -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Morgan County
**
** similar 8 161.4 (114.7, 220.0) 0.9
**
Wayne County
**
** similar 3 132.0 (74.0, 229.3) 0.7
**
Daggett County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Piute County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Rich County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/10/2024 2:01 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Daggett County, Piute County, Rich County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Morgan County, Wayne County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top